Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » The economy

Osborne's big mistake

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 25 January 2011  |  Comments 18 comments

The UK economy has gone into reverse. George Osborne's austerity budget was a big mistake.

Osborne's big mistake

The UK economy continues to shock. We learned today that the UK economy shrunk by 0.5% in the three months to December. That’s a shocking figure given that the economy grew by 0.7% during the previous three months.

If the economy continues to contract during the current quarter, we’ll be back in recession! (The official definition of a recession is when an economy contracts for two quarters running.)

Admittedly, the fall can partly be explained by the snow. But not completely. The Office of National Statistics says that even if the weather had been good, economic growth would still have been ‘flattish’. In other words, growth would have been around 0%. Economists had forecast a 0.5% rise for the quarter.

So what does this mean?

The Bank of England is now much more likely to print more money this year in another round of quantitative easing. Today’s news also means that a rise in the base rate is less likely. I said last week that I expected a rise in the base rate by May at the latest. Now I’m not so sure.

The Bank of England will be reluctant to push up interest rates if economic growth remains anaemic. On the other hand, if the Bank takes no action at all on inflation, we risk the nightmare scenario of stagflation – that’s where you get a recession and inflation at the same time. I don’t envy the Bank’s boffins and I’m really not sure what I’d do if I were in their shoes.

But there’s one thing I am sure about. George Osborne’s austerity programme is a big mistake. 2011 is going to be a year of tax rises and spending cuts and those measures are bound to slow the economy down. Yesterday, the Chancellor could argue that the economy was strong enough to withstand the pain of these cuts, but now that’s clearly not the case. A weak economy will generate less tax revenue for the government and make it harder for the government to cut the deficit.

The most effective way to reduce a deficit is to have strong economic growth. That’s what happened last summer when surprisingly high growth was followed by an unexpectedly large fall in the deficit. I fear the news will be much bleaker in summer 2011.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (18)

  • Mike10613
    Love rating 414
    Mike10613 said

    Don't worry, The Bank of England has a computer model that can predict what will happen to the economy. I have a brain and so can I; the rich will get richer, bankers will have bonuses, the traders in the city will sit pretty; the poor will get poorer and politicians will get even much stupid than they are now. 

    Report on 27 January 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ed Bowsher
    Love rating 76
    Ed Bowsher said

    Hello everyone,

    Thanks for the comments. It's great that we've had a (mostly) civilised debate.

    I'll now try and answer some of the points. I won't have time to respond to them all, I'm afraid.

    Hi Wally144,

    If you delve into the figures you will see that manufacturing - the engine which will pull us out of recession - grew at 0.9%.

    Yes, you're right, I should have mentioned the manufacturing growth number in my post. I'm pleased that we're getting some growth in that area and I'll be delighted if our economy does rebalance towards manufacturing over the next few years.

    However, I think we have to be realistic too. Services will always be a large part of our economy. And if we're not getting growth across the economy, tax revenue will fall and it will be harder to reduce the deficit.

    Paulypilot,

    This article completely ignores WHY the emergency budget occurred shortly after the General Election in 2010. It was because the Eurozone was going into meltdown at the time, and there was a very real risk of the contagion spreading to the UK too.

    Certainly Mervyn King thought that at the time and he seemingly persuaded Vince Cable too. But were we really at risk of meltdown? I'm not convinced.

    Let's not forget, the average maturity on the government's debt was 17 years in March 2010. Much longer than Greece, so there was no danger of default.

    Also, take a look at ten year gilt yields.

    http://www.fixedincomeinvestor.co.uk/x/bondchart.html?id=172&groupid=8&stash=AA86758

    The peak rate over the last two years was 4.4% in March 2010 when a Labour government or Lab/lib government was still possible. Nobody was panicking. Understandably because Alistair Darling had already announced some cuts in government spending.

    I'm not saying that the government should make no spending cuts at all. But it needs to be aware that if it cuts too much, economic growth can be anaemic or go into reverse and tax revenue falls. Then the deficit doesn't fall in spite of all the cuts. The impressive growth figures from last summer suggest that Alistair Darling was getting the balance right.

    You may think that I'm arrogant to say that I know better than the Governor of the Bank of England. But fact is, the Bank has been wrong in the past. Here are two examples: the then Governors supported our return to the gold standard in 1925, and our entry into the ERM in 1990. Both were big mistakes.

    Bengilda,

    Be quite honest and it is obvious that we have had a negative economy for several years now.

    Well, yes and no. The economy did grow. More goods and services really were sold. Houses really were built. But the growth wasn't sustainable. The party has ended and we're all paying the price. Recovering from a financial crisis as serious as 2008's was always going to be painful and difficult, regardless of the government's economic policy.

    I just think that the government is making the situation even worse by pursuing a sub-optimal policy. Lower growth means lower taxes and that makes it harder to reduce the deficit.

    Even Michael Portillo, a former Tory Chief Secretary to the Treasury, agrees with this view!

    http://www.citywire.co.uk/money/michael-portillo-why-spending-cuts-wont-crush-the-deficit-or-the-coalition/a441475

    Money quote from Portillo in the above article:

    "I think it's going to be very tough doing as much of it on public spending restraint as they think they are going to do...the way the deficit is going to be rid of is through economic growth."

    I'll finish up by agreeing with one of Wally's latter points.

    He [Brown] kept a large chunk of capital spending on schools and hospitals off the balance sheet. This was his PFI programme. What he hid from the public was the very onerous terms for this. In most cases it is costing 8x what the programme cost over the term of the programme, in payments to the companies who constructed the buildings.

    Yes, PFI has been an appalling disaster. In my view, it's the worst thing that Gordon Brown did. By miles.

    Have a nice evening!

    Ed

    Report on 27 January 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 22Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 22 months (2.9% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable). Refund offer reduces handling fee from 2.9% to equivalent 1.7% (Ts&Cs apply)

Virgin Money MasterCard

0% for 20 months (2.99% fee) Representative 16.8% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 16.8% APR (variable). Purchase rate 16.8% PA (variable).

Barclaycard Low Fee Platinum Visa

0% for 17 months (1.6% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels