Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » The economy

Obama understands how to cut a deficit, I think

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 07 September 2010  |  Comments 17 comments

Big spending cuts won't reduce the deficit.

I’ve said several times that I think George Osborne’s strategy of aggressive spending cuts is a mistake. But I haven’t written much about what is going in the US. That’s a mistake, hence today’s post.

Let’s start with a quick recap of the history. Early last year, Obama launched a $787 billion stimulus package that was designed to head off a depression after the financial crisis. The money was mainly spent on infrastructure projects and support for state governments that weren’t able to borrow in tough times.

Polling evidence suggests that a majority of Americans think that the stimulus hasn’t worked. I think there are two reasons people for this:

-          Unemployment has stayed high. It rose to 9.6% in August and many pundits think it could go over 10% next year

-          The Republicans and their friends in the media have worked very hard to spread the false message that the stimulus has done nothing except increase the deficit.

It’s my strong belief that the US economy would be in a worse mess without Obama’s package and that the deficit would be higher too. If you don’t believe me, check out this blog post by Paul Krugman in the New York Times and, in particular, the graph at the bottom.

It’s just a shame that the package is now running out of puff and that unemployment is set to rise. It looks like Obama understands that he should have gone for a bigger stimulus and is trying to correct his mistake to some extent. He’s proposing to set up an ‘infrastructure bank’ and spend $50 billion on improving road, rail and other infrastructure.

Why does that matter to us?

I only wish Obama felt able to do much more but I guess he’s constrained by political realities and what he can get through Congress. It’s important for all of us that he makes progress on this because a healthy US economy is very much in the interests of the UK. If the US is struggling, it’ll be harder for our exporters to make money there.

Even more importantly, I wish George Osborne would pay attention to what Obama is doing and switch strategy.

It’s frustrating that Obama hasn’t gone for a bigger stimulus. We don’t know whether his limited proposals are driven by a realistic acceptance of political reality or whether he genuinely believes that a larger stimulus would do more harm than good. My hunch is that it’s the former. Either way, he isn't pushing for an Osborne-style austerity package. He probably understands that would be a very dumb move.

More: This speech is well worth reading

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (17)

  • Ed Bowsher
    Love rating 76
    Ed Bowsher said

    Shikisha,

    Sorry for getting your gender wrong! I don't know why I assumed you were a woman.

    Savvychic said:

    I dunno how anyone knows what George Osbourne's cuts are, since the Strategic Spending Review isn't publlished until October.

    We don't know the details of where the axe is going to fall. But we know the axe is going to chop aggressively. Osborne has made that very plain. For example, he plans to reduce the deficit to zero by 2015.

    has anyone noticed they were getting more from their Council during Labour's reign?

    You're right, I haven't noticed any improvement in services from my council. But I have noticed improvements in the NHS. Still, I accept that some of the money Labour spent was wasted.

    Ed

    Report on 13 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • larryf
    Love rating 1
    larryf said

    As always the " man in the street" will bear the brunt of any cuts the government puts in place. The fat cats will, as always, line their pockets somehow. Reading the Sundays yesterday it was disgusting to see the pension pots that so many of these people are walking away with . I think that those high fliers in the banks that were rescued by our money should be held to blame and made to feel some pain in the form of pension pot reductions and salary decreases. At least until such time as they climb out of the self dug holes and pay back the mind blowing sums of money put up to save their corporate skins!

    Report on 13 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 22Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 22 months (2.9% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable). Refund offer reduces handling fee from 2.9% to equivalent 1.7% (Ts&Cs apply)

Virgin Money MasterCard

0% for 20 months (2.99% fee) Representative 16.8% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 16.8% APR (variable). Purchase rate 16.8% PA (variable).

Barclaycard Low Fee Platinum Visa

0% for 17 months (1.6% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse