Pay less tax on your earnings

Laura Shannon
by Lovemoney Staff Laura Shannon on 02 June 2012  |  Comments 16 comments

There are ways to pay less tax without becoming either a tax evader or morally repugnant. Jimmy Carr, take note!

Pay less tax on your earnings

Smarting up on tax means you can keep more of your hard-earned income and boost your wealth for the future. 

But should you be publically shamed like next Jimmy Carr for doing so? Probably not. 

The comedian was criticised for his use of an offshore tax scheme to dodge paying tax on his income, something he has now rectified. Most people simply forget to claim what they’re entitled to. 

It’s prudent to limit the tax you pay and maximise what you’re paid in relief. But for a bit of guidance, we’ve created a traffic light system for tax tricks that are A-OK, crafty or morally questionable. 

Green – you’re good to go


Savings:

Maximise your ISA allowance and save up to £11,280 per person in a stocks and shares ISA, or up to half of that amount - £5,640 – in a cash ISA. 

Unlike traditional savings accounts, the interest you earn in an ISA is free of tax. You can compare ISAs to find one with the right terms or which pays the highest rate of interest. 

Pensions:

The more you pay into a pension, the more tax relief is added on top. This is because contributions are made from your after-tax income, so you’re paid the tax back on money used towards retirement savings. 

Tax relief is automatically added at the basic rate of 20%, so when you pay £80 into your pension, the government adds another £20. If you’re a higher rate taxpayer, you can claim back more (at the rate you pay income tax) through self-assessment. 

People don’t always take full advantage of this benefit, and according to unbiased.co.uk, four million workers who aren’t paying into a pension are missing out on £2.5 billion of income tax relief. 

You can pay up to £50,000 a year into your pension savings and get tax relief. You can also carry forward any unused part of your annual allowance from the previous three years to the current tax year. When you to come to take an income from your pension pot, you will be hit by extra tax if you end up withdrawing a total pension income greater than £1.5 million.

Other allowances:

Make sure you claim any child tax credits or pension credits you’re eligible for and make efficient charity donations, which can be topped up by Gift Aid. 

Consider putting your life insurance policy into trust, which means a pay-out could be free of inheritance tax and the money goes directly to the family members named on the policy. Also, check if you’re one of the thousands owed an inheritance tax rebate

If you have children, you might want to consider childcare vouchers. You can sacrifice a portion of your salary before income tax or national insurance contributions are deducted to buy vouchers, which pay for childcare or out of school clubs and holiday schemes. But check how this might affect your eligibility for child tax credits first. 

Amber – it’s shrewd, but beware of crackdowns


Becoming your own boss:

You can set up your own limited company to eliminate income tax and national insurance, paying just corporation tax at 20% instead - a highly effective method for high earners who would otherwise be paying 40% or 50%. 

This is done by paying yourself a minimum monthly wage (below thresholds for income tax and National Insurance) and then topping up your income with dividends. Any business costs, such as using cars for work or your phone, can also be paid for by your own company. 

This is legitimate if done correctly but there are some rules governing this grey area. 

HMRC introduced ‘IR35’ over a decade ago to prevent employees leaving their job only to be re-employed in the same capacity but as a contractor. Instead of the employer paying a salary directly to the employee, a fee would be paid to the worker’s new company. This is regarded as evasion as opposed to a clever tax trick. 

‘Flipping’ property:

This tactic was made infamous a few years ago when it was revealed that hundreds of MPs had flipped their homes, benefitting from Private Residence Relief. 

By switching the home that’s nominated as your main residence, you can avoid or limit Capital Gains Tax on any profit from selling a second home. 

It’s a legal loophole, but you will have to jump through some hoops to appease HMRC. 

Red – it might be legal, doesn’t mean it’s right

Offshore schemes:

K2 – which until this month, many would have associated with a mountain in Asia – is an offshore scheme that reduced its clients’ tax rate to just 1%. This is the plan Jimmy Carr probably now wishes he’d never heard of. 

Salaries are transferred into the trust, based in Jersey, which then lends money to its clients. The loan is free of income tax. 

It’s legal but has been referred to as ‘morally repugnant’ and the government is now formally consulting on a General Anti-Avoidance Rule targeting ‘artificial and abusive tax avoidance.’ 

People who are non-domiciled in the UK can also avoid paying tax on interests held overseas, even if they reside in this country. Non-doms and the tax they do or don't pay is an area the government is constantly looking to squeeze, or at least says it is. 

Avoiding stamp duty:

It’s not unheard of for house sellers to keep a property price artificially below the stamp duty threshold, while charging more for ‘fixtures and fittings’. 

This would tempt first time buyers who wanted to avoid paying Stamp Duty, which starts at 1% of the transaction value for homes valued at £125,000, while sellers still receive the price they want for their home. 

However, the rules changed a number of years ago and you have to complete a form with full details relating to the transaction. 

The Revenue can also investigate a sale for up to nine months after the return form has been filed. If the sum paid for fixtures and fittings is large, HMRC could become suspicious and you could be lumped with a big tax bill. 

More on tax: 

Would you use a tax avoidance scheme? 

Six easy ways to pay less tax 

Thousands owed inheritance tax rebate

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (16)

  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    Tony Blair set up a company to avoid tax. Was that any more acceptable than what Jimmy Carr did? We need to encourage morality and this article isn't the way to do it.

    Report on 30 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • wallace47
    Love rating 4
    wallace47 said

    I think the Government want to get it's own house in order about "tax evasion" by looking into MP's expenses and tax dodges.

    We at the bottom have to pay more tax.... so those at the topr can pay less, and get away with it.

    At least that is how it seems.

    Report on 30 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • teafoo
    Love rating 47
    teafoo said

    Not this again!

    Why have a go at the people who use legal loopholes .. of which an ISA is one ..

    the fault lies in the legislators, the MPs (our representatives, ha ha) who complicate the systems and penalise those who earn by taxing our money several times. Yes, several times .. Income Tax, then CGT, then IHT.

    Scandalous.

    And to make things even worse, the MPs then go ahead and WASTE billions of pounds -- of OUR money. If they spent it better then taxes might be slightly more palatable.

    "It might be legal, doesn't mean it is right" - doesn't mean it is wrong either.

    Next thing will be that we are told it is 'wrong' to buy the cheapest versions of everyday things. "Go out and buy the expensive version" - that's what the sanctimonious moaners are saying!

    Let them emigrate ... off shore. Without a paddle.

    Report on 30 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • oldhenry
    Love rating 265
    oldhenry said

    Cameron is pure humbuug and should be exposed. Carr is a prat for not attacking Cameron's two' facededness'. What a cheek Cameldung has to attck Carr when his servants let Vodafone off billions in tax, and Goldman Sachs of millions. His own tax department have used offshore companies to sale and lease back properties. All Cameldung's mates in the banks do it, what a hypocrite.

    He should read Private Eye to find out what is going on. I fully support all loopholes to avoid tax, I suppose as an accountant I would, as I know that HMRC always pick on the weakest of society , as bullies do .

    Of course bringing the tax rates down would reduce the need for loopholes anyway so get those tax rates down to the level of Jersey and there will be no problem.

    What? that would mean Cameldung could not provide billions to prop up dictators around the globe or give money to nations working towards nuclear missiles!

    Report on 30 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    People set up companies to limit personal liability, not just to evade tax. It might not be relevant in Blair's case and his tax avoidance is pretty hypocritical for a 'Socialist', but anyone in manufacturing or sales would certainly want to have the protection of a Limited Company. It is crazy to work beyond a certain turnover without personal safeguards. There are Limited Liability Partnerships so a similar system for sole traders would have attractions and could be a compulsory status for those whose product is basically themselves.

    Cameron hasn't introduced any new loopholes or systems than those which were endemic under Labour so blaming him for the failures of the Inland Revenue is pretty lame.

    Report on 30 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rbgos
    Love rating 81
    rbgos said

    Note on "becoming your own boss" - this barely decreases your income tax bill. If you would have been a 40% taxpayer, but instead your money goes into your company and you then pay yourself dividends from the company, the company will pay 20% corporation tax, then you will pay (effectively) 22.5% dividend income tax on the remaining 80%. That works out at a total of 38%, barely less than the 40% you would have paid as a normal employee.

    This can be only be avoided if you don't actually take all your earnings out of the company - you don't need to pay income tax on it while it's still in the company (although you'll still pay the 20% corp tax right away). Take out what you need to live on now, and let the rest stay in the company for years and years, then take it out later when you retire.

    The main immediate tax advantage of this approach is that you can avoid paying National Insurance, as this is not paid on money taken as dividends.

    Report on 02 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Baldrixs
    Love rating 3
    Baldrixs said

    rbgos is correct however you should also consider additional costs involved with running Ltd Companies which can be considerable for example:

    Accountancy Fee, Liability Insurance and Patrol Management to but a few.

    If these are included in your tax calculation then 38% can become more than 40%.

    Report on 02 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • funkyimage
    Love rating 1
    funkyimage said

    A number of dads are now becoming their own boss in order to pay less maintenance via the CSA. My ex has recently done this and I now get a 1/4 of the maintenance that I should do. I find it an absolute disgrace that they can do this in order to pay less money for their children.

    Report on 03 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • hopefultom
    Love rating 43
    hopefultom said

    I have never been a fan of Jimmy Carr, but I think it is wrong that he should have been singled out for criticism in respect of the perfectly legal system of tax avoidance he has employed.

    If David Cameron does not like the system, he should change it ( apparently he is trying to ) It is, however a tricky one for him to accomplish without upsetting some of his city pals.

    I do feel that there is a need to introduce a new tax which might even things up a little. I would call it a " hypocracy Tax " and it would be levied on anyone making public pronouncements about the tax avoidance measures of others, whilst practising one of these measures themselves.

    It would start at 50% and increase by 10% for every further utterance.To the best of my knowledge this would put Mr Carr on 60%

    Report on 03 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • SiGl26
    Love rating 26
    SiGl26 said

    rbgos missed the possibility of Directors' loans... The company retains profits and loans money to its directors. Looked at it myself, but the CT rate on my company (US corporation, 35%) makes it moot.

    Don't usually agree much with Oldhenry (too many anti-Conservative rants for my taste; could you tone it down a bit??) but he's right that unreasonable tax levels (gov't keeping more of you income than you? how can that be right??) encourage avoidance.

    Report on 05 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bobmattfran
    Love rating 58
    bobmattfran said

    Some of those whining on about how much tax they have to pay need to grow up.

    I used to pay tax at 87% on the last 30% of my earnings. I looked at it from the point of view that a) I was earning enough to pay it. b) I was giving back something to the country that gave me the opportunities in education and training to enable me to earn a salary. C) Income tax is the fairest of all taxes as the payer is assessed on the ability to pay, any other indirect tax in iniquitous. D) My taxes went some way to supporting the less fortunate in our society.

    Get a life you guys, in these troubled times you are lucky to have a job.

    Report on 05 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 109
    Aitken B said

    Ladies and Gents - Let's not put politicians or HMRC in any phrase that contains "moral" other than one that describes their lack of it.

    As another post put it, if the government stop wasting industrial quantities of our money fewer people will be motivated to avoid their gready, grasping raids on our hard earned cash.

    Few of us begrudge paying a bit to help out those experiencing difficult times but when we see what the Westminster Village idiots do with all the money they extort from us, it is little wonder we try to keep as much of it away from them as possible.

    Report on 06 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • joannakd
    Love rating 9
    joannakd said

    Whilst everyone is attacking the lawmakers of this great land, why don't each one of you stand for Parliament or your local Borough/Parish/Town Council ?

    Politicians are also human. Like everybody, a small percentage give the rest a bad name.

    Rant over.

    Report on 07 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • yocoxy
    Love rating 132
    yocoxy said

    Blimey, an accountant who writes in such a childish way, name calling the prime minister cameldung. I thought accountancy was considered an educated profession..

    High taxes are not caused by Cameron looking after his mates but by the massive overspending of the socialists..

    Report on 07 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • andrewjameshowar
    Love rating 25
    andrewjameshowar said

    What is morally repugnant is that tens of thousands of well-paid public servants cannot/will not pull their thumbs out of their ***s and fix the tax system so that such that these avoidance schemes no longer work. If all these civil servants continue to be so useless, then sack the lot of them and reduce everyone's tax bill at a stroke.

    They are the true villains of the piece.

    Report on 07 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Bierlijn
    Love rating 24
    Bierlijn said

    This Jimmy Carr saga originates from HMRC, who are creating a smoke screen to hide their near criminal activities.with respect to the 'forgiving' of the tax avoidance schemes of major companies. Vodaphone. Goldman Sachs.

    The involvement of the major accountancy companies in Government projects and at the same time in designing tax avoidance schemes for large firms is the great vampire squid wrapped around politicians and civil servants.

    http://www.private-eye.co.uk/sections.php?section_link=in_the_back

    Report on 07 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3