Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Politics and Finance

The worrying growth of mortgage fraud

John Fitzsimons
by Lovemoney Staff John Fitzsimons on 06 August 2009  |  Comments 4 comments

The FSA, for once, is doing the right thing by being tough on those found to be breaking the rules.

The FSA comes in for a lot of criticism, and rightly so.

The last few years have demonstrated how badly it took its eye off the ball, preferring to concentrate on initiatives like Treating Customers Fairly rather than really monitoring what some of the firms under its command were up to.

However, now and again, it does something right and its crackdown on mortgage fraud is a cause for optimism.

Over the last three years, the regulator has banned more than 60 mortgage brokers for committing mortgage fraud. Now that might not sound like a lot, but the vast, vast majority of bannings have taken place in the last 18 months or so.

I have always been a champion of independent financial advice, and I always will be. But, as with any industry, the mortgage broker sector has its fair share of bad eggs. And the FSA's investigations have revealed just what those bad eggs have been up to.

In most cases, the FSA has reported the broker knowingly submitted false information, or even falsified documentation to support spurious claims about the applicant's income.

Just last week, in the most recent banning, the broker in question was found to have submitted at least three applications which he knew included lies.

The scale of the mortgage fraud problem has only really emerged since the onset of the credit crunch, and while the figures remain relatively small compared to other forms of fraud, it's a significant enough area for the National Fraud Strategic Authority (now simply the National Fraud Authority) to have devoted most of its first year in operation to the matter.

According to the KPMG Fraud Barometer, 18 cases of mortgage fraud - with a combined value of £24m - were brought to the courts in the first half of 2009. That's compared to 25 cases worth £36m in the whole of 2008.

The test now is in ensuring that the guilty parties are then prosecuted - fraud is, after all, against the law, and prohibition from advising on regulated financial matters is not nearly punishment enough.

And it goes without saying that should your mortgage adviser ever suggest the odd fib on your application, you should not only refuse, but also report them to the authorities. Brokers, as a whole, do a great job, but their reputation is tarnished by some of the dodgier individuals still involved in the industry.

It's up to all of us to make sure they are flushed out.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (4)

  • SevenPillars
    Love rating 62
    SevenPillars said

    SiG126

    To my mind there's a big distinction between exaggerating my income to get a bigger loan...

    --------------------------------------------------

    There isn't, if you do this you are committing fraud and contributing towards creating a distorted housing market in terms of house prices. If everybody were to lie, then prices would obviously go up further and further. Eventually, this bubble would have to burst, creating systemic risk and danger to the economy. Oh, surprise, surprise, that's what happened.

    It would appear the temptation to commit fraud goes on.

    http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article6695319.ece

    Report on 10 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • SevenPillars
    Love rating 62
    SevenPillars said

    Tougher rules to ban liars loans.

    Will the FSA, BoE, Government and NFSA follow through or continue to turn a blind eye as they have done since about 2000?

    13 May 2009

    At

    a conference on the future of the industry, a senior FSA official

    pointed out that by 2007, at the height of the lending boom, 45% of all

    mortgages were being granted without the lenders checking if the

    borrower's stated income was correct.

    It is now clear that the FSA has this sort of practice very much in its sights.

    "We

    have found substantive evidence of irresponsible lending and inadequate

    affordability assessment," said Jon Pain, a managing director at the

    FSA.

    "We will ask whether we should change our rules to require

    income verification for all mortgages, with lenders required to verify

    the plausibility and authenticity of the documentation by the customer

    before an offer is made," he added.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8047383.stm

    Report on 10 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 22Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 22 months (2.9% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable). Refund offer reduces handling fee from 2.9% to equivalent 1.7% (Ts&Cs apply)

Virgin Money MasterCard

0% for 20 months (2.99% fee) Representative 16.8% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 16.8% APR (variable). Purchase rate 16.8% PA (variable).

Barclaycard Low Fee Platinum Visa

0% for 17 months (1.6% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest