How to beat parking fines

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 07 May 2012  |  Comments 25 comments

One in 12 drivers has beaten fines, despite being at fault. Here are their five best excuses.

How to beat parking fines

Millions of British motorists have escaped parking fines, despite knowingly being in the wrong. At least, that's the conclusion reached by car insurer Sheilas Wheels, following a survey into our parking habits.

Parking (not) fine

Last month, Sheilas' Wheels and market researchers FlyResearch interviewed more than a thousand British adults to find out about their parking habits.

Sheilas' Wheels found that, in the past year, one in ten sneaky drivers (10%) was caught parking illegally, while hoping to dodge a fine or parking warden. What's more, one in 12 Brits (8%) successfully appealed a fine, despite knowingly being in the wrong.

When it comes to dodging regulations, Londoners seem to be the least honest, with one in six (17%) contesting parking tickets even when they knew they were in the wrong.

This research also found that more than a fifth of drivers (22%) believe that flouting parking regulations doesn't count as breaking the law. In the north east, this proportion climbs to nearly a third, so a large minority of Geordies do not believe that flouting parking rules counts as breaking the law.

Highway robbery

Men were more dishonest when dodging regulations, with one in nine (11%) admitting that they often park illegally.

Sneakily, 11% of men have left a parking ticket stuck to their windscreen so that they can park illegally again without being stung with a second fine. Only 3% of women had used this ticket trick.

However, in our defence, many of us are puzzled by parking regulations. Nearly two in five drivers (39%) admitted to often being confused by parking rules, with a quarter (25%) choosing to completely ignore regulations during weekends and bank holidays.

In addition, 15% of motorists told Sheilas' Wheels that they regularly parked illegally, because it was easier to risk fines than to buy tickets or find somewhere else to park.

Other parking tricks include regularly parking in customer-only parking spaces, despite not being a customer, which 7% of us admit to. Another 5% revealed that they often park on single yellow lines, while 13% of drivers get their children to look out for parking wardens while adults are away from the car.

Despite all these tricks and ruses, Sheilas' Wheels found that one in seven British drivers (14%) spent up to £100 paying parking fines in the previous 12 months.

Top excuses not to pay

Some motorists are much better at beating the system than others, especially those repeat offenders who know the system and look for loopholes.

According to Sheilas' Wheels, these are the top five excuses drivers have used in the recent past to avoid paying parking tickets:

  1. The regulations were not clear (9%);
  2. I was gone only briefly (6%);
  3. I was looking for a ticket machine (5%);
  4. I had a personal emergency (4%); and
  5. My ticket went missing (3%).

The first excuse is fair enough: if parking rules are unclear, then any implied contract between driver and parking firm cannot be upheld and, therefore, any fine is invalid. Likewise, if you leave your vehicle and return within the stipulated time limit (usually two minutes), then you should escape scot-free.

However, most parking rules state that you must clearly display a valid ticket inside your vehicle. If you fail to do this, or lose your ticket, then the weight of evidence is against you. Nevertheless, appealing the decision by producing a valid ticket will often win you a pardon.

Appeal and win

Each year, over eight million parking fines are issued, which nearly works out at one for every three UK households. As a result, councils make around £500 million a year from parking penalties, which comes to £15 per driver per year.

Then again, standing firm by appealing a penalty often proves successful. Indeed, a survey by Which? found that more than half (57%) of all formal appeals against parking fines are successful.

In fact, in roughly half of successful appeals, the council or private operator didn't even bother to submit a defence. Thus, if you've made an honest mistake or been treated unfairly, then your fine stands a good chance of being cancelled on appeal.

If you need extra help with appealing against a parking penalty, then try the Appeal Now website. This offers specialist help costing as little as £9.99 from the author of The Parking Ticket Awards: Crazy Councils, Meter Madness and Traffic Warden Hell.

More on cars:

Why your car insurance is still too expensive

Diesels are cheaper than petrol cars...for some of us

A single driving fine will cost you a fortune in rising premiums

The most expensive petrol in the world

Car vs public transport: An old banger is cheaper than the bus!

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (25)

  • PDB11
    Love rating 73
    PDB11 said

    I've only once contested a parking fine. Pay and display, but while I was away the ticket fell off my windscreen. They let me off after I faxed them a copy of the ticket, but sent me a very grumpy "don't let it happen again" letter.

    What I think is unfair is the way councils can declare a "zone" for parking restrictions, or 20mph speed limit, or whatever, and then not have to put up signs anywhere within it. My brother got clamped once, parking on a dotted yellow line, because he'd overstayed the limit. No signs anywhere near the place he'd parked to say what the restriction was, just a "zone" sign several streets away. Harder to appeal when you've been clamped, possession being nine points of the law and all that.

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • johncnuttall
    Love rating 9
    johncnuttall said

    I think the article is mistaken in equating avoiding parking fines with dishonesty. Councils consider motorists to be cash cows and cynically use private sector firms to milk them. A good example is Manchester City Council that has methodically reduced the availability of parking spaces while increasing the hours when parking restrictions are in force. They subcontract out enforcement to NCP.

    Personally, I see their strategy as dishonest and have no moral qualms about avoiding their highway robbery.

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • RichardSowler
    Love rating 17
    RichardSowler said

    It appears that many London Red Routes have not been properly designated. If you are caught on one it is worth checking the Statutory Instruments to see whether the place where you parked was in fact included. This has worked for me in Battersea and King's Cross.

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Harajus
    Love rating 8
    Harajus said

    I completely agree with johncnuttall above. All public servants care about is that enough fines and taxes and fees are paid to ensure their jobs can be paid for.

    On a completely different point though. Cliff, if you feel you have the authority to advise on driving, (a driving instructor's job in my view); you have to take on the responsability of giving out the correct advice. The difference between single and double yellow lines is simply the latter run 24/7 and the former according to nearby plates or signs. Neither allow you to PARK, i.e. leave the car within the inclusive period of the restriction. They simply allow you to STOP for a maximum of two minutes. You cannot leave the driver's seat and you cannot switch off the engine either. Therefore the spirit of the law is just to drop off or pick up passengers.

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 653
    electricblue said

    So the ethical distinction between a corporation avoiding tax and an individual 'beating' a parking fine is precisely what, Cliff? Seems like someone has a busted moral compass

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • easygoing
    Love rating 157
    easygoing said

    I would like to nominate Southend Council as the most evil when it comes to parking enforcement. They use a Smart car with a camera on the top and just drive around photographing people they think are infringing parking regs. No negotiating and no explanations. So people correctly displaying a blue badge get booked as did a man who had to stop in an emergency to change a wheel. Taxi drivers helping the elderly with their shopping also fall foul. You couldn't even stop to refer to a map. Their use of this car goes completely against the guidelines for these vehicles. Just to add insult, the camera cars are allowed to park on yellow lines, block access, park on the kerb and even when one of their drivers was caught using a mobile phone the culprit only got a reprimand.

    At the same time the Council wonders why nobody wants to go to Southend.

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 310
    Iamcoldsteve said

    There is a simple solution to avoiding parking fines.....

    Don't park where you shouldn't.

    I got a ticket the other week when I went for a haircut. I over stayed the time limit for free parking as getting a hair cut took considerably longer than usual.

    I didn't try to squirm out of it. I knew I had overstayed, I got caught, and I paid the fine.

    (The woman who cut my hair was a trainee and took far longer than normal).

    If you get a ticket and you have done nothing wrong, then you should complain. But to moan about a legitimate ticket is just pathetic.

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • MK22
    Love rating 149
    MK22 said

    We had a classic case of "enforcement" recently. Parked in a 3 hour no return within 2 hr area at 0925. Enforcement visit at 0945. We leave at 1010 and return at 1245. Enforcement return at 1315 and place ticket on the car. Sadly for enforcement they cannot prove we were parked there from 0945 to 1315 and Council officers who drew up the scheme (and therefore know what it means) agree with us rather than enforcement (and also say that enforcement should be visiting every hour....). Of course enforcement can only make a profit if they can "catch" people who will roll over and have their tummy tickled. Every time enforcement get it wrong as it our case, they lose money. (Oh and yes, we can prove we weren't parked there when enforcement say we were....)

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ginnymay
    Love rating 36
    Ginnymay said

    My pet hate is the parking attendant who watches you return to the car as the ticket runs out and takes pleasure in ticketing you as you reach the car. They'll find themselves where I work one day...................

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tommills
    Love rating 23
    tommills said

    You are not breaking the law if you park where it is not allowed. You are infringing the regulations imposed by the local Council. There is a difference e.g. the police are not ( and do not want to be ) involved.

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • JOHN MAXWELL
    Love rating 56
    JOHN MAXWELL said

    my local authority offer a 50% reduction in fine if paid within 14 days. they also offer an appeal and this appeal time is not included in the 14 days. they also offer the opportunity to appeal to a national body but do not tell you the 14 day time period is in action. this means if the national appeal is rejected you will be outside the 14 days and the full fine is imposed if you lose that appeal.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Magic-Ian
    Love rating 9
    Magic-Ian said

    John, that is not right. If you make an appeal to the ombudsman or to the council itself then the 14 day period is suspended. If you feel that you have a reason to appeal then do so. Give as much evidence as you can to support your case. I have appealed twice and have won both times. If you fail and the council ignore the 14 day reduction then you have the right to appeal the increase. However I believe that if your appeal is turned down the ombudsman rights to the council telling them that they cannot charge the increase. I had one council try to charge me an admin fee of £25 after I had won my appeal. I wrote back asking for £10 as my admin fee was £35.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • culluding-fool
    Love rating 52
    culluding-fool said

    @easygoing, I agree with you about Southend council, I was constantly fighting with them about parking fines and council tax when I lived there, many years ago now. So, they haven't changed then...

    I once broke down outside the Victoria Lanes market late at night, but that was close enough to home for me to walk home. The gearbox jammed into park when I stopped. Luckily I was at the side of the road at the time. Anyway, I walked home and called out the tow truck first thing in the morning. There was a fine on the windscreen by the time I got back to the car but I just assumed Southend council would understand the situation and cancel it. No chance!

    Another time I was unable to park anywhere near my house because all the residents parking had been taken over by cricket fans. I had no choice but to park on double yellow lines to offload my shopping. Parking ten minutes walk away would mean frozen food thawing out. I got fined! The traffic warden wasn't interested in my problem so I went to court this time. Surely they would understand? Nope! It boiled down to "Did you, or did you not park on double yellow lines?". I never forget those words. No interest at all in my situation at the time. This is just a cash making machine without heart or feelings.

    The weirdest fine I had in Southend was received in the post. My car details all correct, including some number off my tax disc, only it was a fine for parking in a road I had never even driven down. I even visited that road just to make sure I had never been there, and I definitely hadn't been there. I did ask exactly where in the road I was parked but that information wasn't available so I told them that I had never been down that road and wouldn't pay the fine on that basis. They badgered me for about a year or so until I went in to Kwik Fit to have my exhaust sorted out. Then I realised that the few metres of dead-end road where Kwik-Fit was situated could possibly be an extension of the road on the opposite side of the dual carriageway where I was supposed to have parked illegally. I checked when I had my tyres done and it was the same day as the day I received the fine, so I sent off a copy of my invoice to the courts and a copy of the fine off to Kwik-Fit. I left Southend soon after that but never heard anything about it again. The council could have prevented a lot of frustration of they had noted the exact location of my car at the time they issued the fine. The short few metres of road wasn't labelled so I had no idea what the road name was. As far as I remember it was only Kwik-Fit and a take-away shop so it appeared as part of the main road. Anyway, I've never experienced similar problems anywhere else I have lived, so Southend gets my vote as one of the worse. As for Council tax, well there's another story for another time. I have work to do now :-)

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 600
    Mike10613 said

    I got a ticket on Morrison's car park last month. Paying ti took 10 minutes online; an appeal would take forever. They say they only hear one appeal too. I appealed last time because I was a little over a white line into a huge empty loading bay. I lost the appeal. Time's money to many people but not to the council.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • dddc83
    Love rating 0
    dddc83 said

    Check out whether a parking fine is from the council or a private company. Private companies issue tickets, often expensive but with hefty discounts for early payment. They often send official looking demands for money. Many companies will not go to court as it will cost them more than the fine they recover - if they have to pay, that is. Google the ticketing company and check other's reviews on paying or avoiding the fine - often enlightening. I didn't pay my fine for staying just 15 minutes over in an otherwise empty (ish) car park. Several letters arrived about it, escalating the aggressive language last year but none since Christmas. All official advice I could access, even solicitor through house insurance suggested not paying. However, I'm not saying don't pay just make an informed choice not merely paying up and then ignoring.

    Good luck all.

    Report on 09 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • miramoore
    Love rating 9
    miramoore said

    I have absolutely no time nor sympathy for the authorities that devise parking areas in towns and cities: they just make it difficult to find parking places that are free or at a reasonable cost and with an easy-to-use system for paying. Not only do we have to struggle to find a parking place but also find the right change for the machine and check our watches every 10mn to make sure we're not over the time limit.

    No wonder people end up parking illegally!

    We are FORCED into it.

    I believe it's done so that car drivers are fleeced.

    But fewer and fewer people are coming to the city and town centers because of these restrictions and the local econnomy is suffering: revenge!

    Report on 09 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Charliebob2000
    Love rating 3
    Charliebob2000 said

    Yes revenge indeed. Our local town car-park is virtually empty since parking charges were introduced. Most people are parking on the roads into town (only a 10 minute walk), but I guess it's only a matter of time before the double yellow lines appear. Most councils have scored an own goal though, as shoppers migrate to out of town superstores with free parking, and town centres die a slow death with ever decreasing revenues for the said councils.

    Resident parking, why should I have to pay to park my already taxed car (so surely I already have a permit to be on a public road), outside(ish) my own house. OK it's so sombody else doesn't, but the permit should be free.

    I drive for a coach company, we now factor a fine into London quotes, as it is easier, and often cheaper, to park up quickly and take a fine, then it is to try and drive to, and pay for a coach park.

    -- BAN ALL PRIVATE CLAMPPING COMPANIES --

    Bit off topic, sorry. Get off the fine if you can. However:

    Some parking restrictions are there for a good reason, and need to be enforced. The day before I retire, I am going to ram the unlucky inconsiderate sod who has parked in the only coach bay or turning circle for two miles, right into a scrap yard.

    Report on 13 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • haveronjones
    Love rating 7
    haveronjones said

    My current 'pet peeve' is with my local council, which stipulates that parking tickets are not transferable between car parks. Often, I want to park at one end of town to visit Shop A for five minutes - then travel to the other end of town to visit Shop B, also for five minutes. It seems to me only reasonable that I should be able to buy a 30-minute ticket and use it in both car parks. After all, I am still only taking up a single space - and in fact for less time than would be the case if I just left the car where it was for the full half hour. In an odd way I hope that I do get a ticket for this transgression someday, purely in order that I can challenge the stupid rule! I really cannot see any justification for it at all.

    Report on 13 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • silkycat
    Love rating 38
    silkycat said

    I wouldn't go to Southend either!

    Report on 19 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • spider589
    Love rating 4
    spider589 said

    Stupid councils can't see the link between eliminating all the short-stay free parking and the declining health of the small retail businesses in the city centres, (which are increasingly becoming soulless corporate identikit clones of each other, where only the few big names survive) - if you think Southend is worth avoiding, try Hanley, or Stoke on Trent City Centre, as it is now known!

    Report on 20 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 373
    CuNNaXXa said

    What really gets my goat is the Non Transferable parking ticket. I remember when we used to park in Fareham, people would often give you their ticket, which still had hours to run, then the Council made tickets Non Transferable.

    Now if people are moaning that flouting parking laws is unjust, how unjust is it to tell someone that the parking spot they have paid for cannot be given over to someone else before the ticket expires. Surely charging twice for the same spot is illegal, isn't it?

    Oh, and we should remember that the Councils own NOTHING. Everything THEY own, is actually owned by the TAXPAYER. We paid for those parking spaces, construction and all, so they belong to us. Now we probably expect our councils to manage these spots in a reasonable manner, but when they start managing them unreasonably, we have to question whether a council is working for us, the community, or for their own selfish ends.

    (Many councils work for their own ends, seeing the community as nothing more than an inconvenience).

    I have to say, though, that the car parks I use in my area are very competitive indeed. £1 for all day parking, or 50p for two hours cannot be argued with. Also, Springfields operate a pay on exit policy, so you don't overpay in advance, and if your stay is less than twenty minutes, you don't pay anything. Oh, and if you lose your ticket, it costs just £2 to exit the car park.

    Obviously, Springfields only charges for maintenance, yet this is the ideal way to charge for parking. Obviously, if you run a car park for profit, this method is not ideal, because you will only make money for genuine parking, and cannot capitalise on people who overpay (pay for four hours but only use one or two of those four hours, allowing you to rent out the spot to someone else while still earning from the previous tenant).

    One of the most stupidest schemes I have seen in operation is the one in Gosport. You have to put 50p in to the machine, which then gives you a ticket, and your 50p back. Why even bother powering these machines, which costs the taxpayer money to run, when it doesn't earn any money whatsoever. This is council lunacy gone overboard.

    Report on 20 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • edwardmk2879
    Love rating 57
    edwardmk2879 said

    spider 589 has made an excellent observation. Plymouth City has a new shopping centre that is popular, but the usual very high charges. The much smaller local town of Saltash noticed that all traffic was passing them by and going to the new Drake's Circus Shopping Centre. So they decided to try dropping parking charges in Saltash. Apparently it's worked a treat. The councils need to realise they are in competition with other councils. How bad do their high streets have to get before they realise they are killing them by their own hand? Both shoppers and business owners are fed up with no-where to park and sky high fines. I know a local business owner who had to move out from the city centre as the council restricted his loading and unloading outside his own premises. Rates, taxes and parking fines seem to only ever go up, and that is not sustainable.

    Report on 20 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • su51
    Love rating 1
    su51 said

    tns or sovereigns on you tube

    Report on 15 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • audaciousangel
    Love rating 1
    audaciousangel said

    Penalty charge notices are an offer of contract, although they won't tell you that. You have three days to accept (although who would) or decline, or better yet deliver it to the council offices and say that you do not wish to contract with them. If they try to enforce it, quote the Bill of Rights Act 1969, “That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.” Council are acting illegally, and technically we could sue them for misrepresentation. I'll be taking my claim to Queens Bench, as it is a breach of my human rights in that they failed to disclose the true facts.

    Report on 11 January 2013  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Fifitrix
    Love rating 0
    Fifitrix said

    Your article is factually incorrect when you state "This research also found that more than a fifth of drivers (22%) believe that flouting parking regulations doesn't count as breaking the law."

    Parking somewhere which earns you a PCN is not breaking the law. Parking offences were decriminalised some years ago now.

    Many Councils actually do break the law by not having the DVLA and DOM specified information and format on their tickets! Also, if you are a resident in an area and you are parking in Council owned Car Parks, you actually own those car parks anyway - the Council is a trustee and they are answerable to us all and are directed by us all. We entrusted Councils to look after our affairs, and they abuse our trust basically by levying unlawful local parking taxes.

    Report on 11 January 2013  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using Three Kings