Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » The economy

Why energy firms are hiking prices

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 26 November 2010  |  Comments 2 comments

Energy companies have boosted their profit margins massively in the last couple of months. Here's one reason why.

Energy companies are having a great time at the moment. Cold weather will boost consumption and the regulator said today that the companies have increased their profit margins by 38% in the last two months.

That’s a shocking rise and many pundits have already had their say. There was one comment in particular that caught my eye. It came from the well-known TV star, Martin Lewis.

He said:

“We shouldn’t get annoyed with energy companies for putting up prices up. They’re just doing their job – which is  NOT to keep us warm, but to make money for their shareholders. After all, that’s who we sold them to when they were privatised.

“The people we should get angry with regulators and politicians; they are the ones with the responsibility for ensuring a good supply of energy at a fair price.”

There’s something in that. Regulators and politicians deserve criticism and I’ll make some of my own in a minute. But unlike Mr Lewis, I’m not going to let the energy suppliers off the hook. In a properly functioning free market, suppliers shouldn’t be able to jack up margins at such speed. That makes me suspect that the suppliers have colluded. In other words, there may have been quiet ‘nods and winks’ between suppliers about price rises.

If that has actually happened, the suppliers have broken the law. I hope Ofgem aggressively examine the evidence on this. They mustn’t be fobbed off with fluent excuses from highly-paid lawyers.

But as I said, I do think that regulators and politicians have made mistakes too. The one that annoys me most was in the 90s.

When the electricity industry was privatised, the government sensibly split the industry into generators and suppliers. So most electricity was generated by two big suppliers, National Power and PowerGen, who sold their electricity to suppliers such as Southern Electricity.  The suppliers then sold electricity to households.

This structure delivered more transparency and more competition. More competition meant collusion was less likely and more transparency meant it was easier for the regulator to see if consumers were being ripped off.

Foolishly, the regulators allowed the generators and suppliers to merge in the 90s, and I think that’s one reason why the energy industry has been able to jack up margins and rip off consumers in recent times.

Compare energy tariffs at lovemoney.com

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (2)

  • MK22
    Love rating 91
    MK22 said

    I agree with Martin Lewis. Having made the mistake of privatising the utilities, it is the Government's responsibility to control them, not to compound the mistake by allowing the utilities to charge what they like. PS although Swalec have put their prices up as we all know, U-Switch still make them the cheapest green energy supplier. Interesting......

    Report on 02 December 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sadolegit
    Love rating 1
    sadolegit said

    Sorry, MK and Martin Lewis, but that line is too facile. On that basis, energy companies could increase their profit margins by, say 200% and you wouldn't bat an eyelid. You still seem to be locked in to prayer at the altar of the great god monetarism - long since discredited, I would have thought. I accept the basic principle of making money for future investment and for shareholders, but it has to be within reason - and there has to be a morality in there. Price hikes like these boost the take unreasonably for shareholders (most of whom are, if not already wealthy, at least not poor) at the expense of the end users - many of whom ARE poor and should not be fleeced to line the pockets of said shareholders - and, yes, I DO have a portfolio of shares which includes 2 companies in the energy sector. I just don't feel comfortable with seeing people I know almost in tears about where the money is going to come from to pay the new bills.

    Report on 02 December 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 22Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 22 months (2.9% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable). Refund offer reduces handling fee from 2.9% to equivalent 1.7% (Ts&Cs apply)

Virgin Money MasterCard

0% for 20 months (2.99% fee) Representative 16.8% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 16.8% APR (variable). Purchase rate 16.8% PA (variable).

Barclaycard Low Fee Platinum Visa

0% for 17 months (1.6% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest