Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Car insurance

Car insurance: putting telematics to the test

ReenaSewraz
by Lovemoney Staff ReenaSewraz on 22 June 2012  |  Comments 11 comments

Telematics technology promises to cut the cost of car insurance for good drivers. We decided to test that claim.

Car insurance: putting telematics to the test

Telematics systems that track driving habits can lower car insurance premiums for safe drivers and have been available since 2008.

Yet this concept has failed to set the insurance world alight. Trading privacy for perks seems to have held people back and stalled a revolution in the sector. But with the claims culture forcing premiums to rise and the EU ruling on gender soon to come into force, could this be the most precise and fair way to lower the cost of car insurance for everyone?

As a young driver who has experienced the horror of massive insurance premiums, I decided to test out the technology for myself to see if my actual individual driving habits could improve the cost of my car insurance.

Autosaint

I generally think I am a good driver so I was happy to take on the challenge from Autosaint to drive around with a telematics tracker in my car for ten days.

Autosaint is a niche insurer which offers provisional, newly-qualified and young drivers low premiums, in return for responsible driving through the use of in-vehicle telematics technology.

Interestingly, Autosaint offer a low premium to this risky age group from the outset, so it is up to the driver to live up to that trust or risk a rise in premium determined at a quarterly review.

Irresponsible driving alters the premium, but alerts and suggestions on how to improve driving are in place through an online dashboard, as well as email/text alerts to avoid that happening.

Autosaint builds a risk profile through a scoring system. Drivers are scored out of 100 and if a number of bad driving incidents occur (categorised into speeding, harsh braking and harsh accelerating) points are deducted.

If a driver scores below 60, the premium will be adjusted in the quarterly review, but those scoring 60 and above will continue to benefit from the cheapest premium offered at the start of the policy and at renewal are offered even larger discounts.

My results

Using my online dashboard, I can see I drove 220 miles on the ten days I was being monitored, consisting of around ten journeys ranging from three to 52 miles.

My overall score for the journeys I had completed was 99 which is a score that is deemed ‘EXCELLENT’.

The report that came through in my email told me: "Driving this well means not only that you are driving safely but we won’t need to increase your insurance premium at your next quarterly review."

Great news! Because I drove safely for a great proportion of the time if I had a policy with Autosaint I could expect my premium to remain low at the next evaluation.

But what was I doing wrong 1% of the time?

Where I went wrong

Although my score looks as if my driving was near perfect, the little black box did record some bad driving in a number of incidents. In total I had 12 ‘Events’ which the Autosaint Dashboard flags as something to work on and offered advice to help improve my driving habits.

Of the 12 incidents, six were harsh braking events, two harsh acceleration events and four were speeding events.

Did I deserve a lower score?

It is clear from the fact that 12 incidents were recorded against my driving that I am in no way a perfect driver.

I am sure there were a few cases that were just plain bad driving on my part as many of the journeys I did were familiar routes, but having this technology has made me really think about these incidents and why they may have occurred. Generally, I found that my preoccupation with driving carefully (as I knew I was being tested) was thwarted by the behaviour of other road users.

The fact I tested the technology for a week probably explains my score. Given three months I am sure the score would have come down to account for speeding incidents and the harsh braking, but not so low that it would be under 60 and thus affect any premium offered by Autosaint.

Potential game changer

My car is a 2003 Vauxhall Corsa Sxi three door hatchback. Using the example of a 24-year-old driver, with a full licence and one month's experience, car insurance premiums from other insurers could be as high as £4,317 for a year's comprehensive cover (from Fresh). However, with Autosaint, that premium drops all the way down to £2,488, a saving of almost £2,000, thanks to the telematics box.

Obviously, Autosaint is not going to be an option for many of us as they only deal with very new drivers. But similar technology is employed by a number of other insurers (the Cooperative, the AA, Insurethebox, I-kube) for drivers of all ages. So the potential benefits of telematics are open to all, if we are willing to take the plunge.

Is it the future?

I think if more people used telematics it would bring unprecedented transparency to car insurance rates, benefiting good drivers and forcing bad drivers into making changes.

Of course with this particular system from Autosaint, there are only three determining factors deciding whether you are a good driver; speeding, braking and accelerating. Many would argue that the true measure of a good driver involves far more information than a tracking system can provide and I would agree. However, for now, the system is useful for pinpointing any existing bad habits and suggesting steps to improve which may be invaluable for a less experienced driver.

The obvious downsides to these sorts of policies is that some don’t allow you to drive at night (as this is when a lot of accidents occur), the low mileage limits are not beneficial to a driver that needs to travel great distances for work or college and of course the privacy issues.

Would you consider this technology to help lower your car insurance premiums? Or is this Big Brother monitoring gone mad? Share your thoughts in the comment boxes below.

More on car insurance:

25 ways to cut your car insurance

Car insurance: female drivers are being cheated!

Car insurance: why we're complaining more

AA Drivesafe: The little black box that will cut your car insurance bill

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (11)

  • Poorpensioner
    Love rating 36
    Poorpensioner said

    Insurance should be risk-based.

    Young males are riskier than young females, therefore there should be a suitable difference in premium.

    What business is it of the EU to interfere in risk-based assessment in this way?

    Is sexism different from ageism or experienceism?

    The sooner we do away with this interfering unelected body, the better.

    Report on 22 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    I was involved in the vehicle security industry for years and telematics have been around a very long time in fleet circles, they just migrated into private vehicles with growing popularity for young drivers. I don't agree with some of the broad and rather stupid assumptions insurers are making regarding driving styles. What constitutes 'harsh' acceleration and braking? I used to have a Supra Turbo which because of my age I could insure for peanuts - damn right I'd use the acceleration and braking capabilities, but that had no bearing on safety. I never speed around town but 80mph on motorways is pretty average.

    My ex wife drives like a saint, she passed her advanced test and bumbles along but every car she has ever driven ends up with seized rear brakes because she never brakes hard enough for the balancer valve to actuate the rear brakes. In an emergency I don't think I'd trust her car to stop straight between services, whereas I check all the systems on mine every day.

    My 18 year old son was insured with I-Kube but did 20,000 miles in a year and now they won't insure him. I'd say that now he has that mileage under his belt with no accidents he should get a cheaper rate, not be penalised. Having personally experienced the corruption and partiality of insurance companies in the past where they would approve some products but not others of an appreciably higher standard, I don't trust their logic or reasons one bit. The whole industry stinks and it is about time that proper risk analysis went into their premiums. I am particularly annoyed that the government cannot work out some kind of commuter insurance policy linked to telematics which will enable youngsters to get to work.

    One of my recent experiences of how stupid insurance companies are was Saga wanting over £100 more to insure a 1.3 Kia Rio than a 2.0 Chrysler Neon. Swiftcover amazed me by giving a renewal premium £20 cheaper than last year, now almost £150 less than Saga would want (I still have another vehicle insured with Saga, there is just NO logic to their pricing).

    Report on 22 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • oldhenry
    Love rating 265
    oldhenry said

    I cannot see any 'magic' solutons in this product. Insurance companies will get their profit from users by any means they can. It is capitalism and when they have a cartel you are stuffed. I am sure there is a lot of fraud in insurance , it is staffed by amateurs and open to abuse in such a 'free' country as the UK.

    So many other prasites live off the back of motorists ( the biggest being the governmnet) that they , sorry we, will pay ever more each year until it is so expensive we really do give it up. That will be a way off yet and teh parasites will move onto the next host- just like a louse does when a dog dies.

    Report on 22 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    Everything risk based? OK fine. No employers who spend a lot of money training staff and are vulnerable to staff absence would risk employing any young women. Holiday insurance for both sexes between ages of 18 and 25 should rocket. How can equality be sexism? I see more and more young female drivers acting like idiots and I'm sure they're actively working on the fairness issue of their insurance.

    @Poorpensioner

    Even your nickname makes it obvious that you're going to wallow in self-pity and moan about Europe. Being in Europe means one lot of product regulations and Europe-wide insurance. I can drive my car anywhere in Europe (if I wanted to) and know that I have basic insurance cover, but more to the point I can import products into the UK and send them anywhere in Europe hassle free. I bet when we get edicts that pensions must be increased there will be old moaners like you first in the queue to say that the UK must conform. Whatever suits you, I'm sure. Why are you a poor pensioner? What did former my father in law who is now 92 and came to the UK from Poland after the war do differently to the likes of you? He worked hard and saved, still drives, owns his bungalow and can afford anything he needs. He's also thankful for everything this country did for him but, like a lot of Poles, he did a hell of a lot for us too.

    Report on 22 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    So, if I used this telematic system my premiums would start low, and gradually increase, due to my erratic driving style, even though I have had no 'at fault' accidents in something like 30 years of driving (the one accident I was involved in was the other drivers fault for failing to 'give way' at a junction).

    So, why would my telematics be high? Well, I live in the country (the Fens), and our roads are potted to buggery, therefore there is plenty of swerving to miss the ruts.

    Also, farm traffic at set times of the year is quite prevalent. Overtaking slow moving tractors is a must, unless you want to cruise down the A16 or A17 at 10 to 15 mph for the entire length, therefore acceleration, deceleration and harsh manoeuvring is the norm.

    Also, there are quite a few poor junctions, such as the one at Gosberton/Belchmire Lane where you have to take into account three streams of traffic instead of the usual two.

    So, telematics won't show that you swerve to avoid the idiot that has just pulled out on you while negotiating the roundabout at Spalding (your right of way), or the sudden acceleration as you swoop around the tractor that has been pottering along at 10mph for the last five minutes (they don't pull over, and they don't pay fuel duty either, so what are they doing on the public highway for such long periods of time?).

    So, I think I'd rather stick to showing my insurer that I am a safe driver simply by demonstrating that I don't have accidents, or don't cause accidents.

    Report on 23 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • wondrinfree
    Love rating 12
    wondrinfree said

    It maybe the uptake is slow because most people have not heard of the scheme rather than fears of lack of privacy. You've been framed has effectively demonstrated how few qualms people have being recorded if there is money involved.

    I think the scheme is an excellent idea for many reasons. Many young drivers are prohibited (by cost) from driving because they haven't got the necessary experience on the roads. Which begs the question how are they ever going to get it? This method makes driving accessible to them but keeps them on a very short leash with very clear incentives for good driving, regular appraisal periods and plenty of helpful feedback. Best of all it gives them a score - which for most people is incentive enough. It highlights weaker areas that the driver may not be aware of and will help foster good practices and build good habits. It may also help reduce the number of uninsured drivers on the road who are currently excluded from driving with insurance through prohibitive costs.

    Another great thing about this scheme is that is measured the risk of the individual not the stereotype.

    Report on 23 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • RocketSteve
    Love rating 30
    RocketSteve said

    I guess it didn't track the times you failed to indicate properly or for other drivers consideration. Pulling over into the next lane without seeing that car in your blindspot. Turning your grey car's lights on when is was pouring with rain and that car disappears into the spray. Failing to turn your lights on at night. Cutting up someone on a roundabout because lane discipline is atrocious.

    Of course not, because it's speed that kills... (What green-cross code!)

    Report on 24 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • JRAY100
    Love rating 50
    JRAY100 said

    English:

    noun: licenCe, practiCe;

    Verb: licenSe, practiSe.

    Report on 26 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • eLJay
    Love rating 76
    eLJay said

    JRAY - thanks for that as I am just as bad. Noun is a thing and Verb a doing word? It's been a quarter of a century since I decided not to do an English A-Level so I am starting to get very rusty!

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Buzz80
    Love rating 0
    Buzz80 said

    Seems a very flawed system to me, any system that marks down on acceleration and deceleration is not taking standard road use into account, so a child runs out in front of you, do you a: brake hard and avoid the child (thus causing a black mark) or b: keep going and hit the child! I think i know what i would do, but should i get a mark for this?

    Many other similar things, when driving you have to take into account everything around you, and if other brake hard you have to also brake hard! This is really not an innovative thing at all, it is just a gimmick that reallyl wont help the situation!

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rpb
    Love rating 26
    rpb said

    @Buzz80: I don't know how the marking scheme works, but I would presume that it doesn't raise your premiums for the odd hard-braking moment (as, indeed, the author of the article indicated because she was at a score of 99 and had some hard-braking "events"). Obviously you will (very) occasionally have to ram on the brakes if someone else does something really stupid. But if you are a safe driver aware of things around you, this should be a rarity.

    However, marking down and charging more for those idiots who screech up to junctions, ram on their brakes and then screech away again - fine by me! Just because one has a "Supra Turbo" or whatever doesn't make it safe, considerate or even ecological to floor the accelerator one minute and ram on the brakes the next in the normal course of driving.

    Report on 28 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3