Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Current accounts

Thinking of switching your current account?

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 26 June 2012  |  Comments 39 comments

Whether you've been affected by the NatWest banking issues, suffered poor service from another bank, or simply want a better return on your cash, you don't have to grin and bear it. Switching to another bank is easier than you might think.

Thinking of switching your current account?

Bank customers are notoriously reluctant to switch current accounts. For some it takes a massive systems failure to prompt them to move. For others, it may be a nightmare afternoon spent being passed around an overseas call centre.

If you’re thinking about making the move, the good news is that the whole switching process is much simpler than it used to be. Here’s what to do:

1. Tell your new bank you want to switch to them

Once you’ve chosen your new current account, tell your new bank that you want to switch and give them the details of your current bank and the current account number.

You’ll also have to fill in a couple of forms and provide two forms of ID.

Once you’ve done that, your new bank should manage the switching process for you and move all your direct debits over to your new account.

2. Tell your employer 

Even though the process is much more automated than it used to be, you should still tell your employer that you’re moving current accounts.

After all, you want to be 100% sure that your pay cheque goes where you want it to go. 

3. Check the banks have done it right

Your old bank should pass all your information to your new bank within three working days. Then all the payments should be moved over within a month. But it’s still worth checking that the whole transfer process has gone smoothly.

Your new bank may be willing to offer you a temporary overdraft if payments have been made from your new account but no salary has yet been paid in.

It’s also a good idea to leave your old account open for a few months just in case anything has been missed in the transfer process.

Choosing the right account

Of course, before you can make the switch, you need to choose a new current account. There are three main issues to consider when you choose a current account:

1. Customer service

Given what’s happened with NatWest, it’s now very obvious that customer service is a very important factor when it comes to current accounts. If customer service is important to you,  your best bet is probably the first direct 1st Account.

That’s because first direct has won numerous customer service awards including the lovemoney.com personal finance awards.

2. Cash rewards

First direct’s other big plus point is that you’ll get a £100 bonus when you have had the account for at least three months. What’s more, first direct is so confident that you’ll like its customer service, it will pay you a further £100 if you close the account before a year is up.

The only drawback is that you’ll have to pay in at least £1,500 every month to get the reward and you’ll be hit by bank charges in the future if you fail to pay in that much.

Alternatively, you could open a Reward account with Halifax and you’ll get £5 a month as long as you pay in at least £1,000 a month into your account. There’s also a £100 bonus if you open the account before July 15th.

3.  Interest on your current account

Most current accounts pay miserly rates of interest or no interest at all. But the Santander 123 Current Account will pay up to 3% interest on credit balances.

If your balance is over £1,000, you’ll get a 1% interest, if it’s over £2,000, you’ll get 2%, and if it’s over £3,000, you’ll get 3%. Interest won’t be paid on any balances over £20,000.

The account also offers cashback on some bills. You’ll get 1% cashback on water and council tax bills, 2% on gas and electricity, and 3% on phone, broadband and pay-TV.

However, you will have to pay £500 a month into your account and more importantly, you’ll also have to pay a £2 monthly fee. No doubt that fee will put a lot of people off.

You could also earn interest if you add the 'Vantage' option to your Lloyds TSB or Bank of Scotland current account. You don't have to pay a fee for this, but you do have to actively ask your bank to give you the Vantage option. You also need to pay in at least £1000 a month and stay in credit.

If you do all of that, you'll earn 3% on balances between £3000 and £5000, 2% on balances between £1000 and £3000, and 1.5% on balances between £1 and £1000.

4. Overdrafts

If you’re someone who frequently goes into the red with your current account, you should also consider what kind of overdraft deal is on offer.

Look at what kind of interest rate you’d pay if you have an authorised overdraft and also what would happen if you went over your approved overdraft limit. You might also be charged fees when you go into the red. Read more about overdrafts in Lloyds TSB and Bank of Scotland revamp overdrafts

That said, the best approach is to try and avoid having an overdraft if that’s at all possible.

Switch! Switch! Switch!

The most important point is that it makes sense to switch if you can. If more people are prepared to switch current account, then the banks will have a bigger incentive to offer decent products to all their customers and provide decent customer service too.

More on current accounts:

Current account fraud: record numbers of us lying to our banks

GetCash: NatWest and RBS unveil cash withdrawals using smartphones

Barclays Feature Store: build your own packaged current account

M&S Bank to launch

Clear your overdraft in three weeks

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (39)

  • bmr
    Love rating 0
    bmr said

    After more than 35 years with Nat West, a piece of appalling service was enough for me to switch accounts. I switched to First Direct. The process was amazingly easy, First Direct gave me a hundred pounds for switching to them, but the best bit is that I can honestly say that the service provided by First Direct is second to none. I only wish I had switched years ago

    Report on 26 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • iambigred
    Love rating 1
    iambigred said

    I switched to First Direct a few years ago from HSBC (same parent company, I know). Since joining their service is absolutely faultless, highly recommended.

    Being able to phone up and get straight through to someone on the phone without any automated voice prompts is brilliant. Why don't more companies do this!

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mikecunliffe
    Love rating 22
    mikecunliffe said

    I've been with First Direct almost from the outset. Only had a couple of problems with them. Recently charged £25 for exceeding my "overdraft allowance" for a matter of 4 days. Only a small amount over as well. I've never had a bank charge in 35 years. I asked them to waive this fee as they do not pay debit interest on the amounts I have sat in my accounts with F.D. They refused.

    Wife and I moved our ISA's away from Nat West as they dropped the rate to existing customers whilst offering higher rates to new customers. I moved the ISA's to Birmingham Midshires and now earn more than a new customer at the Nat West. AND....... I can get at the money if I need to :-)

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Peter Steadman
    Love rating 1
    Peter Steadman said

    I've been with First Direct since the early days and I love it.

    Setting aside my positive experience, I'd be wary of mass switching out of NatWest/RBS. As far as I can see all UK banks have IT systems dating from the 1970s. They have just been upgraded and have had new facilities bolted on piecemeal since then. No bank has had the nerve to go for a complete re-write, exploiting what IT can do nowadays that it couldn't do as well 40 years ago.

    Over a similar period, my employer got through four complete re-writes of our database systems, and three finance suites.

    I'm not shouting too loudly about FD because for all I know another big bank could hit a snag in the coming months. I really hope that doesn't happen. But then, so did everyone at Natwest/RBS.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • teafoo
    Love rating 47
    teafoo said

    Probably what matters most now is what kind of customer service NatWest etc will offer in putting things right.

    Maybe it is possible that this sort of thing can happen to any organisation running computers - rectifying matters is important.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • johncnuttall
    Love rating 9
    johncnuttall said

    Why don't you call this article "Let's cause a run on a British bank"? There will be plenty of people so annoyed at NatWest/RBS over the last week that they will be moving their accounts elsewhere however, the problems were due to inexperienced offshore IT staff not insolvency but that's exactly what they will become if there is a massive run for the door by their customers and, as the bank is pretty much owned by the taxpayer i.e. us, that isn't going to be the smartest move ever.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • spriestley
    Love rating 0
    spriestley said

    Pathetic band-wagon jumping article! Who's paying you to write this rubbish?

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Max and Paddy
    Love rating 0
    Max and Paddy said

    "If customer service is important to you, your best bet is probably the first direct 1st Account." Don't make me laugh! I was with them in 2005 and they were exceedingly rude and phenomenally incompetent. On one occasion, they refused to deal with my complaint because I was using a mobile phone. I was at my mum's and I did not want to give them her phone number because I did not trust them with it. Eventually, I asked their employee, "How long would it take me to move my account away from First Direct?" Quick as a flash, he said, "A lot more time than it would to give me that phone number." First Direct are a disgrace.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • polyphemus
    Love rating 8
    polyphemus said

    I hold no brief for NatWest, but this is hardly a balanced headline. NatWest will now make supreme efforts to ensure there is no repetition and if management has any sense at all it will be trying to make sure it's customer service is as good as it can possibly manage for the foreseeable future.

    Had you been able to forecast the system problem and suggested moving accounts away from NatWest a couple of months ago, it might have been helpful. But of course you can't possibly know when something like this will strike - so which bank should we switch to?

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • JOHN MAXWELL
    Love rating 56
    JOHN MAXWELL said

    i am not a NatWest customer and the only reason i can see for switching accounts is to get some new customer rewards. once you are with the new bank you will become just another number in their books while they make special offers to attract more new customers.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • msharif911
    Love rating 3
    msharif911 said

    As Polyphemus said, this kind of thing could not have been foreseen. But the one thing you can be sure of is it wont happen again to them. How much certainty do you have that it wont happen to one of the other Banks next?

    PS The NatWest debacle is still laughable. The backout plan is the most important part of any Change Management process so it will be interesting to see who was responsible for this or was it a bigger failure that they arent willing to divulge?

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 308
    Iamcoldsteve said

    'Punish Natwest' - why?

    Have you never made a mistake? If you haven't then you MUST be some sort of demi-god.

    Switch for financial reasons, sure, but to punish a bank that made a mistake in introducing new IT, I don't see the benefit or point of it.

    I have been with Natwest for over 20 years and have found them to be no better or worse than other banks who I also have dealings with.

    I normally find Ed's articles well written, interesting and informative. This one should be thrown in the bin for sensationalism and being completely pointless.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bobmattfran
    Love rating 58
    bobmattfran said

    There are fools, there are dangerous fools, there are dangerous politicians who are fools, and then there are fools in banks at executive level who pretend to manage IT systems. My Cat has more intelligence.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mikecunliffe
    Love rating 22
    mikecunliffe said

    I write software - have done for 35+ years. I support a number of my customers who have used my EPOS system for almost 20 years. Whenever I update their software to provide a new facility they request I test that update repeatedly on my development system. When installing on the target (customer) system I first back-up their existing software and their data.

    I've never had a problem following this protocol. Oh, and I'm not based in India - in Lancashire.

    Somebody, probably low-down in the hierarchy cocked-up on this update. But at the top of the structure some senior executive should lose his/her job if reports in the press prove correct. It's been stated that the transaction queue was mistakenly deleted. How the hell could that happen - is this not backed-up prior to the update installation?

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • grahamft
    Love rating 10
    grahamft said

    I've been a NatWest customer for over 40 years. I regularly look at other banks but have yet to find one that has the promise of managing my money better.

    I worked in IT for 37 years, both as a customer and as a software supplier, most of that time on IBM Mainframe systems, exactly like the ones on which this system failure occurred at NatWest. IBM Mainframe users used to have their own in-house staff to look after them, staff who really knew and understood those systems. Whilst I came across incompetent System Programmers from time to time, no organisation would allow a screw-up like this to occur.

    However, most of the IBM Mainframe experts now are like me - retired, and with them has gone all that experience and knowledge. Partly to overcome this loss of experience and partly to pare maintenance costs to the bone, organisation after organisation has outsourced the management of their Mainframe system. Outsourcers, inevitably, just do not have the knowledge and understanding of the systems for which they are responsible like the original in-house teams did.

    Now, I don't know if the problem here is just this; I can only go on what I read on the Web. I do know the software that was at the heart of the problem and I know that it is the most reliable and stable software. The problem is not the software; the problem is, it would seem, if the reports are to be believed, with those appointed to maintain it.

    For NatWest this might turn out to be the most expensive outsourcing deal they've ever done. I wonder what the cost of the compensation is that they will be seeking? Could make the Greek National Debt look like peanuts!

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • petbal
    Love rating 1
    petbal said

    I switched from NatWest which had been my main bank for nearly 50 years to the Coop Bank as my main bank some 2 years ago and found it a pain free process. My reason for switching was that I was damned if I was going to pay Fred Goodwin's pension - although I suppose I am still paying as a taxpayer!

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • keengreen60
    Love rating 3
    keengreen60 said

    Like petbal, I also changed from NatWest to the Cooperative Bank and it has been fantastic. The process of changing was relatively easy, including direct debits etc. I can use the Post Office or many ATMs for access to money, pay in at the PO and get info (e.g. statements) by computer, ATM or phone. The service has always been professional, efficient, polite, friendly and comprehensible. I would recommend this bank to anyone. Any savings go towards a payout twice a year via the Coop membership card.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • charles125
    Love rating 53
    charles125 said

    Many people find it very difficult to change banks because they are up to the hilt on their overdrafts to get by each month! Finding the same level of overdraft facility with a new bank is often very difficult, as they may not quote while you are with somewhere else and in any case will regard it new additional credit and may offer a much lower initial overdraft.

    The headline to this article is grossly unfair. Debacles like with NatWest are very infrequent considering the immense complexity of large banks computer systems. It may be the fault of individual programmers or a team of programmers. No doubt heads have/will roll after this one! There are often only a small number of individuals with the skills to maintain and repair systems like these. But it isn't NatWest's fault it the fault of their IT section, so please put blame where it is due!

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • kittzy
    Love rating 32
    kittzy said

    Get a life, punish Natwest for making a mistake, at least now they have learnt from it, not wise to switch to another comany that hasn't had such an experience.

    You people are demented.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • RedundantHippie
    Love rating 14
    RedundantHippie said

    What staggers me about this debacle is the total lack of a contingency plan. I worked for over 30 years in the IT industry, including some elements of the banking systems. It is a complete myth that banking systems are complicated, particularly current accounts. It's only the scale of them and the implications of them breaking down that is the scary bit. Before anyone does an upgrade the golden rule is to test, test, and test it some more. Then give it to some experts and tell them to break it! Its obvious to me that this testing phase has been skimped over or ignored. Don't be surprised to find some highly paid "IT Consultants" responsible for this. Moving Banks to punish NatWest? Lets hope the next Bank don't use the same system - I bet they do!

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MK22
    Love rating 140
    MK22 said

    How far do you trust HSBC, First Direct's owners? Personally, our family experience of NatWest is that they are excellent, as witness their response to this crisis. Just because they have used the wrong financial software testing software doesn't make them a bad bank. For that I believe you may need to look at Santander or Barclays......

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    I don't rate this opportunistic article very highly; maybe I should switch and read another site?

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mikecunliffe
    Love rating 22
    mikecunliffe said

    Kitzy,

    so many considered posts on here - often from people who have knowledge of this issue; IT staff etc.

    And then there's your comment.

    Need I say more?

    You clearly do.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 109
    Aitken B said

    Time was , a long time ago in a far off country called Britain, that you could trust banks. They had Bank Managers with whom you could have a rational conversation. While banks were always in it for profit at least in the past they acted with a some integrity.

    These times are long gone. The methods they now employ to rip you off are legion. Laggardly processing of fund transfers (a payment goes out of the paying account instantly but it takes days to arrive in the receiving account even if they are in the same bank), unfair and almost certainly illegal penalty charges, Sub Prime mortgages triggering the "credit crunch", using taxpayers' bail-out money to line their own bonus pockets, PPI, fiddling the LIBOR (this is unlikely to result in lower borrowing rates and don't imagine Barclay's were the only ones at it) and too many more to mention.

    Changing from RBS/NatWest to another bank would be jumping from the frying pan into the fire.

    Report on 27 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    Lamentable article to no worthwhile purpose. Not only opportunistic, but also extremely irresponsible of a journalist supposedly a Financial Expert.

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • JoeEasedale
    Love rating 174
    JoeEasedale said

    Totally unbalanced article.

    Pushing Santandross for one, a bank so likely to mess up your account that I would never go there whatever they offered.

    Ignoring the fact that Lloyds have an account that will pay you up to 3% as well, but mentioning Lloyds have charges for overdrawn positions, but ignoring those of Santandross.

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • PDB11
    Love rating 72
    PDB11 said

    I agree with JoeEasedale. Plugging Santander is absurd! Santander is the bank that fills its branches with friendly, helpful staff, and IT systems designed by Dilbert's colleague Mordac to prevent the staff from ever doing anything to help you.

    I left NatWest years ago because they wanted me to use a different telephone banking service for each account - no more "phone this number and tell us what you want doing". I went to Intelligent Finance because they had great offsetting products and (new to me in those days) internet banking. I left IF because they had no branch service. When I needed cash above my card limit, I had to ask a shopkeeper friend to launder a cheque for me! So I went to Santander, where I put up with their atrocious customer service for a couple of years.

    I am now with Lloyds TSB. (I was attracted by the, er, interest on the current account.) They make mistakes like anyone else, but they are helpful and reasonably good at sorting them out. I wonder how long that will last, and where I shall go next. Hey, maybe I'll go back to NatWest!

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Modreduk
    Love rating 9
    Modreduk said

    Punish Natwest if you want but don't punish them for having a few IT problems with a new system. If you are going to think that way then punish google for the problems with their latest android update, apple for their battery issues and microsoft for the bugs in the launch of just about everything. Almost all new IT systems have issues when they are launched and even the most vigorous testing will miss some of them.

    If you want to punish Natwest then do it for a good reason like their treatment of people with basic accounts. I know a few people who have this sort of account and they generally took them out because they needed a simple account for benefit payments etc. Fairly recently Natwest decided to change the rules on their debit cards so you can now only use them in their own cashpoint machines and a other systems such as pay at pump petrol and some shops can no longer accept them either.

    If you want to be able to use your debit card just as easily as everyone else does, Natwest will now charge you a nice little premium of £8. If you want to punish them for something then punish them for this, not for a simple IT problem which could happen to anyone.

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • onlinegenie
    Love rating 2
    onlinegenie said

    Like other posters I work in the computing industry and am amazed that a software upgrade could cause problems of this magnitude. True, faults can arise even after seemingly exhaustive testing, but when that happens you revert to the old system while correcting the newly-found fault. I can't understand why it took so long.

    I am surprised that an earlier poster found First Direct's staff rude. I reluctantly left FD two years ago because the cheque paying in machine at my local branch of HSBC was constantly broken down. I have several cheques a month to pay into my account and this was causing me severe inconvenience. Even when I said I was leaving, FD staff were polite. I ended my conversation with them by saying I would return if NatWest ever bought FD. Yes, that's right - I transferred to NatWest because of computer problems with another bank! But those problems lasted a lot longer than a week.

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • paddydog1
    Love rating 0
    paddydog1 said

    Not about to jump ship after 38 years of good service. As for the comment above about basic accounts and debit cards, never been a problem and as for the £8 charge? Fortunately must be missing something?

    Only two organisations/services I would ever endorse in my fairly lengthy life - Nat west banking/customer service and the AA.

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ed Bowsher
    Love rating 78
    Ed Bowsher said

    Thanks for all your comments. Interesting.

    First up, I should definitely have mentioned the Lloyds TSB interest paying account. I've now amended the article and highlighted the account.

    That said, I don't feel embarrassed by the rest of the article or the headline. I get very frustrated by how few people make the effort to switch account, and I'm hoping that the Natwest debacle will encourage people to move. We need a more competitive banking market where more people are prepared to move current account more frequently.

    Iamsteve asks:

    'have you never made a mistake?'

    Yes, of course, I have. I made a mistake by not mentioning Lloyds TSB in this article. But I also know that readers have the right to stop reading my articles in future as a result. Or they could stop reading lovemoney completely and go elsewhere. Fair enough. that's how the world works. Why shouldn't that philosophy apply to banking?

    Or alternatively, we could all carry on staying with the same bank for 30 years and getting poor service as a result.

    Moving on, John Nuttall suggested that the article would cause a bank run. I think that's extremely unlikely. Largely because customers are so reluctant to switch current account!

    Regards,

    Ed

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MK22
    Love rating 140
    MK22 said

    I have difficulty in believing onlinegenie has worked in the computing industry if onlinegenie is "amazed that a software upgrade could cause problems of this magnitude". I used to work in software development and support for a very large UK company and we were always amazed when a major software upgrade actually worked! There is good financial software testing software out there, but I have yet to come across a test environment that can test software in the way users can!

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Gadgeteer1066
    Love rating 0
    Gadgeteer1066 said

    I have read the comments with interest. I am not with Nat West, but with its parent bank, RBS and First Direct. I have been with RBS almost forever and Williams & Glynn's before it. The reason why I now have a First Direct account is that we have taken out an excellent mortgage product with them. We kept the RBS account open - initially as a temporary measure - but actually find the RBS service to be much better, especially the online stuff.

    First Direct made a complete hash of my direct debit transfers and I am still picking up the pieces, so from my point of view even the most 'highly regarded' bank gets it wrong.

    If the article has any merit it is suggest to people to compare what other products are out there and whether the account they have at present is right for them, not to have a dig at a bank because of an IT hitch because thats just a cheap headline grabbing shot.

    I will be staying with RBS after the switchover to Santander because I have now moved our accounts to a Scottish based account (you can do this, I just don't think RBS are allowed to tell people as part of their sale deal). We will retain the First Direct account because of the mortgage but it will most definitely play a supporting role.

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • hopefultom
    Love rating 43
    hopefultom said

    I am a contented Natwest customer & will be forever grateful for the help & support my wife & I received from our local branch.

    My mother, recently deceased, was in what might be described as the mid stages of dementia. She turned up at the bank, where my wife & I were authorised signatories to her account, calling us " a pair of thieves out to rob her blind ".

    Obviously the manager was involved and, recognising the situation for what it was, rang me and a meeting was urgently arranged.

    No one could have been more helpful, understanding and constuctive in the matter.

    To say the branch manager went the extra mile doesn't even come close.

    @PDB11

    Who are Dilbert and Mordac?

    Have I been asleep?

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • easygoing
    Love rating 156
    easygoing said

    hopefultom. Dilbert is a syndicated comic strip created by American Scott Adams. I can't remember which newspaper has/had it in the UK. Dibert is a software engineer who lives in a cubicle in a large company. The strip highlights all the woes of working in a large corporation and I guess reached its peak when we were all writing mission statements and talking in Burtspeak. (See Private Eye).

    I am sure that there are more knowledgeable people on the subject but Google Dilbert and much will be revealed.

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • onlinegenie
    Love rating 2
    onlinegenie said

    @MK22 - I'll rephrase it then.

    I'm amazed that a software upgrade was allowed to cause problems of this magnitude. The old version should have been re-instated long before it got as bad as it did.

    Report on 29 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MK22
    Love rating 140
    MK22 said

    Yes, onlinegenie, quite happy to accept that they should have backed the upgrade out as soon as they started getting large problems. Done that more than once!

    Report on 29 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • onlinegenie
    Love rating 2
    onlinegenie said

    Me too :-)

    Report on 29 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 308
    Iamcoldsteve said

    Ed,

    You also made another mistake when you quoted me as 'iamsteve'.

    You also made another mistake with this article title (now re-written)

    Report on 02 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name Credit rate (AER)
Based on £1
Overdraft
rate

Based on £1
Apply
now

Santander 123 Current Account

0.0% 0% plus £1.00 per day usage fee Apply

first direct 1st Account

N/A 0% Apply

Nationwide BS FlexPlus

3.0% 0% plus £0.50 per day usage fee Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV1