What we can learn from Wayne Rooney's tax return!

Robert Powell
by Lovemoney Staff Robert Powell on 25 August 2011  |  Comments 32 comments

Here's an important financial lesson we can glean from the Manchester United forward...

What we can learn from Wayne Rooney's tax return!

Wayne Rooney pays 2% tax on some earnings.

That’s the headline that got the Sunday Times into a spot of bother with the Manchester United forward earlier this year. The footballer complained to the press watchdog stating that the story was not accurate and lacked any reply.

But the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) ruled in favour of the Sunday paper, stating that the headline was explained within the article.

So how exactly does Rooney get away with paying 2% tax?

How Rooney does it...

When is Wayne Rooney not Wayne Rooney?

When he’s ‘Wayne Rooney Ltd’ of course. Yes, ‘the Rooster’ manages to pay just 2% tax on some of earnings because he doesn’t actually earn it – his limited company does.

Let me explain.

Many premiership footballers will now funnel off-pitch earnings (mainly from image-rights) through their very own company. So when Wayne Rooney is paid for his latest cringe-worthy advert or tacky TV series, the fee will not go to the man himself but to his company.

As this is a UK company, all profits will be subject to corporation tax – previously 28% if over £1.5m and now 26% as of April 2011.

From here Rooney is able to take a loan from the company and legally only pay 2% in tax as the loan is classed as a benefit, not as income. The Sunday Times reported that Rooney did this a number of times over a two-year period, ‘borrowing’ £1.6m in total and saving nearly £600,000 in tax.

Now, obviously the footballer’s issue with the story was that in total he did not pay 2% tax. As 28% corporation tax had already been deducted from the earnings before he took any loans. However this is still a good deal lower than the 50% tax rate that Rooney would have had to pay if he had taken the earnings as regular income.

Rooney also stated that these directors’ loans were actually paid back the following year. A point The Sunday Times article failed to mention.

So what can we all learn from Rooney’s completely legal tax dodging antics?

How you can do it...

Almost anyone can set up their own limited company and appoint themselves as director.

If you do, from a tax perspective, like Rooney your business’ profits will be liable for corporation tax. This is levied at 20% if profits do not exceed £300,000 per year. On a simple level, you would then pay yourself a salary out of this business account and be taxed at the appropriate rate of income tax. And as you are an employee of the company this salary can be written off before you pay corporation tax. So if you take a wage below the basic rate range and business profits stay below £300,000, you'll only pay 20% on your personal wage and 20% on your business profits.

However there are several other tax perks to running your own company. For example, as it’s likely that you will be the total share holder in the company, you could supplement your salaried income by paying yourself dividends. These would initially be taxed at basic rate, however could attract a higher rate if – when combined with your salary – they push you over a certain income level.

In addition, you would be able to fund your pension using your business profits in much the same way a regular employer would pay out for an employee’s pension. These payments would be tax free.

Work-related expenses funded by your business account are another advantage as they will be tax allowable and hence written off before you pay corporation tax (employee wages, including yours, form part of these expenses). However there are strict guidelines laid down by HMRC as to what you can and cannot claim as a business expense. And if you step over this line, you could end up with a knock on the door from the police.

This is why it’s highly advisable to use an accountant when deciding whether setting up your own company. As not only will they make sure you stay within the law, they will also be able to dig out any further legal loopholes that could help you save money on your tax bill (as Rooney’s accountant has so cunningly done for him).

As one such accountant said to a friend of mine upon setting up his own business; “welcome to the world of permanent basic rate tax”.

But still, setting up your own business is a big decision and should never been entered into lightly. Although that doesn’t mean that we can’t all learn a few things from Rooney’s tax dodging behaviour...

Check your income tax code

While receiving a hefty tax refund is always a nice surprise, remember it does also mean that you have effectively been loaning the government money every month. And while this might be very much in the spirit of the ‘big society’ it’s not a great idea if you are struggling to make ends meet – as many people currently are. This is why it is vital that you consistently check that you’re on the correct tax code.

Income tax codes are made up of a few numbers and a letter. The numbers represent your personal allowance; that’s the amount you’re allowed to earn before you get taxed. Most people will see a 747 tax code on their pay slip. This indicates that you will receive a personal allowance of £7,475.

The most common letter to see is L – indicating that you are eligible for the basic level of personal allowance.

You can find a full explanation of every tax code by heading over the HMRC website.

Use your partner

A further way to slash your tax bill it is to ensure that you and your partner are completely using both of your personal allowances. For example, if you’re a taxpayer but your partner isn’t, transferring any income producing assets to his/her name will enable you to shell out to the taxman at a lower rate by utilising your partner’s unused allowance.

As I mentioned earlier the basic personal allowance currently stands at £7,475. This increases to £9,940 for those aged 65-74 and £10,090 if you are over 75.

Get an ISA

ISAs should be the first port of call for all savers as they do not charge income tax on the interest earned. However there are limits to how much you can squirrel away in one of these taxman-beating accounts. This currently stands at £10,680. You can invest all of part of this in a stocks and shares ISA or £5,340 of the allowance in a cash ISA.

Cash ISAs basically work like regular savings bonds – with the exception that they are tax free of course. You can get a rundown of the current top accounts by taking a look around our ISA centre.

Stocks and shares ISAs are slightly more complicated and can vary in form more substantially; head over to Savers turn to stocks and shares ISAs to find out more.

And finally, for seven more cunning ways to beat the taxman read Ten legal ways to dodge tax.

Should footballers be forced to shell out?

Is it fair for players like Rooney to dodge large amounts of tax?

Have your say using the comment box below.

More: The cheapest TV sports packages | Beware - the taxman is on your tail! | The poorest pay the most tax

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (32)

  • IPINLive
    Love rating 13
    IPINLive said

    This type of financial management is not new and has been going on for years. What isn't pointed out is that a similar thing can be done offshore to reduce tax liabilities further still. Also the ability to purchase assets ("Wayne Rovers" etc) and lease them back to yourself - opening the door to further tax reductions.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Harvey Jones
    Love rating 22
    Harvey Jones said

    Yes, but you still pay 20% corporation tax and 20% basic rate tax, so doesn't this add up to 40%, which ain't exactly progress? Or am I missing something?

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • IPINLive
    Love rating 13
    IPINLive said

    You only pay the 20% corporation tax "if profits do not exceed £300,000 per year." The way around this is to purchase assets/make investments etc with the corporation to keep the profit from going over the 300k limit.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • rbgos
    Love rating 81
    rbgos said

    Other downsides of working through a company you own yourself, rather than as a normal employee. is that you get:

    - no paid days off, holidays, bank holidays etc.

    - no sick pay, and no support if you are unwell and unable to work for any length of time (unless you take out insurance)

    - No employer contributing to your pension fund (although, as mentioned, paying contributions to your pension out of the company, rather than your pay, is tax-efficient)

    - if you want/need training, you won't get paid while doing it, and you'll have to pay the costs of the course yourself

    - your contract can usually be terminated in a matter of days, with no redundancy regardless of the reasons

    I'm not saying not to do it - just know what you're letting yourself in for! I did it, and I'm glad I did, not just because of the earnings and tax benefits, but because being a freelancer / contractor gives me more control of my working life, when I work, what hours I do, who and when I work for etc.

    If your business is pretty simple (the only, or at least the main, thing you are selling is your own time, and it only involves you or possibly one or two other people) you CAN do all your own accountancy, which is a saving. There are websites that will do most of it for you such as Freeagent.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    He also does quite well because he gets income that is subject to capital gains tax and can use his allowance; unlike many real workers. Real workers pay a higher percentage of their income in tax and national insurance because it is earned income; they actually earn it. Kicking a bag of wind around a field is nice work if you can get it though.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • J K
    Love rating 1
    J K said

    Typical. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer!! Why does the Government still tax our savings and cap what we can put into an tax free ISA??

    Them and us still provails!!

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • malcolms42
    Love rating 0
    malcolms42 said

    If you pay 20% Corporation Tax, then 20% Basic Rate Tax, aren't you only paying 36% Tax in total? Surely the 20% Basic rate Tax is on 80% of the Total, not 100%. This may not seem much, but 4% of a very large sum is itself a large sum.

    I always thought that Sports Stars, such as footballers, were able to offset their earnings because of their very limited working life, i.e. earn now, pay tax later.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Jabo
    Love rating 0
    Jabo said

    This article is totally misleading to the layman. It is suggesting that anyone can just set up a company and benefit from reduced tax rates. This is not the case.

    If Rooney had not repaid the amount the company would have been subject to a further 25% tax under s.455 CTA 2010. In addition if an employed individiual would do this then they would be caught by IR35 and not be in the same position. Not to mention the new diguised remuneration legislation.

    Finally as you say Rooney is doing everything legally so he is not breaking the law. For those moaning about him I bet you use pension relief and ISA's to legally arrange your affairs in the most tax efficient way. Just inaccurate scaremongering!

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • poppasmurf
    Love rating 31
    poppasmurf said

    I know loads of people who do this, some still claim tax credits and PAY Zero tax themselves on there stated monthly wages under £500 you still pay a few quid in NIC and that's it the rest is yours. As its your companies money you can do with what you like.

    The company pays the 10%? Company Tax on Profits or some such thing.

    Pathetic really when the country is on its knees, and its all legal.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • lombard1
    Love rating 1
    lombard1 said

    Harvey Jones - What you are missing is the Corp tax is only payable @ 20% if you have profits over 300k.

    While this would apply to Wayne Rooney it will probably not apply to the majority of self employed consultants etc.

    You can purchase yourself a company car and offset any profits as much as possible against claimable expenses.

    Also in order to pay out income from the limited company - you would pay yourself £7475 (or upto your tax code) paying 0% tax, then pay yourself the next £35k in shareholder dividends @10% and so on - Dividends are not only cheaper on tax but also do not attract National insurance payments.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Jabo
    Love rating 0
    Jabo said

    @ rbgos I would suggest you do see an accountant or at least look on one of your websites about IR35. You may be suprised!

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Jabo
    Love rating 0
    Jabo said

    @ Lombard1 erm did you just forget to mention the company car tax and fuel tax? Unless you want to drive a GWizz this will probably end up costing you more in tax!

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • poppasmurf
    Love rating 31
    poppasmurf said

    Jabo, buy a scooter. :-)

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • gola
    Love rating 4
    gola said

    Re "ISAs should be the first port of call for all savers as they do not charge income tax on the interest earned.", I'd say that Index-Linked National Saving Certificates are a much better bet if you can leave your savings be for a while.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • lombard1
    Love rating 1
    lombard1 said

    @ Jabo - No I didn't forget the car tax or fuel

    As an employee you could decide not to take company fuel and claim back your business miles from your company at HMRC rate! - Hence why I did not mention fuel in my post.

    Also you would be suprised what low CO2 vehicles are available - as your Benefit in kind will only be 20% I understand a Mercedes C220 CDI would only be £60.20 per month in tax - considering the purchase / leasing costs would be 20% cheaper for the company due to claim back of VAT than it would be for an individual and you would deduct leasing costs from profitible income I don't believe that would be unreasonable.

    Also while I understand your post below - can you not claim capital allowances against asset puchases which can be written off against tax?

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Jabo
    Love rating 0
    Jabo said

    @ IPINLive "The way around this is to purchase assets/make investments etc with the corporation to keep the profit from going over the 300k limit."

    The amount of inaccurate information on this board is unbelievable. Why would you get a deduction for purchasing assets/making investments other than pension contributions and capital allowances?

    Also any other investment may push the company into an investment company position which would automatically mean that it is subject to full rate of 26%. Can people who do not know what they are talking about stop please.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Jabo
    Love rating 0
    Jabo said

    @lombard1

    1. The rate would be restricted to 13p/16p per mile not the 40p/25p.

    2. VAT is only reclaimable on leased vehicles and at 50%.

    3. The purchase cost would be subject to capital allowances on a reducing basis. At 10% or 20% of the cost. I think you are thinking of AIA's that are not available in respect of cars.

    4. Leasing costs are restricted depending on the CO2 emissions. Your example will probably be 100% deductable though.

    5. The car benefit is calculated on the list price of the car not the amount you pay for it.

    I would love to see the comparison between the company owning the car you have mentioned and personally. I would wager that there is not a lot in it!

    Any way my point is that people are getting the wrong idea about setting up a company and the tax implications of doing so. Everyone considering this should see a suitably qualified professional not just read a forum as someone else suggested.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    Poppasmurf - no, you are pathetic and obviously jealous. The hassle of being self-employed in all but the simplest of businesses is not offset by the benefits. I had a business employing four people, but am happier now just scraping by on a little consultancy and a bit of manufacturing I can do myself. Money only stays untaxed at one level and one way or another someone has to spend it on taxed goods. I do plan to go back to larger scale manufacturing - but it won't be in this country, it will be in the USA as soon as they get rid of the idiot they have as a President.

    I wouldn't want Wayne Rooney's money if the penalty was having to look as ugly as he does. Some things you just can't compensate for.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • lombard1
    Love rating 1
    lombard1 said

    @ Jabo

    I would 100% agree with you on your last comment. The world of tax is as mysterious as it is wonderful to the layman!

    For what it is worth I believe the company owned car would be beneficial over an individual one by c£600 per year. - not a great sum but hey it would pay some of your tax accountants bill.

    Also the rate for a >2000cc Diesel Company car went up in June to 18p per mile.

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cars/advisory_fuel_current.htm

    I cannot stress enough though that anyone reading this should consult a properly qualified tax accountant e,g, CTA etc . Not just an accountant or someone advertising tax services in the local paper. From my experience some individuals lack the specialist knowledge involved and are too scared of HMRC and the threat of going to prison to suitably advise their clients correctly. Although more expensive up front, a good tax accountant should be able to pay for themselves.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Perry525
    Love rating 25
    Perry525 said

    You forget to mention the advantage of being registered for VAT.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Donna Ferguson
    Love rating 130
    Donna Ferguson said

    It was my headline, not Rob's and based on your feedback I have changed it. Thanks for your help.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Robert Powell
    Love rating 3
    Robert Powell said

    Thanks for the comments, apologies about the headline.

    Obviously using Rooney's tax methods are only really practical if you earn enough to push you into the higher tax brackets. It's also worth noting that directors loans have to be paid back.

    On the subject of corporation tax, £300,000 is the upper limit of the 20% small profits rate. So if profits are more than £300,000 per year you'll have to pay the marginal rate - and over £1.5m is the main rate.

    Yes, if you ran your own business you would have to pay 20% corporation tax and 20% income tax, but the tax benefits would come out of the allowable expenses, pension payouts and dividends (and other loopholes that a cunning accountant would no doubt find you). From people I've spoken to, expenses is the big advantage though.

    The general idea is (from the people I have spoken to who run their own businesses) that you pay yourself minimum wage from your business account so only a small percentage of your profits are taxed at both the corporation and income tax rates. That leaves everything else solely taxed at the 20% corporation rate. These are the profits you can use for the real tax advantages of running your own business (with help from an accountant).

    As has been mentioned though, running your own business should not be entered into lightly. Rooney is not a tax-master (I guess), his accountant is.

    It would be interesting to hear everyones views on the ethical dimension of legal tax loopholes, as poppasmurf mentioned. Is it right for anyone to be using tax loopholes while the country is financially on its knees?

    Thanks,

    Rob

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    The country isn't 'financially on it's knees' . Manufacturing and most hi-tech industry is rock solid and growing. Automotive manufacturing is at an all time high. That people made a living selling cr*p which those with more money than sense chose to buy, based on their over inflated property appreciation is the biggest issue. Those smart enough to avoid tax are probably in general those who have contributed most to the economy. I will exclude the generally ugly and dim footballing fraternity from that last comment, however.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • comptroller
    Love rating 5
    comptroller said

    Whether one like Wayne Rooney as a person or not, or the club he plays for, or footballers in general, they largely abide by the law and, for the richer ones at least, pay handsomely for tax advice.

    These well advised individuals do everything they can to lessen the amount they pay HMRC, as would, I guess, nearly every reader of this column given the opportunity, the article itself even cites tax loopholes that are available to everyone, transfer of assets, ISA's etc. Personally I am not of the opinion that the highest rate of tax at 50% is excessive but I am in the minority. There is a well proven theory that a simple lower flat rate of tax yields more for any Government than a complex system with, what some view, high penal rates, this was demonstrated when Margeret Thatcher's administration reduced the highest rate of tax from 83% (98% on unearned income) to 60% and then 40% but the tax take actually increased.

    However until a Government does reduce tax, something that will be politically unacceptable for a long period of time, it is naive to believe that those who can take proper advice, rather than snippets off here, will not do so and legitimately reduce what they have to pay. It is the system itself that allows them to do so and their advisors would be derelict in their duty if they did not facilitate it.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Sooty's Mum
    Love rating 19
    Sooty's Mum said

    Comptroller you have missed out National Insurance which is another tax. The ceiling has been removed on this so higher rate tax payers actually pay 58%. This is an invisible stealth tax which is never mentioned but that is all that it is.

    Maggie Thatcher had several clever ideas which no-one liked and eventually brought her down but Tony Blair introduced all of them without a murmer. I preferred Thatcher, she was far more honest and up front that the lying little toad.

    I do not see why Rooney shouldn't pay tax on all of his earnings as earnings but money allows you to make money. It also allows you to buy better advice. However, even if Rooney is only paying corporation tax it is better than the alternative that happened during the time of 98% income tax, the money went abroad and no tax was paid!

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • comptroller
    Love rating 5
    comptroller said

    The upper earnings limit has not been removed; however the rate for employees and the self-employed above that level is currently 2%, not 8%.

    Report on 25 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • JOHN MAXWELL
    Love rating 56
    JOHN MAXWELL said

    can we blame Wayne Rooney.?it is difficult to imagine he has the intellect to manage his own affairs but due to his talent with kicking a ball he can employ very expensive accountants who are smarter than the government. if blame is to be placed anywhere it is surely with HMRC and the ruling government for allowing wealth to dictate how much tax you pay. i would suggest the government have no real zeal to change things as many of them at some stage will also take advantage of these tax loopholes.

    Report on 26 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rbgos
    Love rating 81
    rbgos said

    Thanks Jabo but I know ALL about IR35, and I'm most careful to ensure that all the work I do is outside it!!

    Report on 26 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Geofffr
    Love rating 0
    Geofffr said

    Tax is a burden we all have to pay,some more than others,some totaly unjustified the tax office some times do go to the extremes on individuals and this really is unjust and wrong and some people are unable to change there tax positions due to the law which seems rediculous.If you can save some money on tax payments and stay within the law I really dont see the problem,and if you have to pay mega tax on your income thats the problem or advantage of been an employee ,if your self employed your looking at it properly .me I hate paying tax but do ...

    Report on 27 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • poppasmurf
    Love rating 31
    poppasmurf said

    electricblue

    No I'm certainly not "pathetic" (name calling really?).

    Yes I've run my own business and no I'm clearly not jealous.

    What is there to be jealous about?

    You've got me stumped there.

    electricblue The country isn't 'financially on it's knees' ""quoted from my posting.

    I meant the DEBT the country is in that unpaid TAX could be spent on reducing the UK's DEBT the bank lot. I wasn't talking about manufacturing or anything else in your reply posting.

    Not everything written on the internet is well thought out, it could be someone after a reaction, or having a laugh.

    Report on 30 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Aware
    Love rating 2
    Aware said

    Yes I consider Rooney and the very many others in this bracket of income should pay a good level of tax.

    The margin between the richer and poorer is ever widening and many do not realise that we are all paid from the same pot. There is a limit to how much is in this pot and someone paid over the top, limits another from a pay rise effectively.

    Personally I find it obcene for anyone to receive such a high return for their labour because it does not warrant such excessive payment. Be it bankers or footballers!

    Someone, somewhere is suffering so that others have a much higher level of existance.

    The crash and unemployment will no doubt sort the chaff from the wheat in the future because the public will not be in a position to pay their wages as has been the case.

    I write this not because of any personal grudge but reflecting upon our own circumstances and I leave this to a reader to ponder on.

    My wife and I are still working self employed to earn enough to live on. We could not afford to pay for a private pension, consequently our state pension for the two of us is a little under £10.000 per year.

    Rooney probably earns something in the region of £13.000.000 per year.

    He earns in one year what my wife and I would receive in 1300 YEARS.

    Yes, there is something wrong somewhere, we should at our age be able to retire and at least eat.

    Rooney and his many others should pay a very high rate of tax which could be then be used for many of us that need it to survive.

    By the way, we are both 78 years old.

    Report on 01 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • TBoneBod
    Love rating 12
    TBoneBod said

    I'm not interested in football; so please forgive any factual errors with companies. When a footballer wears a shirt with Hitachi, or Dulux on it - it is paid for by us, the person who buys these goods. Their advertising budget is gargantuan. The fees paid by TV companies goes towards their wages - TV companies who advertise. Gate fees and season tickets are very expensive; I know there's ground upkeep and staff wages etc. but a large chunk of this goes towards footballers wages.

    Yes they are too high, and their tax bill's are too low. So, if you're not happy about it, vote "with your feet" don't buy goods emblazoned on the backs of footballers, don't subscribe to SkySports. If you want to continue doing the above, you'll have to live with the fact their wages will remain as they are - too high!

    Report on 17 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable)

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3