OECD: UK pensions are among the worst in the world

Laura Shannon
by Lovemoney Staff Laura Shannon on 14 June 2012  |  Comments 20 comments

Pension reforms over the past decade have slashed future pension pots by as much as a quarter. A new report highlights how much better our European neighbours will have it.

OECD: UK pensions are among the worst in the world

A new report from the the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has claimed pension performance in the UK is among the worst in the developed world.

The report said recent pension reforms have shrunk pension pots for future generations – by 20-25% on average. People embarking on careers now can expect a pension worth half their net earnings if they retire after a full career and at the official retirement age.

But in countries where private pensions are compulsory or near-universal, pensioners can expect benefits of around 60% of earnings. This includes countries like Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden.

Why do our pensions look rubbish?

In a nutshell people aren’t saving enough, they’re not saving early enough, and they're not working long enough. Undoubtedly for those currently saving into a pension it feels like the complete opposite.

Some people have yet to save anything for old age, which we covered in One in five has no pension savings.

These factors, combined with falling annuity rates and poor investment returns, means our retirement pots fall short of the mark.

As a result many Brits are forced to work into their twilight years because they can’t afford not to. Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures published last week show that the number of people working beyond the state pension age has doubled in 20 years to reach 1.4 million pensioners.

The OECD Pension Outlook report also highlighted the extent of the problem with investment performance. The real return for UK pension funds is -0.1% for the period spanning 2001-10. By comparison, most other developed countries, including Chile and Poland, have seen an increase in returns for pension pots. Only Spain and the US produced figures worse than the UK.

What does all this mean for you?

Sadly, you’re more likely to be poor in retirement or forced to work long past the time you should have given up. Meanwhile our European counterparts will probably manage a bit better.

Official statistics show that pensioners in Britain are more likely to be living in poverty compared to mainland Europe. There is a higher at-risk-of-poverty rate for people aged over 65 in the UK - at 21.4% - compared to an average 18.9% in the EU.

It’s Europe versus the UK – but not in football, or even in votes tallied for the Eurovision song contest. It’s for pensions. And once again, we are nil points.

Why are other countries doing better?

Some countries have formally linked the pension age to life expectancy, while others have pushed the pensionable age up much faster than Britain, with ‘67 becoming the new 65’.

While this will happen in the UK by 2028, the likes of Iceland and Norway are already there.

Some countries also make saving into a private pension a requirement or at least near-compulsory.

How can we improve things at home?

Automatic enrolment might go some way to alleviate the problem. The plan is being rolled out gradually, starting in October this year, and will see millions of workers automatically placed into an eligible workplace pension scheme.

Your employer has to pay minimum contributions into the pot and if for some reason you don’t want any part in it, you will have to actively opt-out. The state pension age is also gradually going up.

The rest is up to you. Experts recommend that you put more into your pension each year and review your planning arrangements as often as you can. Increasing annual pension contributions from 8% to 12% can increase a pension pot by 50%, according to the Association of British Insurers. Delaying starting pension saving by five years can reduce a final pension pot by 17%.

For more ideas, read Six steps that will treble your pension.

More on pensions:

Code to end cash ‘bribes’ for transferring out of final salary pensions

20 reasons pensions go wrong

Why most pension savers lose

Annuity mess cuts average pension by 30%

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (20)

  • Getshutofgordon
    Love rating 8
    Getshutofgordon said

    I contributed to a final salary scheme and venture capitalists Sun Capital in USA acquired company, the scheme was underfunded to tune of about £5 million so they put company into administration one Friday, created a new company which acquired the assets from the administrators on the following Monday allowing them to ditch the pension scheme which went into the government protection scheme. I now have a measly reduced pension from it which will have no increases in its lifetime. I am still working but will never ever put money into a pension scheme again. I use ISA's now. Completely in my control and no tax on earnings.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Susanne
    Love rating 22
    Susanne said

    I don't contribute extra to a pension pot, for two reasons:

    1. My salary is going down, in real terms, every year, and substantially--no pay rises and hefty inflation. Even before the downturn, I didn't have enough extra for contributing to a pension pot.

    2. Every single pension scheme I've looked at is completely underfunded now. The one I'm in through my employer is, at the moment, 40% underfunded. To me that means that for every pound I put in, I can expect 40 p back, and that is *before* devaluation (this government, in its wisdom, just removed inflation protection from pension schemes). Sounds to me like a bad investment.

    3. Future governments, and certainly the current one, can be expected to tinker further with pension schemes. None of the changes they will make will be in favour of pensioners. That means that by the time I retire I can probably expect to get a glorious 10 p back for my 1 pound-investment.

    4. Pension pots of whatever stripe have one fatal flaw: the money you invest is not actually yours but the 'community's', i.e. they belong to the company who has made certain promises to the community of pensioners (most of which they won't be able to keep). These days, I really don't think it's a good idea to make investments that don't even result in an account somewhere with your name on it.

    5. Even (entirely justified) protests against the erosion of pension pots will not help you in future, even if (or rather: particularly if) they are successful. If your pension scheme manages to keep its word to current pensioners, trust me, they won't be able to keep their word to you--certainly not if you are, as I am, a good way away from retirement.

    The sum total of my financial planning is to pay off the mortgage. If I can do that before my enhanced 'retirement' age (which now realistically hovers around 75, if I live that long), I might then think of investing into ISAs. Not only will I never invest additional money into any pension pot, but I deeply resent the fact that I'm forced to put a huge part of my salary into a pension scheme that will undoubtedly be worth nothing by the time I retire. I look at it as paying about 70% tax.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • StephenIzzy
    Love rating 4
    StephenIzzy said

    Thats funny I thought I was paying into my pension with my national Insurance stamp thirty five years ago, I did have a private pension when I first started work with Legal and general, I stop it after four years when these sort of companies went tits up, and it had about £4000 in it now its worth £600, I would have been better sticking it in a low interest account, similar to a friends Uncle he paid in to another comany he ahs retired now and it worth less then what he was paid in, and nut forgetting the poor sods over the years who have paid good money in only to loose it when the company folds, and its not my fault that the money I pay into my national insurance is wasted else where within the so called government beacause of their over spending on their expenses, same sort of thing of our road tax then theres fuel excise duty a tax on fuel to drive on the road, isn't road tax for that ? its all a con and its all going down the pan.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Talent
    Love rating 77
    Talent said

    Hi Getshutofgordon, I feel incensed that this could happen to anyone. I think if it happened to me I would be compelled to do something drastic.... then maybe regret it.... just maybe!

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    I agree with all the comments above but additionally, how many people realise they have paid 14 years national insurance contributions for sweet FA?

    Thanks to Liebour changing the rules in April 2010 the minimum NI contributions required to receive the minimum state pension was reduced from 44 to 30 years.

    Part of the reason for this was to make the system fairer for women which I don’t have a problem with but I vehemently object to paying several thousands of pounds to the government for nothing.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Honest
    Love rating 1
    Honest said

    NI contributions were never ringfenced for "your pension pot" but paid for the govenrment spending of the day. This worked as the ratio of workers to pensioners was high. As the ratio decreases governments have to make tough decisons and must increase taxation and / or decrease benefits.

    The most equitable solution is to reduce benefits as this protects future generations - it seems unfair for the next generation to pay higher tax to pay benefits that they will not receive themselves especially when the current generation has failed to fund their own retirement.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    There never was a stated correlation between NI contributions and the pension. Get over yourselves and stop whining about a point in which some of you are factually incorrect. NI should be part of Income Tax, but that's another issue.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • charles125
    Love rating 53
    charles125 said

    French people get a state pension at age 59, and retire on average at age 53 to 54.

    Pay levels in the UK for ordinary workers continue to be absolutely abysmal compared to most of Europe.

    This means workers in the UK mostly cannot afford to supplement what are often extremely poor pensions. Many in the UK, especially the self-employed have no pension provision whatever aside of state OAP pension.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Farab
    Love rating 24
    Farab said

    ... then why does it show on the government website (direct.gov.uk) the top 4 "State benefits that depend on National Insurance contributions" as:

    - State Pension

    - contribution-based Jobseeker's Allowance

    - Bereavement Allowance

    - contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance

    ???

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 109
    Aitken B said

    Before the advent of NewLabour the UK had a non-state pension industry that was among the best in the world.

    The state pension however was in trouble.

    The name National Insurance is a misnomer. It suggests a similarity to a product supplied by an Insurance Company. If an insurance company had done with National Insurance “premiums” what successive governments have done it would have been prosecuted for corporate and perhaps individual fraud. N.I. is TAX, pure and simple and because it is just tax successive governments squander it just like any other tax. Thus the State Pension is paid using current receipts I.e. this year's pension payments depend on this year's tax receipts. This is OK when the number pensioners is small compared to the number of tax payers but we are getting older and the balance is changing – so we were/are in trouble with the State Pension.

    In 1998 the new New-Labour Government appeared to recognise this and asked one of their number, one Frank Field, to “think the unthinkable”. Now despite being a Labour guy Frank is a “canny lad”. He produced a report for Tony (Smiler) Bliar which basically said we were in the “Do Do” and recommended major changes.

    Did they thank him for his work? Did they congratulate him for his diligence and perspicacity?

    No, they sacked him from his ministerial post.

    And then – between 1998 and 2005 the Bliar/Brown regime mounted a huge and sustained tax raid on private pensions while massively improving the pension provisions and entitlement for MPs (paid for by the tax-payer i.e. the rest of us). Having conveniently “forgotten” Frank Field's report, it was only in 2005 that they suddenly had an epiphany and realised that the State Pension was facing a funding crisis and started to force “reforms” on us. For reforms read reducing benefit and increasing expense to the great unwashed outside of their favoured circle.

    Doubtless the private pension industry has taken a hit due to the greedy banker and incompetent government lead financial crisis but, make no mistake, it started off when Brown mounted his tax raid. (perhaps he thought we wouldn't notice)

    Of course none of this helps our present position but hopefully it will serve to ensure that we take any assurances given to us by Government with the largest possible pinch of salt. So if you make any provisions for your retirement please remember not to rely on any promises, implied or actual, made by government. I'm sure the clients of Equitable Life would concur with that sentiment.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    @Farab

    So NI pays for many other benefits and not just pension and the you list you quoted was merely the 'Top 4' - what part of 'no direct correlation' did you not understand?

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MK22
    Love rating 140
    MK22 said

    I like the idea that (all) our problems were created by New Labour, it's always good to allow the Tory's to blame Labour, sometime they are right. But a very major part of the problems with pensions in the UK has been created by accountants who said that companies must report pensions in the annual report and they then created a valuation system that consistently overvalues liabilities and undervalues assets. All of this false valuation stems from something called a Minimum Funding Requirement originally introduced by, whoops, the Tories.....

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ed Bowsher
    Love rating 79
    Ed Bowsher said

    The other big problem with pensions is that too many companies took 'pension holidays' in the 90s.

    Moving onto the point about NI and benefits. Farab, you're right to say that you can't get a full state pension unless you've paid in at least 30 years to NI.

    That said, the money the government receives from NI doesn't go into a special 'ring-fenced' fund that just pays out pensions and social security benefits. It goes into general government revenue and is paid out in that year to whatever the government wants to spend the money on.

    Ed

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Farab
    Love rating 24
    Farab said

    @electricblue

    "what part of 'no direct correlation' did you not understand?"

    The part where you never said 'no direct correlation' :-)

    You said ...

    "There never was a stated correlation between NI contributions and the pension"

    If you want to complain about people being 'factually incorrect', make sure that doesn't include you.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    @electric blue

    If you can afford to give £20k plus to the government for no return then you've got more money than sense.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • charles125
    Love rating 53
    charles125 said

    Oh and the government are intent on taking 5% from the lowest paid workers for an absolutely pathetic return on 5% of almost nothing. Just going to push many more even further into debt.

    I think I read somewhere it's called Capitalism. ie totally debt-ridden!!!!

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • oldhenry
    Love rating 265
    oldhenry said

    The problem is that there are just too many people living in the UK who are 'sucking' out the sytem rather than 'putting in'. The UK will be swamped with old folk and benefit claimants and there is no way that the funding is there from the current workforce. Cannot you see that the new jobs available are largely rubbish with no long term prospects and no chance of saving for retirement?

    I think the country's doomed - to quote a favourite of mine- how on earth will be funds be found to keep so many millions of pensioners in funds, bearing in mind the pension amount is derisory.

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    @Farab

    NI contributions go into a pot out of which many things are paid for. There is no correlation, direct or otherwise, the suggestion was that NI contributions directly and proportionately paid pensions, which they do not nor have they ever.

    NI contributions are a tax by any other name so bleating on about what return you get for extra contributions is also absolute nonsense.

    You pay the taxes you are obligated to pay and it is not a question of sense or otherwise. It's like telling people who earn a lot of money that they are stupid because they pay more tax. I haven't paid any NI contributions for the last six years myself as my self employed earnings were well below the threshold, but I will have the joy of joining the club again in the current tax year as business has now taken off and I can afford to be paid.

    @Oldhenry

    As you clearly have no knowledge whatsoever of the numerous high-tech industry jobs which the UK is creating and the areas of manufacturing in which we are world-class, your constant moaning about 'proper jobs' is getting tedious. What 'proper' job did you do? Do also please tell what you rate as 'rubbish jobs', so that readers of these threads can know precisely who you are insulting.

    As there seems to be some undercurrent regarding those who came to the UK to work, perhaps we should find out whether the Polish workers will be able to go back to Poland to retire with fabulous Polish pensions or will be stuck in dire poverty in the UK. Maybe we should all go to Chile, the land of freedom, democracy and amazing social care.

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Farab
    Love rating 24
    Farab said

    @electricblue

    Ah OK, so the state pension is funded by income tax.

    Report on 20 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • eLJay
    Love rating 76
    eLJay said

    @Farab - how many hi tech jobs are we going to need to keep this system afloat? I'd say a lot more than we currently have.

    Report on 25 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3