Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Car insurance

Your rights if you're hit by an uninsured driver

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 07 June 2012  |  Comments 16 comments

There are two million uninsured vehicles on the roads in the UK. If you're in an accident with one of them, where do you stand?

Your rights if you're hit by an uninsured driver

British drivers can choose between three levels of car insurance:

Third-party cover: in the event of an accident, this protects third parties (drivers, pedestrians and other members of the public) if you injure them or damage their property. It provides no cover for your car.

Third party, fire and theft (TPFT) cover: This extends third-party cover to include theft of your car and fire damage caused to it by vandalism or mechanical failure.

Fully comprehensive cover: The highest level of cover, this extends TPFT to include damage to your own car in an accident, even if you are to blame.

Under British law, third-party cover is the bare minimum level of car insurance required to drive in the UK. If you drive a car without any insurance or a SORN (Statutory Off Road Notification), then you are breaking the law. Nevertheless, with two million uninsured drivers roaming the UK's roads, increasing numbers of accidents involve these law-breakers.

Cracking down on uninsured vehicles

Driving without insurance carries a maximum fine of £5,000 and six to eight penalty points added to the offender's licence. Courts can also order the immediate disqualification of offenders.

Driving without insurance can be punished by the issue of a £200 fixed-penalty notice and six penalty points. The police have wide powers to stop vehicles and inspect insurance certificates, with 300,000 convictions for uninsured driving being handed out each year.

The police can also seize, dispose of and even destroy uninsured vehicles. Indeed, police officers confiscate around 1,500 uninsured vehicles each week. In addition, the Road Safety Act 2006 provides harsher sentences for those who kill or are involved in accidents while driving uninsured.

For the record, uninsured drivers are roughly 10 times more likely to have been convicted of drink-driving, five times more likely to have been involved in road traffic accidents, frequently drive carelessly or recklessly, and are more likely to have committed other criminal offences.

So what are your rights when you're involved in an accident with an uninsured driver? How do you go about getting your money back?

Was it your fault?

If an accident was entirely your fault (for instance, you hit another car from behind), then you can't seek reimbursement from the other driver, regardless of whether they have insurance or not.

If you have 'fully comp' insurance, then you should claim against this policy for repairs. Unfortunately, this will mean paying an excess (often £100 or more) and, possibly, losing your no-claims discount. If you make an 'at fault' claim and lose your no-claims discount, then your next renewal premium could leap dramatically and stay higher for at least three more years.

Since 2004, Direct Line has operated an 'uninsured driver promise' for fully comprehensive policyholders. If you make a claim for an accident that is not your fault and the other vehicle is uninsured, then you won't lose your no-claims discount and Direct Line will refund your excess.

Last week, the AA -- the UK's biggest insurance broker -- made a similar promise. Any driver insured through the AA involved in an accident with an uninsured vehicle will no longer lose their excess and no-claims discount. 

The uninsured driver is to blame

In theory, at-fault uninsured drivers are personally responsible for all damages and personal injuries they cause. In practice, people driving without insurance have few or no assets to meet these financial liabilities. So the chance of successful recovering damages from an uninsured driver is nearly zero.

Where can you turn to reclaim uninsured damages?

The Motor Insurers' Bureau

The Motor Insurers' Bureau (MIB) has been operating since 1946 and is funded by the UK's motor insurers and -- by extension -- insured, law-abiding motorists.

If you're involved in accident with an uninsured vehicle and forced to claim on your own insurance, then the MIB will compensate your insurer for the costs of your claim. Once this compensation has been received, your insurer should reinstate your no-claims discount and cancel any corresponding premium increase.

The MIB pays out compensation to those who suffer personal injury or damage to their property as a result of accidents involving uninsured motor vehicles. In effect, this agreement between the government and the MIB ensures that innocent victims of uninsured drivers don't lose out financially.

Then again, when a driver is untraced, the MIB can pay compensation for property damage only where the vehicle concerned has been identified. So if both driver and vehicle are not identified (such as in 'hit and run' accidents), then the MIB won't pay out for property damage, but will pay out personal-injury claims.

Driving up premiums

According to the MIB, more than one in 25 drivers on British roads (4%) is uninsured.

These offenders place a huge financial burden on other motorists, estimated to be £380 million each year. As a result, they add £30 to the typical yearly premium for car insurance.

More on motoring:

Get quality quotes for car insurance

Carpooling: an easy way to cut your car costs

Britain's most unreliable cars

How to beat parking fines

Diesels are cheaper than petrol cars...for some of us

The most expensive petrol in the world

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (16)

  • dpoliver
    Love rating 1
    dpoliver said

    Excellent. The police are cutting back on numbers, knowing full well that there are 2 million uninsured drivers out there. We have it so backward in this country.

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • oldlowie
    Love rating 9
    oldlowie said

    Two million uninsured drivers on our roads and 300,000 convictions a year? That's a less than 1 in 6 chance of being caught. No wonder, given the outrageous cost of car insurance, that drivers will take a chance.

    If the police have access to MID and SORN data, why don't they set up a team to plough through this information and identify those uninsured vehicles and take them off the roads?

    Perhaps the team should be funded by the MIB, rather than just doling out money - it's called being proactive...

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 600
    Mike10613 said

    I think the MIB make up statistics to justify it's own existence and charges on insurance companies. I doubt if 4% of drivers are uninsured and most uninsured drivers come from certain areas, that are virtually no go areas for the police. Perhaps, it's time to admit we have ghettos in Britain and the violence we have seen in Britain comes from those cesspits of poverty and they can't afford to insure their cars either. Maybe they could arrange for a KFC and a Mc Donalds to be opened in each area, they can flip burgers and say 'have a nice day' to make a few quid.

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sludgeguts
    Love rating 56
    sludgeguts said

    How about anpr cameras in every forecourt? If your car is pinged as no tax / insurance, the cctv takes a pic of you & car, the police are alerted & the pump will not be initiated.

    As oldlowie says, the police could set up a team to plough through this info - maybe made up of older officers who would otherwise have to retire early or confined to desk duties.

    This same team could respond to these alerts. As anpr can read many, many plates per minute, the car is pinged as soon as it comes off the road, giving plod time to mobilise.

    As for direct line & AA offering the uninsured scenario as a sweetener, you really have to wonder just what the hell insurance companies do for their money. Doesn't this otherwise go against trades description? I'm sure that a court would have to agree that an insurer not offering a service would be in breach of the description "fully comprehensive".

    So, uninsured drivers have no assets? Fine, if I'm hit by one, let me rummage through their posessions & I'll sell everything they own on ebay. If they are on benefits, reduce them by £20 per week & pay this to me. If they own a house, force them to downsize & use the spare to pay their debt. If they rent, again, force them to get cheaper accommodation. The only way bad people will learn is if they are inconvenienced enough.

    Once again, the innocent, law abiding citizen gets screwed over simply because successive governments refuse to grow a pair and toughen up on criminals.

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • cologne2792
    Love rating 0
    cologne2792 said

    'Once this compensation has been received, your insurer should reinstate your no-claims discount and cancel any corresponding premium increase.'

    Even If the MIB works as it should we still have the untrustworthy element that is the Insurance Companies themselves - many of whom use practices & methods so dodgy that if used in any other business would probably be illegal.

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 125
    Aitken B said

    The driver at fault is not "theoretically" liable they are actually liable. Their insurance status is a private contract between the insured person and the company and has no bearing on their liability. But the article is correct in that proving liability is a country mile away from being reimbursed. Our "wonderful" legal system is seriously deficient in this regard.

    Always remember that Insurance Companies are businesses whose objective is to make money. If they offer "free" protection against cost of being hit by an uninsured driver then you can be sure they will have assessed the risk and it will stack in their favour and lets not forget that they themselves have been acting in a way that has exacerbated the spiraling insurance costs.

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Tigger01
    Love rating 3
    Tigger01 said

    The problem is with the law in this country, cost of insurance typically between £500 and £1500 per year, typical fine for uninsured driver is £100 to £200!! Not really a deterrent is it!

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • nickpike
    Love rating 277
    nickpike said

    I was hit by an uninsured driver in London. I was stationary in a queue and hit from behind. Because he would not respond to 3 letters from what I thought was an arm of the RAC who specialise (supposedly) in compensation, I did not receive compensation and had to pay the excess myself. Waste of time these systems. Another reason I won't drive in London. It's riddled with the corrupt, like a jungle.

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Pennydot
    Love rating 0
    Pennydot said

    I was in an accident with an uninsured driver - no licence - lied about his name - everything. Police found him - he got 60 days community service. I went through the MIB and it cost me £500 excess! Not always good to be honest is it?

    Report on 08 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • culluding-fool
    Love rating 52
    culluding-fool said

    Do the same rules apply to an uninsured cyclist hitting a car?

    Report on 09 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • exportlink88
    Love rating 24
    exportlink88 said

    Include 3rd party insurance in the road tax.

    Issue a petrol card with every road tax - without which it would not be possible to buy fuel.

    Make the vehicle owner responsible for whoever drives his car.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • dimercaprol
    Love rating 5
    dimercaprol said

    The whole theory about "no fault " claims is a scam run by insurance companies. I was hit from behind by another driver while I was standing in a traffic queue. Their insurance paid for about £1000 worth of damage to my car. Although it was a no fault claim for me, my premium went up by £200 the next year. They said it doesnt matter whose fault it is - if any claim has been made, my premium goes up. This is despite paying extra for no claims protection. The only protection here is a protection racket run by these companies whose CEOs earn millions. But all we can complain about is GPs earning "too much" when they are on £60,000.

    Report on 13 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • andrewjameshowar
    Love rating 25
    andrewjameshowar said

    All the car ownership and insurance data is in readily accessible databases - we know this because we see it used when we tax our cars. Numberplate recognition software is readily available and cheap - it has been so for years. So here we have (we are told), hundreds of thousands of criminals, easy to identify and neither the authorities nor the insurance companies seem that bothered about putting a stop to their little game. It's scandalous.

    Report on 14 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • andrewjameshowar
    Love rating 25
    andrewjameshowar said

    PS

    GPs do earn too much, nonetheless.

    Report on 14 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sk9
    Love rating 1
    sk9 said

    My son was a named driver on a vehicle and was driving the car along a busy, dual carriageway. A car with an uninsured driver drove across him at a traffic light controlled junction causing both cars to be written off. Thankfully no one was hurt in the accident.

    The other driver was clearly to blame and subsequently prosecuted . The car cost £1000 six months earlier, the insurance company valued it at £600, his excess was £350 and he received £250. The MIB has a min threshold of £350 so all he received was £250. He did nothing wrong but the system punished him for the actions on an uninsured driver with no license !.

    That's unfair.

    Report on 14 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • alichats
    Love rating 0
    alichats said

    I agree it is totally unfair! I was hit 3 weeks ago by a milk delivery vehicle (A great big Mercedes flat bed not the little electric one) Again luckily no one was hurt and the truck was undamaged. The accident was entirely his fault an I have 2 independent witnesses. Although the vehicle was insured apparently the driver was not listed on the policy so it is classed as uninsured. I now have to lose my excess and have been told my car is likely to be written off. I will get nothing like I paid for it and with the loss of £325 excess won't be able to afford another car. Shouldn't the guy's boss be held responsible as he let him/asked him to drive the vehicle in the course of his business?

    Report on 17 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels