Renting a car is cheaper than buying one

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 07 January 2012  |  Comments 26 comments

When you add up all the costs, it can be miles cheaper to lease a car!

Renting a car is cheaper than buying one

John Paul Getty, the oil tycoon said to be the richest man in history, once remarked:

“If it appreciates, buy it. If it depreciates, lease it.”

In other words, the billionaire strongly recommended buying assets that increase in value (such as shares and property), while renting assets whose worth tends to fall over time.

Getting behind the wheel

Taking Getty's advice, I've never bought a new car (although I once used my bargaining skills to buy my wife a new car at a big discount to the list price). This is because the biggest cost of owning a car is depreciation: the financial loss due to a vehicle's value falling as it ages.

Although depreciation varies greatly across makes and models, a typical car will lose approximately two-fifths (40%) of its value in the first year. After three years, the average vehicle will have lost around three-fifths (60%) of its list price.

For this reason, my family tends to buy nearly new cars, allowing the previous owner to take the biggest to hit to depreciation in the first year or two.

Renting your road

However, there is another easy way to avoid depreciation and manage the risk of big repair bills. This route involves renting or hiring a car for two or three years through what's known as personal leasing.

In effect, a lease is a long-term rental deal, through which you drive a car for an agreed period at a fixed monthly cost. Leasing cars is very popular in the USA, where drivers worry more about being seen in the latest model than they do about owning the metal! Nevertheless, British motorists are becoming keener on this 'renting route to the road'.

How leasing works

With a leasing contract, you do not end up owning the vehicle at the end of the contract.

Instead, you pay a fixed monthly amount during the contract's term, which can include servicing, repairs and MoT costs. However, when the contract ends, you must return the car in good condition. Thus, when your lease runs out, you'll need sign a new lease in order to get into your next vehicle.

If you cover a lot of miles, then leasing can work out cheaper than buying a car. However, if you exceed a certain mileage (say, 10,000 miles a year), then the owner -- the leasing company -- will charge you a per-mile penalty for exceeding this limit. In addition, you must pay for any damage you cause to the car, which must be returned in good condition.

Before you can drive away, leasing companies demand an upfront deposit, usually three monthly payments. This initial deposit is not refundable.

In short, with leasing, you dodge depreciation and hand over the 'resale value' risk to the leasing company. What's more, it's up to the leasing company to sell the car to its next owner, taking away further hassle.

Renting versus leasing

The monthly repayments to lease a car are usually much lower than those needed to buy it. In some cases, they can be less than half the repayments for a loan. However, over two or three years, the total cost can be higher, because you don't have a car to sell on when your contract expires.

What's more, it's normally cheaper to buy cars which hold their value well and have strong resale values. On the other hand, it's usually better to lease vehicles which depreciate rapidly.

By the way, it's important to watch out for VAT (Value Added Tax), which adds 20% to the monthly rentals paid by private motorists. Also, you'll need to add on the cost of car insurance.

In its last survey, consumer magazine Which? reviewed 12 cars to find out which are cheaper to buy than to lease. Here's the magazine's advice:

Make and model

Buy or lease?

Audi A4 Avant 2.0 TDI 143 SE

Buy

Audi TT 2.0 TDI Quattro

Buy

Citroen C4 Grand Picasso 1.6 HDi SX

Buy

Honda Jazz 1.2 i-VTEC S

Buy

Jaguar XF 3.0D V6

Buy

Mazda 2 1.3 TS2 5-dr

Buy

Renault Modus 1.5 dCi 86 Dynamique

Buy

VW Golf 2.0 TDI 110 SE 5-dr

Buy

VW Scirocco 2.0 TSI GT (DSG)

Buy

Honda CR-V 2.2 i-CTDi SE

Either

Nissan Qashqai 1.5 dCi Acenta 2WD

Either

Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Zetec

Lease

Notes

  1. 1.    Based on three years and 36,000 miles.
  2. 2.    Loan interest charged at 8.9% APR.
  3. 3.    Costs exclude fuel, servicing, Vehicle Excise Duty ('road tax') and car insurance.

As you can see, Which? recommends buying nine of these 12 cars, as most are family or upmarket cars which hold their values well. Of the remaining three, only the Ford Mondeo is best leased, but it's a close call for the Honda CR-V and Nissan Qashqai.

In general, mass-market models which are popular with company fleets usually work out much cheaper to lease than buy. Conversely, vehicles which hold their value well (including upmarket German cars from the likes of Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz) usually work out cheaper to buy.

In summary

If you don't have a big deposit to put down to buy a car, or you want to bring down your monthly repayments by between a third (33%) and half (50%), then personal leasing may be just up your street.

Likewise, leasing allows you to get behind the wheel of a nicer car, without worrying about the risks of ownership, particularly depreciation. In effect, leasing can mean fixed-price motoring -- driving a new car every two to three years with complete peace of mind!

More: Get quality quotes for car insurance | Four reasons why fuel prices will rise | Brits work longer hours than Europeans

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (26)

  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 311
    Iamcoldsteve said

    What a misleading title. Effectively leasing is cheaper than buying, and then goes on to to list a whole loads of cars that are cheaper to buy.....

    As there are no representative figures for monthly lease costs, how can a judgement be made?

    The comments are mileage don't make sense.

    "If you cover a lot of miles, then leasing can work out cheaper than buying a car. However, if you exceed a certain mileage (say, 10,000 miles a year), ...." - 10,000 / year is absolutely not a lot of miles, in fact it is below average.

    I wonder what Cliff has used as the comparison? List Price? who pays list price - very few people. I can't see this article as being very informative, as it could be boiled down to 'look at leasing a car, it may be cheaper' as it is very light on detail.

    Report on 07 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  6 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    Most people buy a second hand car because that is the cheapest. Buy a new car if you can afford the depreciation, a nearly new one the same or one getting on but in good condition if you can't afford to spend a lot. Most people are sensible and wouldn't consider buying new or leasing. My depreciation? £300 a year and if it lasts a couple more years even less... Find me a lease for £25 a month!

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • trekdigit
    Love rating 3
    trekdigit said

    If it were cheaper to lease than to buy, lease companies wouldn't make any money!

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • samanthadaviesuk
    Love rating 3
    samanthadaviesuk said

    A two year old car is a good buy. A lot of the initial depreciation has been already taken out of the price.

    With the reliability of cars these days, you can keep it for 5-7 years and not have any significant expenditure apart from normalt running costs (Tax, Insurance, Tyres and Servicing) then sell it for a couple of grand and repeat the whole thing again.

    All you have to do is put the equivalent cost of a lease away each month in say, a cash ISA!!!

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ains
    Love rating 4
    ains said

    Odd title the evidence presented contradicts it, buying can be cheaper than leasing if you hold onto a car for longer, negotiate hard on the purchase price and get a service plan There is usually an upfront cost with leasing which evens out the depreciation of purchase, however with no major capital layout, leasing gives you better cash-flow and even if it is not cheaper than buying and takes the risk out which is why PCPs are popular ways of buying cars and changing them every 3-4 years. The article should really be expanded to show more of the overall cost factors.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 113
    Aitken B said

    You should also be aware that cars are graded by the manufacturer. Grade 1 go for export, grade 2 for domestic sales and grade 3 for fleet. If you lease a car you will get a grade 3 car.

    No guarantee of trouble of course but it does make it more likely.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • gez
    Love rating 8
    gez said

    Sorry, I think the last post by AitkenB is rubbish. The majority of cars are made to order and the manufacturers have a 'just in time' method of keeping stock controlled so I very much doubt that they duplicate each part with three grades of quality!

    If you have inside information or proof it would be very interesting to see it.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • joannakd
    Love rating 9
    joannakd said

    This article is so misleading.

    I bought a new car last year on a financial loan (very cheap <3%).

    Anyway, I pay £398 per month for the loan.

    The dealer (Audi) wanted me to get to PPP/Leasing and pay, oh a bit less at about £350.

    What you forgot to mention is having a car past the contract period (say, 3 years).

    Leasing - After 3 years you pay a little less per month and minimal (if any) deposit and if you stop paying you have no car (difficult if you need to get to work) and no financial value.

    Purchase - After 3 years you pay a little more per month and a deposit, but you still have a car (an asset) which has a value.

    D'Arcy not doing his homework (again). Are you being funded by Arriva or ALD or another car leasing company ?

    PS It was cheaper to buy a new car with a heavily negotiated discount than a nearly new car where the depreciation hadn't dropped that much.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • qwertyu
    Love rating 9
    qwertyu said

    Misleading title. This is compared to buying with a loan. If you have the money and unless you can beat the 8.9% with savings account then still much cheaper to buy without a loan. I thought the title sounded odd. This website was originally part of the Foolish lot so I presumed you'd not consider foolishly loaning money to buy a depreciating asset.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • qwertyu
    Love rating 9
    qwertyu said

    and if you don't have the money save up for it. Buy something that is within your means.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • finnol49
    Love rating 22
    finnol49 said

    Buy the car when it has lost the VAT & the special car tax. Pay cash.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    Does this article take into account that many people will already have a car that they can use as a deposit for the next purchase?

    Does a leasing company take the owner's existing car into account when working out the lease period and amount.

    Leasing may be an option for those who need a vehicle for business use, but for personal use, it might be better to buy (new or secondhand). For many, they still need the ability to trade in one vehicle for another, so leasing may prove more costly, even if the monthly figures are lower, because the loss of the previous asset (We Buy Any Car offer way below that offered by dealers when part exchanging).

    I would have also liked to have seen figures representative for each vehicle, showing the cost of ownership over a two year period compared to the cost of leasing the vehicle over the same period, using real figures from actual providers.

    There are also various levels of leasing, from the basic renting of a car, leaving the responsibility of servicing and replacing consumables, such as tyres, to the leaser, to the full on package where servicing and tyre costs are covered by the monthly cost.

    This article does need some serious expansion, so as to make a more informed comparison.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • dilbert999
    Love rating 8
    dilbert999 said

    trekdigit:

    I believe that lease companies can reclaim the VAT on cars, so they start off with a 16.67% tax advantage

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    I DO have inside information and AitkenB is talking rubbish about graded vehicles. There sometimes are reworked or repaired vehicles which are sold to dealerships for demos or leased to staff at discounted rates, but the suggestion that different qualities of vehicles are regularly sorted for 'export' etc. is total nonsense. It used to be the case, certainly in the old Austin Rover days, that vehicles with slight faults were sold to dealerships as 'B' grade so that the dealers could then sort out residual issues under warranty (I bought a Maestro van which had all the suspension arms replaced at first service) - but I can attest to the manufacturers obsession with better and better quality production these days and the whole aim is zero faults and right first time.

    As regards the generality of the article, I think there are too many 'apples and oranges' comparisons and if we are to take these kind of things seriously I now expect an article outlining the advantages of remaining single and using the services of ladies of ill-repute as being more cost effective than marriage.

    Report on 08 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rbgos
    Love rating 81
    rbgos said

    I loathe depreciation, so my two cars are:

    - A classic Lotus, which will (if well cared for) probably increase in value;

    - An elderly Zafira, which cannot depreciate more than £800 in all the time I own it, 'cos that's all I paid for it on eBay.

    Of course, with both of these, it helps hugely that I can maintain and fix them myself...

    Report on 09 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • GarethK
    Love rating 0
    GarethK said

    Some people really are precious about the idea of owning a car!

    I had a car, bought 2 years old and cost me £6,000 and my 5 year loan cost around £140 a month to pay for the car. I then had to pay tax, insurance, MOT and servicing after the first year, new tyres, repairs and all the other stuff you have to pay for yourself once the warranty has expired plus lots of faffing around with number plates. On the car's fifth birthday one of the pistons shot through the engine block and it was a mechanical write-off, giving me £550. But I was still paying £140 for a further 2 years. When you buy through a loan, as the vast majority of people do, you're paying the same each month for a product that's worth less and less.

    Since the car blew up I've lived in London where a car is way more hassle than it's ever worth, and I've rented whenever I've needed a car (on average is 4-5 times a year). When renting I've spent around £150 per week doing so but that includes everything except petrol. You can get some monthly rental deals for well under £200 and the key is that the product you're using is still worth the same because after a period you get a new vehicle.

    Not only is the overall cost much lower but there's virtually no hassle. To top it off I get to drive virtually new cars and sample lots of different models everytime I drive. Looking back car ownership was a massive pain in the backside and I never want to go back to that again!

    The way I see it, if you're going to be needing a car to drive a few miles to work and back everyday then get an old but low maintenance car. If you need to be using your car for show (eg you use your car for work purposes) then lease. If you're going to be using a car occasionally then rent.

    Report on 09 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Charliebob2000
    Love rating 3
    Charliebob2000 said

    Wouldn't any lease company have factored in the depreciation value somewhere? If nothing else the lease company can presumably claim depreciation as a tax loss.

    I expect the financial advantages (where there are any) come from fleet buying at discount, insurance and maintenance commissions, and all the little charges made when the car is returned. None of which are available to most of us.

    Lease hire certainly seems to be a relatively trouble free option, but to save any money I think you would have to look very carefully.

    CB

    Report on 09 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 311
    Iamcoldsteve said

    Example.

    I have owned my Vectra for 6 years. It was one year old at purchase and now has covered 180,000 miles. It is my daily drive.

    It has cost me next to nothing to repair - the only things to have failed (that have cost anything significant) are the 2 front road springs, and these cost about £30 each to buy.

    In fact, I have a spreadsheet that details all the costs of this car, including purchasing, road tax, MOT, servicing, insurance, repairs, etc etc and it comes to a total of just over £11,000.

    It cost me £8000, and it now probably worth less than £500.So that works out at about £100 per month. How much would it have cost me to lease? A 1.8 Insignia (Vectra replacement) would cost around £260 per month for 3 years with an initial payment of around £1000. So (using these numbers) over 6 years would have cost nearly £20,000.

    I think I will stick to my car purchasing model of buying nearly new cars and running them until they are dead.

    Furthermore, I fitted a certified towbar for less than £25 - compared to the cost by the lease company of over £500. I can also add things to my car if I wanted to - eg parking sensors (less than £20 off Ebay - Lease car cost = £400.) Adding a rear power socket to mine would have cost about £10. Lease car cost = £85. A Bluetooth adaptor for phone to stereo would have cost about £50, lease car cost = £220.

    You just cannot add things to a lease car yourself - you have to get (usually) the main dealer to do it.

    A mate of mine has a company leased car, and he wanted a towbar added. It cost about £600 at the dealer - even though he knew he could get the exact same towbar fitted for less than half if he had been allowed to go somewhere else.

    There you go, some ACTUAL numbers in order to make a realistic comparison.

    Report on 09 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • RMN05
    Love rating 11
    RMN05 said

    It's funny how we end up being the antithesis of our parents. My father was a motor metal fanatic, new car every year. Me - a car is simply a box on 4 wheels that gets you from A to B, and I follow the religion of GarethK. Buy a good second hand car and keep it as long as poss. I currently enjoy the comfort and gizmos of a diesel Rover 75 for long journeys and hols. Bought it at 2 years old with 3 years free servicing, now had it for over 6 years and will probably keep it for at least another 2 years. (Also have a 10 year old Ka for piddling around on short journeys, bought 3 years ago from daughter who'd had it for 6 years, by giving her slightly more than she had been offered for part exchange, so reliable history. Still only done 45K, so will owe me nothing). I won't pander to media exhortations to buy into newest, shiniest metal in the road.

    Report on 09 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • oldhenry
    Love rating 265
    oldhenry said

    I think many find the 'little' charges at the end of a lease add up quite a lot. Every blemish is made out into a full respray with much teeth sucking. I dealt with operating lease finance at work beofre retirement and the handing back of commercial vehicles was a drawn out job with lots of arguments. Would the typical private ownwer be in a position to deal with this aggro? Our Transport manager was of course.

    But we had to lease to avoid local government spending capital controls so we were forced into a corner by the stupidity of central government thinking it knows best.

    Report on 09 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • krustallos
    Love rating 39
    krustallos said

    I've always bought second hand cars at least 2 years old and it's worked for me. These days though I'm using the car so little I'm thinking of selling it and joining a car sharing scheme - £50 annual subscription (which includes fully comp insurance) and £5 an hour/ £50 a day to actually use a car.

    Report on 09 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 311
    Iamcoldsteve said

    This article is now on Yahoo News, and is being slated for it's inaccuracies, misleading title and also for being plain wrong.

    Report on 09 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Tibsie
    Love rating 1
    Tibsie said

    So the biggest cost of owning a car is owning a car??!! Thanks for stating the obvious.

    Depreciation is simply an accounting trick to spread the difference between purchasing an asset and selling it after using it over the period of time it was used. It's not a "real" cost, only a "psychological" one. You don't see cash disappearing from your bank account every year that you own the car as it decreases in value (well...) It's a spreadsheet and mental exercise to get over the fact that you just spent many thousands of pounds on a single item.

    There is an alternative. Buy a car and run it into the ground. You get maximum value for money as you are spreading the initial cost over the longest period of time possible. Only sell the car once it has become uneconomic to keep repairing it.

    This is what I'm doing with my car. I've had it for 4 years so far and according to "the website with the annoying tv advert that will buy any car" it is still worth nearly 50% of what I paid for it and I've only needed a full set of new tyres and a new silencer so far. I fully expect to get another 4-6 years use out of it.

    Report on 12 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • rightoncommander
    Love rating 14
    rightoncommander said

    Tibsie, depreciation is not an accounting "trick", even in the accountancy environment. It is a useful way to spread the upfront cost of an asset over the period in which it will be used. The alternative is to count investments as the same as expenses, which of course they fundamentally are not. Investors need to be able to distinguish companies that are losing money from those that are using money, by building factories for example.

    However, in the case of cars it is even more real than that. Depreciation shows the difference between what you actually paid for it and what you could actually sell it for.

    The sensible option is to let some other idiot pay for the privilege of driving off the dealer's forecourt by buying a nearly-new car. Which is exactly what Cliff says he does. So what was the point of the article?

    Report on 12 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • neil733
    Love rating 1
    neil733 said

    Buying nearly-new is not risk-free.

    Why is a nearly-new car for sale? Is it because it was a short-term rental vehicle previously, driven mostly by people who didn't care about whether or not they abused it?

    Was it a troublesome vehicle the first owner has taken a loss on to buy something more reliable? If you can't rule either of these two out, then you could be buying a troublesome vehicle. It may have most of its warranty left, but if its always in the garage for warranty work it is of little use to you.

    I have in the past bought brand new (built to order) two cars that according to friends and colleagues who bought similar cars nearly new were likely to be troublesome, but both proved almost faultless for the first five years (perfectly faultless in the case of the 1997 Rover 200). Why? My cars had been built and shipped straight to the dealer and delivered to me - they hadn't been sitting around for weeks or months deteriorating from lack of use waiting for a buyer, or been abused by rental-car drivers. Yes, I did suffer the depreciation, but it was worth it for the lack of problems.

    Report on 12 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jaymie
    Love rating 18
    jaymie said

    Renting a car is cheaper - except for 75% of the table I've quoted from Which?. Odd.

    Anyway, I like the idea of leasing, but in an uncertain economic environment it makes far more sense to hang onto the car I've got. Should the worst (in employment terms) happen, I can sell that for a couple of thousand pounds and not have to worry about meeting my leasing commitments for the remainder of the term for a car which wouldn't be essential. Who wants that over their head right now?

    Report on 12 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Virgin Money Credit Card MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.99% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4