Van drivers most likely to break the rules of the road

ReenaSewraz
by Lovemoney Staff ReenaSewraz on 02 October 2012  |  Comments 16 comments

Statistics show that van drivers pick up twice as many convictions as car drivers.

Van drivers most likely to break the rules of the road

Van drivers are more than twice as likely as car drivers to receive a motoring conviction, according to research from AA Insurance.

The data showed that on average 15.5% of van drivers have endorsements on their driving licences compared to just 7.4% of car drivers.

Regional breakdown

The pattern is pretty consistent across the UK. Van drivers typically collect more convictions than car drivers wherever they are! Just take a look at the AA’s regional breakdown of drivers who have broken the rules of the road in the past five years:

 

Van

Car

All convictions

 Conviction ratio 

Conviction ratio

North east

15.3%

6.8%

East midlands

15.5%

7.8%

South east

17.4%

7.3%

Greater London

15.1%

6.9%

Scotland

17.2%

7.0%

South west

14.0%

7.6%

Wales

14.1%

7.7%

North west

15.5%

8.2%

West midlands

15.5%

7.3%

UK average

15.5%

7.4%

Source: The AA

Van drivers in the south east tend to carry the most endorsements on their licences (17.4%) while those in the south west are the best behaved (14%).

Car drivers in the north west receive the most convictions and those in the north east receive the least.

But all in all car drivers have something to be smug about. It seems that the age-old van driver stereotype (suggesting those who drive vans are dangerous, inconsiderate road users) is somewhat supported by these figures. Especially if you look at the most common type of conviction picked up by these drivers.

CU80-mobile phone offences

The analysis showed that van drivers were six times more likely to have been caught using a hand-held mobile phone while driving.

The ‘construction and use’ offence is punishable by a fixed penalty notice under the code CU80, which means you pay a £60 fine and get three points on your licence.  

Implications

CU80 will remain on a paper licence for four years before it can be removed but lives on for a further year after that for insurers. This means insurance premiums will be affected long after the offence is committed.

What’s more, insurers tend to view CU80 as worse than speeding offences like SP30. Even though both offences carry the same penalty, insurers penalise mobile phone abuses more heavily.

According to Simon Douglas, director of AA Insurance, motorists can expect their insurance premiums to rise by 9.3% for a single speeding offence but by a hefty 18.5% if they have been convicted of using a mobile behind the wheel.

Douglas explains insurers' statistics suggest that using a mobile phone doubles the risk of being involved in an accident. He said: "You might accidentally drift over a speed limit [but] no-one accidentally uses a mobile phone or sends a text." 

CU80 regional breakdown

Here is the table showing the percentages of mobile phone convictions van and car drivers, insured through the AA, received over the last five years.

 

Van

Car

Mobile phone convictions

Conviction ratio

Conviction ratio

North east

2.7%

0.3%

East midlands

2.1%

0.3%

South east

1.9%

0.3%

Greater London

3.2%

0.5%

Scotland

3.4%

0.5%

South west

1.0%

0.2%

Wales

2.9%

0.4%

North west

2.9%

0.4%

West midlands

1.4%

0.3%

UK average

2.4%

0.4%

Source: The AA

Van drivers making journeys in the south west are the least likely to commit a mobile offence and the same is true of the car drivers in the area according to the figures from the table.

Greater London (3.2%) was pipped to the post by Scotland (3.4%) as the area a van driver is most likely to have been stopped by police and convicted of using their phone behind the wheel. But both figures dwarf the 0.5% of car drivers that were caught doing the same thing in each regions.

The large regional variation could be to do with the fact that there are a greater number of police in urban areas like London who are more likely to witness offenders.

Pinch of salt

In the AA’s research an average of 2.4% of van drivers had picked up the CU80 compared to only 0.4% of car drivers.

Douglas believes the disparity is to do with the pressure van drivers are under to get between jobs and keep customers updated.

But it may be that van drivers are just the ones getting caught. According to an AA/Populus study, 42% of respondents admitted to using their mobile to make calls, text and tweet while driving.

So van drivers aren't the only ones guilty of breaking the rules. They do however make the list of the UK's most annoying motorists - read Britain's most annoying drivers to find out why.

What do you think?

Are van drivers really that bad?  Let us know what you think in the comment boxes below.

More stories on driving:

Britain's most annoying drivers

Five ways to make money from your car

25 ways to cut your car insurance

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (16)

  • RichardSowler
    Love rating 17
    RichardSowler said

    Perhaps the fact that van drivers are professionals and drive greater mileages than car drivers has much to do with these numbers. I recall an insurance company head telling me some years ago that the most significant factor for claims in his experience was the amount of time/distance that the car was being driven.

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • brotheradam
    Love rating 2
    brotheradam said

    Without us van drivers delivering goods to stores, the average car user would not have his candy bars and chips wrappers to throw out his car windows... besides, many times I get cut off at the last minute or have people drive in a way to block me behind sloooww drivers, simply because I am in a van, and not realizing that my blind spots are uge enough to swallow their car or motorcycle up and that they are actually risking an accident by the way they are driving next to me... either drop back or pull forward but don't stay in a blind spot... if Button and other race car drivers have accidents due to blind spots, don't expect us van drivers to be magicians!

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • rick-sal
    Love rating 0
    rick-sal said

    Many van drivers fall foul of the different speed limits that apply to goods vehicles such as transits and sprinters - 50mph (rather than 60mph) in national speed limits and 60mph (rather than 70mph) on dual carriageways.

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rioandthelma
    Love rating 29
    rioandthelma said

    Of course the figures are just nonsense if there is no note of the mileage done by the drivers of cars and vans, many van drivers spend all day driving and delivering while the majority of car drivers just drive to and fro to get to work.

    It would be interesting to see the same figures restricted to the travel to/from work times.

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 109
    Aitken B said

    Comparing statistics is always dodgy but there does seem to be a huge discrepancy between the numbers of mobile phone conviction and the number of speeding convictions.

    There is no doubt that using a mobile phone, even hands free, while driving is always dangerous where, although there are obvious exceptions, speeding is not.

    Traffic regulations are all about safety – they can have no other legitimate purpose. Detecting speeding is easy, you can get a machine to do it although not very well so they have to be supported with a goodly dollop of corruption in the courts. Detecting mobile phone use is much more difficult, it needs a person to observe.

    The advent of Speed Cameras triggered police forces, in the sure and certain faith that they would solve all our road safety problems at a stroke, to remove thousands of road traffic patrols. Hence the low number of convictions for mobile phone use. The result is a much worse road safety record post speed cameras than we had before they were introduced.

    Still, from HMG's point of view there is a positive side. The revenue from speeding fines rocketed to about £100m per year. The insignificant fact that there is considerable evidence that the policy and practice has resulted in more than 10000 (ten thousand) additional deaths on our roads is of no real concern to its proponents.

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Roy Miller
    Love rating 2
    Roy Miller said

    I drive cars and vans regularly - a big factor will be any transit sized van driver is much easier to see using a phone, and there are a lot more Police around in London. These stats will just be used to demonise van drivers all the more by wannabe middle class snobs in Audis ...

    While driving vans its amazing how many people you can see texting while actually driving - spending more time looking down than up at the road, hilarious to sound your horn and watch them drop the phone as they slam on the brakes ...

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Ben Hall
    Love rating 51
    Ben Hall said

    Hmmmm....I don't want to demonise anybody, but as a cyclist I always keep a wary eye on vans...especially white Transit types....I've lost count of the near misses I've experienced with these guys...not gals.... It's like they see cyclists and fall into homicidal rages.

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • derekl
    Love rating 2
    derekl said

    Low levels of conviction in the South west may have something to do with the many areas in which the signal is rubbish, so there is no point in using the phone.

    Also, as noted above, the police there can be thin on the ground, and may prefer to deal with locals using caution, rather than report.

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • travelbugs
    Love rating 0
    travelbugs said

    blind spots in a van can be sorted by turning your neck around to the right and looking out of the window!!

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Motofox
    Love rating 3
    Motofox said

    I do 40000 to 50000 miles a year in my van and only 3000 to 4000 miles in my car that might have something to do with the figures.

    To Ben Hall as a cyclist im not surprise your wary of vans, if your like 99.99% of cyclists out there, when your jumping red lights and turn left from the right side of a vehicle, riding in the dark with no lights, the van going to hurt you more, so try obaying the laws of the road and your'll be fine.

    If you want to look at stats, look at the amount of accidents the police have compared to other road user, it's scary.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 109
    Aitken B said

    Yes Motofox, apparently plod has an unenviable accident record.

    I also understand that they enjoy a spectacularly low rate of speeding fines either on or off duty. Of course they could all just be exceptionally good and careful drivers but I suspect their accident record might put a little “dentette” in that suggestion.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Steviebaby1959
    Love rating 28
    Steviebaby1959 said

    It's all because of White Van Man back in the mid-90's, however, in their defence regarding this article, you haven't given us the statistics for the variety of road laws broken. Speeding, double parking, driving without due care and attention, are all attributable to Corporate van drivers being told to achieve 150 deliveries in a working day, which has steadily grown over the decades, hence more reason to break the law to obtain your bosses objective, texting in your vehicle has only been law since around 2009, so, very recent, and you can't analyse statistics to not having that type of law in the 1990's, there is no comparison.

    Report on 05 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • yocoxy
    Love rating 132
    yocoxy said

    I would imagine that the mileage of a van driver doing local deliveries would be significantly less than a sales rep hacking up and down motorways..

    Report on 11 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sandbar
    Love rating 3
    sandbar said

    I am a motorist, cyclist and have occasionaly driven a van. As a motorist I have cringed or even sworn at the odd cyclist's behaviour and these people let the majority of decent cyclists down. No-one should use this as an excuse to treat these vulnerable road users badly, or worse still dangerously. Regarding blind spots - yes they do occur, especially in a van and a wise drivers are aware of this and try to stay out of them but the situation is not the same as for Jenson Button. Blind spots do cause "racing incidents" in Formula One - but driving on a road is NOT a race and on the road it is therefore the drivers responsiblility to ensure there is no-one in the blind spot before pulling out. The road is a very different environment from the racetrack.

    Report on 11 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • muira
    Love rating 30
    muira said

    just been driving my white van today

    obeying the 30mph sign,on a road that has all subsided due to being adjacent to

    a coastline,battered by the salt water and built on sandhills through a nature reserve,

    and more resembles a roller coaster even at 30mph

    then overtaken by 2 cars,doing probably twice my speed,

    both swan necking to get a view of me,,toddling along

    as though i was breaking the law!!

    and both well into the sunset afterwards

    can't decide which was more dangerous..the speed or the swan necking??

    at least 2 rules broken by 2 drivers..how many points and fines gone wanting there?

    Report on 11 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Captain Blognot
    Love rating 7
    Captain Blognot said

    Comes as no surprise there. Van drivers have a job to do and tight deadlines, Quite often our wacky traffic laws get in the way.

    Report on 12 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Virgin Money Credit Card MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.99% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2