One in five has no pension savings

Laura Shannon
by Lovemoney Staff Laura Shannon on 21 May 2012  |  Comments 15 comments

As a nation, we're not saving enough money to live on when we retire - so what should you be squirreling away?

One in five has no pension savings

More than half of the working population are failing to save enough money to provide a decent enough income when they give up work.

Startling new statistics from Scottish Widows highlights the gap between people’s expectations in retirement and what they’re actually saving - and many workers look set to be disappointed in later life.

Unrealistic savings and expectations

Pension savings have hit a record low, according to Scottish Widow’s eighth annual Pensions Report, with one in five people putting nothing aside for retirement. Two fifths of over-30s would also like to retire by the time they reach 60, even though the State Pension age is rising to 66 by 2020 for both men and women.

Despite a lack of provision for later life, the annual income respondents said they would be comfortable living on by the age of 70 has increased by £200 since the last report to £24,500.

What you need to put aside

For people looking to draw a pension now, the average savings pot is £150,000, which buys an annuity (a guaranteed annual income) worth around £5,700.

With the State Pension on top, this equates to around £13,000 a year – a little over half the nation’s expectations for when they reach a pensionable age. If you wanted a yearly income of more than £24,000 a year, you would need to save an extra £375 a month to make up the difference.

Clearly that's a sum beyond many of us, but it is possible to identify areas where you can save a few extra pounds a month. One way to do this is to make use of the lovemoney.com MoneyTrack budgeting tool.

Start saving early

The earlier you start saving, the better the chances of your money growing in value.

This is thanks to compound interest. The interest paid in the second year of saving is based on your original sum invested, plus the interest earned the year before. This builds and builds steadily over the years and means it’s typically more effective to save a little and early than trying to save more when you’re older.

For example, if you save £50 a month for 30 years you could end up with a retirement pot worth more than £48,000. However, even if you save double – at £100 a month – for half the number of years, you’re likely to be left with savings worth less than £29,000.

You also benefit from tax relief on contributions into a pension scheme, boosting the value of your savings even further.

Read Six steps that will treble your pension for more tips on ways to boost the size of your pension pot.

Auto-enrolment

A final boost to your pension comes in the shape of auto-enrolment. This is being phased in from October this year and will see employees automatically enrolled into a pension scheme. For more information read Auto-enrolment: pensions are getting better, but nobody knows it.

If you are aged at least 22, are not already saving into a workplace pension and earn more than £7,475 a year, you will be affected by auto-enrolment.

Initially you pay a minimum of 1% of your salary into the savings scheme, while your employer will match this with a minimum 1%. This will rise to 5% and 3% respectively by October 2018.

You can opt-out of the scheme, but if you do this, you need to think of another way to save for retirement and other methods might not be as effective.

What are you doing to save for retirement? Do you think you are saving enough? Let us know in the comment box below.

More on retirement:

Why a SIPP is the smartest way to save for retirement

Pensions vs ISAs: how to save for retirement

Your salary will fall by £300 per year from October

Why most pension savers lose

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (15)

  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    A litre of petrol as less than tuppence when I was 22, makes you wonder about how big a pension someone will need in 43 years time... My guess is there won't be bank notes but if there were... Would you get change for a £1,000 putting in 10 litres?

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mergu54
    Love rating 0
    mergu54 said

    Dear Laura,

    Could you investigate the USP's for living out our Last Year's in another Country using what little Pension most of us have & / or end up with. For example, one of my Indonesian Client's told me that you can Buy a 1 Bed Flat for £ 10K ! which is a Long Lease, and he also said that one could live quite comfortably on £ 5K a year !

    The only downside, is that you would be living on the "Pacific Rim / Fault", so you may be in danger to Mother Nature ! Do you know of any other affordable Countries like this, that we could live in ? Regards...........................................Mergu54.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    Yes, but when you were 22 cars didn't exist to put petrol in, Mike.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • chrisjej
    Love rating 0
    chrisjej said

    Can I ask that you qualify more of your article with ages.

    If it's true that "One in five has no pension savings" but those people are all under the age of 30, it means a lot less than if they're over 60.

    Similarly "you would need to save an extra £375 a month to make up the difference" means nothing without an age for reference.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jnbtts
    Love rating 0
    jnbtts said

    Tried saving for retirement as recommended by previous governments and advisors. Each year the privider took their cut for managing the fund.

    The amount in the fund, now .that I am retirement age, is a trivial amount.

    Why should anyone be tempted to place good money into schemes that provide the financial institutions with a good income but when those same institutions cause an economic melt down it is us, not them that pay the orice?

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    Well if you prefer to waste your money now on I pads and all the other electronic cr*p then it's your own fault if you're short of money in retirement.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • fenemore
    Love rating 202
    fenemore said

    I concur Yorkstyke - the definition of poverty has moved from "putting food on the table" to "not being able to afford the latest Smart TV".

    People make unwise choices early in their working lives - after all, they are NEVER going to get OLD. If its between today's "must haves" and your pension-fund, well we know which will win.

    The proverb "you cannot put an old head on young shoulders" is as true today as it ever was.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    I have a number of pension pots, and they are worth bugger all.

    Why save, when what you are putting aside will amount to little or nothing when you retire. My latest pension statements show that my expected pensionable salary is less than what was quoted last year.

    I think more and more people are coming to the conclusion that putting money into a pension pot is a simple waste. Mind you, it is whether you can afford to put aside money for your retirement.

    What with increases in taxation (the government has just included Cornish Pasties in the VAT scope), no wonder people cannot afford to save for their retirement.

    I actually think that taxation is designed to ensure that any reasonable expendable income can be claimed by the state. No longer do we contribute a small portion of our wages or salary to the upkeep of the state. In fact, it feels more like the state are allowing us to keep a small portion of what we earn, to live off.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    Save? At present you lose.

    Was changed from final salary to money purchase 10 years ago. It LOST 500 quid in the first year.

    Don't give your money to crooks in suits. Buy gold over 40 years. I wish I had.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Grobbendonk
    Love rating 26
    Grobbendonk said

    Pensions simply don't seem to be worth it at the moment. With high inflation and paltry interest rates, they don't appear to grow fast enough to be worth it, especially when most of us are being squeezed on energy, and food bills, let alone general tax hikes and the rest. Many of us have lost faith in them as well - Equitable Life, two large raids on pension funds, being asked to put in more and work longer to get the same out of the other end and increasing threats of loss of tax relief. All of this sounds like relatively minor stuff individually, but accumulating the despair in the idea simply makes it utterly unattractive. There's no incentive at the moment to save any money at all, and what little people can afford to put aside is going into short-term savings because we don't know when the next price rise or tax hike is going to kick us in the wallet. We all know saving for our old age is a good idea, but it's simply not practical for low earners (and increasingly, middle income earners - I don't think I know anyone who is putting anywhere near enough into their pension, unless they're in the 40% tax bracket)

    Give people the incentive to do it, and they will. There's no incentives at the moment.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DeeTee
    Love rating 2
    DeeTee said

    So the plan is that everyone who is working will automatically contribute a portion of their earnings into a pot of money that will also contain contributions from the organisation that employs said individuals and then that money will be distributed to the individuals upon retirement?

    One would think that you could nationalise that system and have it run and protected by those that want to protect the interest of the nation and its inhabitants, like the state.

    Oh wait . . . .

    Report on 22 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LiamT
    Love rating 45
    LiamT said

    "For people looking to draw a pension now, the average savings pot is £150,000, which buys an annuity (a guaranteed annual income) worth around £5,700."

    - that assumes we will live for 26 years after retirement?! how many blokes actually achieve that?! i will most likely work until i am 70 then die at 75, like most men seem to. the wife can have the house as she is 10 years younger than me.

    "Well if you prefer to waste your money now on I pads and all the other electronic cr*p then it's your own fault if you're short of money in retirement."

    - well most people will only buy an ipad style gadget every 2 years or so. thats £200 a year. we need to put in £400 a MONTH to get a semi decent pension. that is a massive difference.

    as said above i think many people dont seem to think they will get a decent return. we are investing in a nice house. that will be our retirement fund. we just cannot afford to save now as everything is so expensive. i would rather be poor when old than poor when young.

    i have 5 years of pension accrued from my last employer. i would have to live 20+ years after retirement to even see my money back. and that pension pot is millions under funded.

    its easy for the older people to moan but they often had nice sinal salary pensions and good returns. we have neither.

    Report on 22 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Geoff Carse
    Love rating 6
    Geoff Carse said

    If a pension pot of £150,000 only gives you an annuity of £5700 then surely you'd be much better off putting all your savings into an ISA. And even if the interest rate was only 4% it would still be better than a pension.

    I've been drip-feeding my spare cash into a tracker fund the past 5 years, and despite our fibrillating economy it's still earning me more than 4%.

    So the question is: Why would anyone want to invest in a pension?

    Report on 27 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bluetie
    Love rating 0
    bluetie said

    "an annuity (a guaranteed annual income) worth around £5,700."

    This article similar to newspapers doesn't confirm whether this £5,700 is what's left after taking up to 25% cash lump sum or before any deductions.

    Also does this figure reflect the annuity life only or whether next of kin would still receive a reduced pension after the annuity holder's death?

    If both options above are chosen at the start of the pension, then the amount per year would obviously be less.

    Can you author confirm please?

    Report on 30 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Qrops
    Love rating 0
    Qrops said

    A lot of pension funds have been performing very poorly the last few years. There are alternatives available offering higher growth potential than conventional pension schemes

    Source: http://www.the-qrops-specialist.com

    Report on 30 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3