Could you drive an electric car?

Felicity Hannah
by Lovemoney Staff Felicity Hannah on 11 February 2012  |  Comments 30 comments

Would you consider an electric car? And would it save you money?

Could you drive an electric car?

If you haven’t noticed the rising price of fuel then that must be because the chauffeur fills the car up for you. Petrol prices are rocketing and it’s already changing the way many of us drive. 

Back in the year 2000, petrol prices were about 77p a litre, which means they’ve nearly doubled in 11 years. A survey by Hastings Direct found that more than three-quarters of motorists are already driving less, including 1% who’ve already given up their cars completely. 

In fact, one in three of the respondents said they were considering a hybrid or electric vehicle as their next car. So, would you? 

The reasons

Electric cars can be a lot cheaper to run. Take the Nissan Leaf. Its full range is about 109 miles, which it can achieve on just over 30 kWh. If you charge the car at night, that whole journey could cost as little as £1.30. 

What’s more, electric cars aren’t charged for Vehicle Excise Duty, they’re not subject to the London congestion charge and many councils offer free parking for these green vehicles. 

Then, of course, there are the environmental benefits. They don’t produce exhaust fumes when they’re driven, helping maintain the air quality in urban spaces. And if the UK can increase the amount of renewable energy it generates, then that will lower the environmental impact of electric cars even further. 

The help 

On the downside though, electric cars aren’t cheap to buy and they’re not as convenient as more traditional vehicles. But you can get help. In particular, grants towards the cost of certain models, up to 25%, capped at £5,000. 

It’s available on the following 10 vehicles, and has just been extended to cover electric vans. 

  • Mitsubishi iMiEV
  • smart fortwo electric drive
  • Peugeot iON
  • Citroen CZero
  • Nissan Leaf
  • Tata Vista EV
  • Toyota Prius Plug-in
  • Vauxhall Ampera
  • Chevrolet Volt
  • Renault Fluence

Van drivers can receive 20% of the cost of their vans, capped at a maximum of £8,000. 

You don’t have to fill out any forms or go through an application process to receive this funding. The car dealer will sort out the paperwork and automatically deduct the grant from the price you pay. 

However, this grant has only been agreed until the end of March this year. After that it will be reviewed and could go up, down, or be cut completely. 

The power 

Before you decide that an electric car is right for you, you need to work out how practical it is. 

You can plug your car in at home and charge it overnight, when you might be able to benefit from cheaper electricity, depending on your tariff. A standard plug socket can be used, although there are dedicated home chargers that can speed up the process. 

But if you need to charge when you’re on the road, it gets a bit tougher to manage. Some cities, including London, Manchester and Milton Keynes, are installing plug-in points under the government’s Plugged In scheme. You’ll need to research the areas you drive most often to see if there are recharging facilities available. 

If your daily commute can be done on one charge, then you shouldn’t have any trouble, just power back up each evening. 

The insurance 

Another problem is that  insuring an electric car can be a little complicated. 

That’s partly because the batteries are very expensive and usually leased. As a result, some insurers are charging high premiums. Yet others are offering low quotes because most electric cars have a low maximum speed. 

As with any insurance product, you need to compare prices to find the best one. It’s also important to make sure you can find and afford the cover before you buy the car, so compare prices first. 

The conclusion 

So if you’re running a daily commute in and out of the centre of London, then an electric car will probably save you money, even if you have to pay more for it to start with. 

However, you might find that an electric car simply isn’t practical just yet, as there hasn’t been sufficient mainstream uptake to make them easy to run. But that will probably come in time. 

Until then, it could be worth considering a hybrid vehicle, which uses a petrol or diesel engine along with a battery. The battery powers the car at slower speeds and recharges as you drive, which makes it very fuel efficient. 

Some hybrids can also be plugged in to recharge, meaning they could qualify for the Plug-In Car Grant if they meet the other criteria. You’ll also pay less road tax because the emissions are lower than a standard car. 

A hybrid or plug-in hybrid could be a good compromise if you want to lower your environmental impact but aren’t ready for a fully electric car. 

However, the prices of both these kinds of vehicles are so much higher than many similarly-sized vehicles. You’d have to be sure you were going to save a sizeable amount on fuel for it to be worth it. 

If petrol prices carry on rising, I suspect that more people will switch from their cars completely and just use buses, trains and bikes. 

Do you drive an electric car? Have you taken one for a test drive? Did you decide it wasn’t for you? Share your plug-in car experiences in the comments below.

More: The most popular car of 2011 |  Car insurance rip-offs, scams and lies | Get cheap car insurance with lovemoney.com

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (30)

  • monch1985
    Love rating 2
    monch1985 said

    Also bear in mind the storage batteries need replacing every 10 years and they're multiple thousands of pounds

    Report on 11 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 311
    Iamcoldsteve said

    All you have to do is to look at the purchase price, and residual value (with a battery that will probably be in need of replacing at a cost of several thousand pounds) to see that the difference between this and a 'normal' car is so large that you will NEVER recoup this initial outlay, no matter how far you drive. The batteries also degrade in performance over time, so the quoted range is for new batteries - what about a year old, 2 years old.....?

    The extra money would pay for a LOT of petrol / diesel. And you know what you are getting, and repairs and maintenance would also be easier, quicker and cheaper with a conventional car.

    They just do not make financial sense.

    Also, they ABSOLUTELY do cause pollution (unless you live in Norway, for example) - albeit from a power station many miles away. But to say they are 'green' is misleading. The materials the batteries are made from (for example) can hardly be described as green. They are precious and limited supplies of these materials, some are hazardous.

    Then you have to remember to charge it up at night, probably every night, and if you forget, there is no nipping to the fuel station on the way to work. Normal recharging takes several hours.

    Also, there are very serious safety issues with these cars in the event of crashes. Issues that have NOT been addressed by the Industry. The NCAP collision rating and a pile-up on the motorway give VERY different results to the car and the people.

    Suffice to say that I have worked on developing electric vehicles from concept to production for an international car manufacturer and I WOULD NOT buy one.

    Final comments, limited range. What about when you need to go further afield than your 'normal' commute etc? Do you have to have another car for long journeys, or do you hire a car, or what?

    The EU commisioned a report on the effects of widespread use of electric cars. As it didn't come out favourably, they suppressed the report. (you probably won't even have heard of this report because it was so damning)

    Electric cars are NOT the way forwards, even though some Gov'ts actively promote them - as they are serving their own agenda.

    As I work within the industry, I probably know MUCH more than most about electric cars, and as I said early - I wouldn't buy one.

    Report on 11 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • mikecunliffe
    Love rating 22
    mikecunliffe said

    When batteries become removable and pitched at a price allowing two sets to be owned per vehicle - I might be more interested. I've installed solar panels at home and would love to use the energy generated to recharge one set during sunlight hours and use the other set for driving.

    Now THAT'S green.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    I drove a milk float once; it turned he right off...

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Escapeman
    Love rating 13
    Escapeman said

    Well, I *would* buy one, though it would a Smart (tm) sized one, not a Leaf or Prius behemoth.

    Bombing up and down a motorway with a pure electric car is nonsense. There, electric cars cannot compete.

    Tottering to and from work 5-10 miles away, doing a shopping run, taking daughter to violin lessons is more like the use an electric car should be put.

    Battery technology is leaping forward in huge leaps and bounds. True, they do use (recyclable) exotic materials. Some are now "guaranteed" for 10 years.

    Using "Economy 7" electricity evens out the demand from power stations, so more of them operate at better efficiencies for longer.

    But the really interesting thing about the mass take-up of electric cars is that they could fed power *back* to the grid eg at breakfast time. It will require smart meters and smarter controls to ensure the car sacrifices say 20% of the energy stored. This you could get paid for that "service" like the feed-in tariffs for solar PV.

    Again, it helps keeping power stations running at optimum leves for longer, saving energy.

    Finally, electric energy can come from many sources, not just carbon based. Personally I am in favour of nuclear power (whole new subject - look up thorium reactors) as it generates arguably less CO2 over its life. But then again, where electrical energy comes from is another debate.

    Suggest to all to have a read of David McKay's (Free downloadable) book "Sustainable energy without the hot air". It covers this subject well.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • oldlowie
    Love rating 9
    oldlowie said

    I'm not sure about the charge-up cost. My EDF standard tariff costs just over 13p a Kw/h, 30 of these for a charge would be £3.90. That's 2/3 of a gallon of fuel, and a little diesel car (costing a fraction of an electric car), could get about 40 or so miles on that...

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    A study in the USA, which was never argued with concluded that the environmental impact of driving a Hummer was, in whole life terms, LESS than that of driving a Prius. The scrappage scheme typified the illogical excuses which we are given for these supposedly environmentally friendly changes in the ways we are expected to purchase and run our vehicles. We build durable cars which now are so sophisticated that they are scrapped because some extortionately expensive electronics has failed. We adopted catalytic converters at the expense of lean-burn technology and lost up to 15% economy as a result. Anyone who has to park their car on the street cannot simply plug in to charge. We would all save a vast amount of fuel if we could adopt engine pre-heaters like they use in Canada yet they are never talked about and not available as options in Europe. Politicians are stupid; we had John Prescott as Transport Secretary, a man whose expertise was in meat pies rather than automotive technology. It's all a mess of lies and political expediency and I for one will stick with my ten year old petrol car with a clear conscience.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • nosbort
    Love rating 125
    nosbort said

    At what rate of penetration do you think think that the Government will realise that they can't allow the excise duty loss on fuel to continue and start to tax electric vehicles to make up the difference?

    You would be stupid to base a purchase decision upon the lack of VED and cheap fuel, add to this the environmental damage caused by the production and disposal/recycling of the batteries and the inefficiency of the transport of electricity causing an increase in pollution, albeit somewhere else, and these toys will disappear. The ONLY answer if you want to reduce pollution due to vehicles is to use Fuel Cell technology and import the liquid hydrogen from somewhere that can produce it from a geothermal or hydroelectric source.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • UpHillAllTheWay
    Love rating 38
    UpHillAllTheWay said

    Go Nosbort!

    I was going to make the same point. I remember when diesel was attractive because it was about half the price of petrol and gave better MPG to boot, with the consequence that it became more popular. More popularity drove innovation in diesel engines, and some years ago, the Le Mans 24 hour race was won by a diesel car. But now that the popularity of diesel has made it mainstream and tax revenue was being lost on petrol, the authorities have increased tax on diesel to the point where it's more expensive than petrol. The same will happen if electric vehicles ever approach a level that will be worth taxing.

    Perhaps a better alternative would be to look at technologies that offer lower prices, and are unlikely to become mainstream. LPG, for example, has been around for a while, but has never really taken off in a big way. Several companies hold patents for the conversion of diesel engines to LNG - Westport and Omnitek, among many others that come up with a simple Google search, so some interest is being shown there.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • UpHillAllTheWay
    Love rating 38
    UpHillAllTheWay said

    Electric cars are run on electricity from generators that are driven by steam turbines. How about cutting out the middle man (your electricity salesman), and putting a steam turbine in your car.

    There's something to be said in favour of electric cars, though - Nuclear power stations generate about as much power during the night as they do during the day, but thye demand for electricity is during the day - so what happens to the power generated at night? In Wales (Snowdonia), there is a huge engineering installation called Electric Mountain, where they use excess power at night to pump a lake (of water) from the bottom of a valley to the top of a mountain, then during the day, when demand is high, they let the lake run down to the valley again, generating hydro electricity from it to boost supply. You can visit Electric Mountain, and for anybody with an engineering interest, it's an interesting and impressive visit - but maybe charging electric cars at night would make nuclear generation a lot more viable.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Abers
    Love rating 1
    Abers said

    I bought a Nissan Leaf in November last year. I love it - it drives beautifully and apart form the lack of noise, which is a bonus, you could be driving a petrol or diesel car. There is definitely no difference in performance.

    My commute is around 20 miles per day so often do not charge every day and when I do I just plug in overnight at home. Easy!

    And boy do you notice the difference in not going to the petrol station. Apart from the cost you don't have to get cold whilst filling up and wait in queues to pay!

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • tommills
    Love rating 23
    tommills said Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 311
    Iamcoldsteve said

    £26,000 for a leaf - including Gov't discount.

    In the same class of car you could buy a much better spec'd, more comfortable, better performing car for half that.

    And 13K would buy a lot of fuel - enough for about 100,000 miles at 45mpg and £1.3 / litre petrol cost. Most people who buy a new car will not drive any where near this distance whilst they own it.

    I think I can rest my case that they are not financially viable.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • realitywins
    Love rating 60
    realitywins said

    Electric cars are all a load of green hype. There would be no saving and horrendous inconvenience with the short range of these follies. Thanks for the Reality, tommills, your link explains this in more detail.

    Even the so called green aspect is a fallacy as over 75% of the electricity supplied by the grid is from coal and gas fired power plant. For the future there is still going to be very little electricity from other than gas, coal and nuclear, if the lights are to stay on and electicity prices are to remain affordable, that is. Wind and solar power are hugely expensive, and intermittent.

    lamcoldsteve is quite right, the cost-benefit just doesn't work out favourably by a long chalk. Either get a much cheaper petrol or diesel car for half the price or buy a more luxurious car and benefit from the comfort, range, performance and street cred.

    BTW - the latest ful years HadCRUT3 data shows that the mean global temperature of the planet was the same 14.34 deg C in 2011 as it was in 1997. That's right - no global warming for 15 years. Who wants to be green anyway? It's all a tax hike so what's the point? If we need to lobby, it is for reduced taxes on petrol as the cost without tax is still only about 80p per litre.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    Actually the TAX proportion of UK petrol cost is around 80p per litre.

    Report on 14 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    The technology is in the dark ages. This will be a fad until the technology really suits this application.

    You also have an additional inefficiency converting electrical power to mechanical power, so overall the pollution from the fossil fuel power station increases. I start looking for a petrol station when I have about 100 miles remaining. Surprising how quickly you eat 100 miles when urban driving.

    But hey, they've got to be good because the politicians say so. You know, those idiots who know nothing.

    Report on 15 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    There is nothing wrong with the technology, Nickpike - you don't present yourself as being any better than the politicians if you can't differentiate between the technology itself and the absurd environmental hype. A Tesla makes great sense in California and is an awesome vehicle both in technological and practical terms, whereas a Nissan Leaf is a joke pretty much anywhere in the world with what it offers for the price. Energy conversion factors for electrical vehicles stand up very well so your comment is inaccurate there too. Cheaper and more efficient battery production will eventually sway the balance in terms of whether we can all live with an electric vehicle as our only car. Lets not pretend that we are saving the world and agree that politicians are idiots while we remain objective on the subject. If the Nissan Leaf were £10k and had 100 mile better range, we'd all want one.

    Report on 15 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 311
    Iamcoldsteve said

    Ultimately, if it is all about saving the world, then there is absolutely nothing that we can do unless and until China and the US start moving on carbon reduction.

    Without these taking huge steps, what we do in our little island nation is irrelevant. We cannot make a difference. Some may look at that as defeatist, but it is the truth. However, we can HOPE that we can lead by example and put pressure on others to promote the change away from carbon based fuels, or the reduction in usage. The second is actually begining to be understood in the US with more fuel efficient vehicles.

    Hybridisation can go a long way into improving the situation, even "mild" hybrids offer a good improvement.

    I think that the only truly sustainable fuel will be powered by the Sun, ie grow crops, or electrolyse water to form hydrogen and use it as an energy storage media. There are big issues with both of these, of course. No-one said the answer is going to be easy.

    Report on 15 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    I studied electronics and electrical science in college and worked in that for some time. I wouldn't buy an electric car, but I am in favour of them. The technology is market driven and the Chinese in particular are investing in better vehicle design. They are also investing a lot in solar energy and so it makes sense to keep developing this technology for the future. That means developing new ways to generate electricity. In this country that will probably mean the building the Severn barrage to produce electricity. In China and warmer countries, solar will work. We need better batteries and ways of storing the fuel and further development of fuel cells might lead to a better way of storing energy. This technology is in it's infancy but if you compare the computer technology of the 1980's to that of today we can guess where it might lead. Electric cars are in the Sinclair ZX stage of development; maybe soon we will get the Amstrad 1512 version?

    Report on 20 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tbrake
    Love rating 0
    tbrake said

    230electricblue said:

    "A study in the USA, which was never argued with concluded that the environmental impact of driving a Hummer was, in whole life terms, LESS than that of driving a Prius... It's all a mess of lies and political expediency"

    Never argued with, is that right? A little bit of checking using a well-known search engine would have quickly shown you that you are just as guilty of adding to the "lies and political expediency". That so-called "study" in 2007 put out by CNW Marketing Research was comprehensively debunked within two months as bad science and propaganda!

    http://www.pacinst.org/topics/integrity_of_science/case_studies/hummer_vs_prius.pdf

    Report on 20 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • easygoing
    Love rating 156
    easygoing said

    The way I see it is that we are held to ransom by the oil and gas producing countries. One day they may well decide to turn off the tap to teach us a lesson for what ever political reason. Therefor it would be desirable to be self sufficient for power generation. That goes for food production too. Makes sense to me to go nuclear. Battery development has come in leaps and bounds over the past ten years and there will be a time when costs will come down. To carry on thinking that the oil will be available to us for ever is short sighted and as oil prices increase as they most surely will, then electric will become the only way.

    Trying to compare a milk float to todays modern electric cars is ridiculous.

    Report on 20 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ManyDollarz
    Love rating 0
    ManyDollarz said

    Top journalism strikes again.

    Would you consider a pogo-stick? And would it save you money?

    Do you drive a pogo-stick? Have you taken one for a test drive? Did you decide it wasn’t for you? Share your pogo-stick experiences in the comments below.

    LoveWastingMoney.com

    Report on 20 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    I don't really care that the Hummer vs. Prius calculation was supposedly debunked because, like Iamcoldsteve, I work with engineers in the motor industry, including Toyota and Lexus and all the ones I have talked to agree that the Prius and similar vehicles are, in whole life environmental terms, a joke. Liquid hydrocarbon fuels can be synthesised so the issue of oil 'running out' will never arise.

    Report on 26 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • easygoing
    Love rating 156
    easygoing said

    So why are we not doing it? My guess is that the cost will be prohibitive. So engineers in the motor industry think oil is the only way - well that is a surprise. We need to diversify and keep our options open. If the oil tap is tuned off how long will it take to start producing synthesised fuels and in what quantities?

    As for me I would welcome an electric car for my needs in retirement.

    Report on 26 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    Hey electricblue

    You said

    "There is nothing wrong with the technology, Nickpike - you don't present yourself as being any better than the politicians if you can't differentiate between the technology itself and the absurd environmental hype"

    Its old hat lead acid cells, low on power for their weight and size. They have short lives and cost a load to replace. And for what, a crumby 100 mile range. If this technology was feasible and economical, how come there is a government hand-out? And that's immoral. Subsidies come from the poorly paid taxes to help those who can afford a new car. Not nice. Hydrogen gas cells woulf make more sense, if they can be made for the right price.

    "A Tesla makes great sense in California and is an awesome vehicle both in technological and practical terms, whereas a Nissan Leaf is a joke pretty much anywhere in the world with what it offers for the price."

    I live in Britain.

    "Energy conversion factors for electrical vehicles stand up very well so your comment is inaccurate there too." There is still an additional inefficiency causing more pollution (unless we are 100% pollution free, ie nuclear)

    "Cheaper and more efficient battery production will eventually sway the balance in terms of whether we can all live with an electric vehicle as our only car."

    Well lets wait until that happens then. At present they are no good.

    "Lets not pretend that we are saving the world and agree that politicians are idiots while we remain objective on the subject. If the Nissan Leaf were £10k and had 100 mile better range, we'd all want one."

    Saving the World? Don't make me laugh. Our pollution levels are next to nothing compared with China, USA and India. Get them to join in and I might think about it. Latest evidence shows global temperatures a have remained static for years

    http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02148/RSL-HouseOfCommons_2148505a.pdf

    See in particular the graph on page 11.

    My view is that an increase in CO2 creates more biomass which in turn controls CO2 levels. Global warming is a political/ financial scam.

    .

    Report on 26 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • JOHN MAXWELL
    Love rating 56
    JOHN MAXWELL said

    the theory of an electric car is good for me as a low mileage & short journey driver, but i live on the 2nd floor of a block of flats and have no access to an electricity connection. the part i find completely perverse is that this wonderful idea has to be subsidised with tax payers money. why should i pay for something i can't use? how many calculations of the economic benefit of an electric car take into account the cost of battrey replacement/hire cost?

    Report on 27 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • easygoing
    Love rating 156
    easygoing said

    It isn't so unreasonable that the government should invest in kick starting electric cars. (Sorry no pun intended) The motor industry has an appalling record when it comes to innovation in anything that threatens their cosy world. There have been a number of good alternatives and innovations that have been produced in the past, bought up by the motor industry and buried.

    You may mock Nissan but they have taken up the challenge by investing heavily in battery technology and producing a viable vehicle. It may not be pretty and may be expensive but new innovations are always expensive to start with. You only have to look at the computer world to see how investment and innovation has brought down the cost of memory and hard drives for example.

    Report on 27 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • krustallos
    Love rating 39
    krustallos said

    The problem with synthesised fuels is that they're either made from other fossil fuels or from biomass, and if they're made from biomass that takes land away from food production pushing up the price of food (which will probably lead to starvation in the Third World).

    Personally I cycle most places and I'm broadly in favour of anything that doesn't pump fumes into my lungs, so electric cars are OK with me as a 'passive smoker', but buying one would be uneconomic and impractical at present.

    No doubt the technology will develop and costs reduce if the market leans, or is pushed, that way, but in terms of the environment generally it would be far better if we could arrange to live and work in closer proximity so that this insane daily commute became less necessary. We'd all save time, money and stress. There are plenty of things we really need energy for in our society. Trundling miles back and forth every day shouldn't be one of them.

    Report on 27 February 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    A system is being trialled which uses solar power to synthesise hydrocarbon fuels using methane and CO2. The likelihood is also that synthetic fuels can be generated from waste products using huge vats of algae on an industrial scale.

    Report on 06 March 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MeyouandI
    Love rating 0
    MeyouandI said

    This article prompted me to look at some specific costs of electric driving, mainly for my own interest. Let me know if you find it useful or lacking! 

    A useful comparison between petrol/diesel and electric driving per year in UK units:

    Average 30 miles /day is approx 10,000 miles/year.

    Fuel Cost:  

    Petrol:  £1.30/litre

    Miles/Litre= 10  for 45 Miles/Gallon

    per mile = £ 0.13   

    per Year = £1300 

    Electric 

    per mile = £0.03 

    per Year = £300

    Savings = £1000 per Year on fuel

    Additional savings:

    Road Tax = £150

    So at least a savings of £1150 per year.

    What can reduce this is the added depreciation of the battery pack (£1000 per year?).

    I personally think that the battery is where most buyers should scrutinise. A system where the customer does not own the battery pack could become the norm. This also enables battery swapping at filling stations to occur.The life time of the electric motor and drive train is expected to be much longer than that of conventional petrol/diesel cars. The electric car owner could then stand to benefit from lower overall depreciation in an system where the battery is swappable and leased.

    Battery Lease cost per month is quoted as £65 for Renault and others.

    Battery Lease / year = £780

    So Basic savings per year = £1150 - £780 = £370

    A battery lease car like the electric Renault Zoe or the Kangoo Van is  £13,600 after UK government grant.

    The equivalent diesel van is £9000.

    Thats a difference of £4600.

    So the electric version would pay back the difference in at least 12 years.

    Also factor in reduced maintenance costs for electric motor vs combustion engine per year. 

    Since you can expect longer life-times out of your electric vehicle (without battery) compared to petrol/diesel than a payback time of 10 years is possible.

    Over the next 10 years, the value of electric driving will only improve.

    All in all, if you can afford the extra 50% upfront costs, you don't stand to lose very much in £'s .

    Report on 13 April 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Virgin Money Credit Card MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.99% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4