Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » The economy

Scotland set to abolish 'slab tax'

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 08 June 2012  |  Comments 21 comments

The Scottish government is consulting on a plan to make stamp duty a fairer tax. Let's hope that the Westminster follows Holyrood's lead and abolishes the 'slab tax.'

Scotland set to abolish 'slab tax'

Stamp duty on property sales is possibly the most stupid tax in the UK. I don’t object to taxing a property sale, but I strongly object to the current ‘slab tax’ structure.

So if a residential property is sold for £249,000, stamp duty is charged at 1% on the whole value of the property. So you’d pay £2,490 in tax.

But if a property is sold for £251,000, stamp duty is charged at 3% on the whole value of the property. So you’d pay £7,530 in tax. This makes no sense at all.

Here are all the thresholds for this crazy tax:

Purchase price

Stamp duty rates

Up to £125,000

Zero

£125,001 to £250,000

1%

£250,001 to £500,000

3%

£500,001 to £1 million

4%

Over £1 million to £2 million

5%

Over £2 million

7%

It would make much more sense to structure stamp duty like income tax.

Say a house was sold for £400,000. Stamp duty could be levied like this:

£0 to £100,000: 0%

£100,001 to £200,000: 2%

£200,000+: 3%

In this example you’d end up paying £8000 in tax.

Scottish consultation

I’ve criticised the ‘slab tax’ before on lovemoney.com, so I’m delighted to see reports that the Scottish government is now consulting on plans to abolish stamp duty north of the border.

If the Scottish government follows through on its plans, stamp duty will be abolished in April 2015 and replaced by a fairer Land and Buildings Transactions Tax. Under the proposals, no tax will be charged on properties worth up to £170,000 and there will be tax cut for all properties sold for up to £325,000.

The Scottish government can make these changes as some extra tax-raising powers were devolved to Scotland this year. I just hope that the Chancellor has noticed this very sensible Scottish move.

End the slab tax now!

More:  Thousands owed inheritance tax rebate

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (21)

  • GodSenior
    Love rating 1
    GodSenior said

    They can abolish when they become independent I think.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • MK22
    Love rating 140
    MK22 said

    All step changes made sense when you did the calculations by hand with reference to a "book". These days it is all done by computers and there is no need for a step anywhere, just a straight line from 0 at the upper limit of the zero band through to the maximum at some much higher point. Simples.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rbgos
    Love rating 81
    rbgos said

    An excellent plan. I'm not a fan of Scottish Independence (or the SNP generally), but there are still one or two things happening in Scottish politics that the UK government would do well to take note of...

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • PDB11
    Love rating 72
    PDB11 said

    I agree that a progressive tax makes infintely more sense than a slab tax.

    How about subsuming it in a financial transaction tax, though?

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • jedi44
    Love rating 31
    jedi44 said

    @GodSenior

    Scotland do NOT need independence to abolish the current method of stamp duty. As of The Scotland Act (2012), passed in April, the Scottish Government has been given considerable extra tax raising/changing powers than previously, amongst several other things.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ownerjag
    Love rating 3
    ownerjag said

    Stamp Duty is not a tax on the sale of the property its a tax on the buyer of the property. Any property transaction tax should be moved on to the seller and that way first time buyers will never be charged it and the person paying it will often be paying it out of their profit. I hope the Scottish Government show Westminster how to be creative and fair.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • ronat42
    Love rating 62
    ronat42 said

    MK22. You may have some justification in your suggestion but anyone who couldn't do a simple progressive calculation on the same basis as income tax shouldn't be employed as a scarecrow let alone in the tax office. Then again, perhaps they were and then worked their way up to become Chancellor. :-)

    As far as the Scottish parliament is concerned I think it is more a question of borrowing money to make concessions and buy votes. Now where have I seen that done in the last 15 years?

    Nevertheless, I think that there is a lot of justification for this particular action.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • eLJay
    Love rating 76
    eLJay said

    Well good news for those squeezing rents out of the rest of the population but not really of much use to those on low wages unable to buy property! And I am a property owner.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • spajjer
    Love rating 5
    spajjer said

    The "slab tax" aspect is bad enough but is not the worst aspect of stamp duty on houses.

    Say I'm living in a £250,000 house in Reading but want to move to Milton Keynes to work so want to buy a £250,000 house there.

    Why should I be taxed £7,500 for doing this?

    I'm not making any money out of this. I just want to move to a job.

    It's not even as if I really own a £250,000 asset and therefore am "rich".

    I owe over £200,000 to the bank as a mortgage. I "own" less than £50,000 worth of my house.

    How is it fair to take 15% of my house away from me simply because I want to move?

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • sketharaman
    Love rating 7
    sketharaman said

    In India, the buyer of a propery pays stamp duty whereas seller pays capital gains tax (if any). While rates vary across different states, stamp duty follows a uniform structure in most places viz. telescopic / sliding scale. While we originally inherited most of our laws from the British Commonwealth Code, most comments to this post seem to suggest that we've fast tracked the process of making them more equitable.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • OorWullie
    Love rating 38
    OorWullie said

    I am a Scot but not a kilt-swinging one nor a staunch supporter of the SNP nor of independence but it does appear that the SNP is more aware of the public's mood and takes action to address it. Free nation-wide bus fares were introduced when previously this applied only within counties. It also introduced free prescriptions and free elderly care and free university education to Scottish residents (and not just to the Scots); indeed, many of the vacancies in residential homes for the elderly were occupied by those from south of the border.

    For the past 35 years there has been a constant influx by the English settling in the country (a take-over bid which few noticed). Bridge tolls were also abolished and the demonstrations at the Skye Bridge a few years ago were not organised by the locals but by the English settlers (sometimes referred to as the 'visitors') who were more entrepreneurial and introduced local businesses selling and advertising all that is Scottish.

    On a visit to the Isle of Skye a few years ago the local postman was English and he and his wife ran a croft and sold fresh locally grown produce; the bagpipe museum was setup and run by an Englishman; the local artist was English; the toy museum run by a family from Yorkshire; the local pottery by two English women; the best restaurant by an English couple; and this is only to mention a few. Anyone who believes that Scotland is populated only by the Scots would be deluding themselves.

    My one concern at Skye was when I had to use the public toilets only to discover a notice pinned on the wall outside saying, "These premises will be closed outside opening hours"! I gained the feeling that this sign had nothing to do with the English.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • ronat42
    Love rating 62
    ronat42 said

    OorWullie. Much as I admire your sentiments I must ask two questions.

    How are they paying for all of these freebies?

    What happens when the repayment is due?

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • oldhenry
    Love rating 265
    oldhenry said

    There should be a capital gains tax on house sales of all types. This would dampen the endless 'speculation' that surrounds the buying of houses in the UK . Houses ate to live in not to makes loads of money from, and if you do then pay tax as you would if you were doing the same in shares or other goods.

    Stamp duty was just another stealth tax introduced many years ago to swell the coffers of government that has a ceaseless appetite for out money .

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • holdswc
    Love rating 0
    holdswc said

    Ronat42 should bear in mind that the English subsidise Scotland, so, some might argue that we are paying for this potential freebe and the others already introduced. How about independence?

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • develyn
    Love rating 7
    develyn said

    Governments love stamp duty because it is so easy to collect. However these tables and thresholds are an anachronism. They belong more to the age of the quill pen than the computer. A straight percentage would be much simpler.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • bengilda
    Love rating 77
    bengilda said

    There are many unfair taxation "rules" and anomolies resulting from legislation.

    It is now over 40 years since the last effective property valuation was completed. If you are not on a water meter then that valuation figure is used to calculate your water bills. This can mean that virtually similar neighbouring houses are charged dramatically different sums fror the same service. And nobody wants to be bothered to sort it out.

    Report on 11 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Huboman
    Love rating 1
    Huboman said

    Ed, You would not think it so fine if you lived up here with that Meglomaniac Dictator Salmond running Scotland as most people up here have absolutely no idea that w.e.f. Apr 2015 he will be taking some 17 - 18% of everyones earnings whilst 10% will be going down South to the London Chancellor. He will need to take that just to balance the reduction in 'Block Grant' that is currently provided by HMG London!

    Beware, he is simply a Wolf in a suit just waiting to be crowned King of Scotland! I rest my case, unfortunately (and very sadly) Scotland will be a third world country in 5 - 10 years.

    Report on 12 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ronat42
    Love rating 62
    ronat42 said

    Huboman, and so say all of the true Scots that I have spoken to.

    Holdswc, I did bear that very much in mind.

    I think that Alex Salmond is from the same mould as 'His Royal Tonyness'

    Report on 13 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • RocketSteve
    Love rating 30
    RocketSteve said

    I guess we're lucky the stupid governments haven't lumped VAT on house buying AND a tax for selling them. Please keep it quiet!

    Chancellor said on TV the other day our (UK's) debt has lowered, so when will VAT drop back to 15%? Oh sorry, I forgot the voting public are so dumb that they don't know why it got to 17.% in the first place and will have forgotten about the extra 2.5% raise when the debt is at normal levels: so it wont drop...

    Report on 17 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tuttogallo
    Love rating 74
    tuttogallo said

    RocketSteve: sorry the debt is not down, only the rate at which it is rising. The "Fiscal deficit", that is the annual shortfall of income against expenditure has reduced.

    Our children and our children's children will still have to pay the interest on the interest on the interest on our mountain of debt.

    The present cuts go nothing like far enough to sort out the problem. What is needed is bigger cuts and an increase in taxes, which of course cannot be done because it's a vote loser.

    The finances of democracies, almost without exception, are ruined by these short term vote buying considerations.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • The Bank Manager
    Love rating 72
    The Bank Manager said

    Why there needs to be a variable tax is incomprehensible to me. First of all, for what service is this fee actually being paid?

    I believe that Stamp Duty was historically the registration of the exchange of ownership in the land at Land Registry, so it begs the question that for undertaking that paperwork and registering the new ownership details is pretty similar for a £125,000 transaction, as it would be for a £20,000,000 transaction.

    Placing a higher tax on this action, where the majority of UK property is now registered land and therefore the 'switch' from proprietor 'A' to proprietor 'B' is a simpler task than say 20-30 years ago when one had to go through the mass of deeds and covenants, should mean the costs are maintained at a level that should differ little.

    In addition, in a major town or city where a property is unknowingly priced at a stupid £X million, compared to a property in a rural area at say £200,000, the tax charges the buyer more and yet the parcel of land could be greater with the rural transaction! There is no parity here.

    It should be a flat fee to one and all, to ensure equilibrium. Stamp Duty is another stealth tax and successive Chancellors have done nothing about it because it brings much needed 'free' income into the Exchequer, guaranteed to be received, as it has to be paid at the time of the transaction. Very few can dodge this tax (I do not condone such an action)!

    Report on 24 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable)

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2