Auto-enrolment: pensions are getting better, but nobody knows it

John Fitzsimons
by Lovemoney Staff John Fitzsimons on 14 May 2012  |  Comments 5 comments

Guest blogger Graham Boffey of Aviva looks at the benefits of auto-enrolment to our pensions, and why so few of us even know it's happening.

Auto-enrolment: pensions are getting better, but nobody knows it

How many of us have thought about what we will live on in retirement recently? Probably very few if we are being honest; it is just not as compelling a topic of conversation as house prices are for most of us. But, like it or not, we all need to be putting money aside and thinking about saving for when we stop working if we want to enjoy a comfortable retirement.

Greater life expectancy and the impact of inflation have all contributed to the average pensioner’s income being below a ‘comfortable’ level. Recent figures from Aviva show that the UK pensions gap is estimated at being over £10,000 per person, per year.

The issue is that the state pension system was just not designed to deal with so many people in retirement, and we are not saving enough ourselves. Successive governments have wrestled with this and have struggled to find a solution to this growing problem. But soon – in the next few months – arguably the biggest shake-up to UK pensions for more than 100 years will start to be rolled out.

From October this year, the UK’s largest employers will be required to automatically enrol their employees into workplace pension savings scheme for the first time, and over the next few years this will impact on every worker earning more than £8,105 a year. Employers will be required to pay into a workplace retirement savings account for each employee, unless you decide to opt out.

For something this big, it is worrying to find that more than two-thirds (68%) of private sector employees have little or no understanding of automatic-enrolment. But even more of a concern is that Aviva’s Working Lives report found 37% of employees say they will opt out of the scheme, with 49% of saying they simply just can’t afford it.

At present, while the majority of people agree that a pension is the best way to save for retirement (56%), and a similar number say their employer already offers a workplace pension (54%), the number of private sector employees actually saving into a workplace pension is comparatively low at 35%.

The reasons why this is low again comes down to money, with 55% of employees saying they don’t have the spare cash to contribute to a pension, 28% saying they need to repay debts, and 20% need to pay for immediate family costs. As such, while the Government will be keen to reduce the number of potential opt-outs before auto-enrolment goes live, we cannot expect to see a step-change in the way people save for their retirement immediately.

The message that people need to start to understand is that you need to be saving now for retirement if you want to be able to enjoy a ‘comfortable’ lifestyle . It doesn’t need to be huge amounts at first, but the earlier we begin the savings habit the more likely we are to carry it through the whole of our working lives and the more chance we have of a comfortable retirement.

The onus is on the Government, the industry and employers to explain the benefits of auto-enrolment. However, if you don’t feel that you understand or have had it explained clearly to you then you need to ask for more information – whether it’s online, from family and friends or from a financial adviser.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (5)

  • AlanThomas
    Love rating 24
    AlanThomas said

    I had a conversation with my son last week (he is 28) concerning pensions & savings for the future, he has had a look at my statements of my private pensions plans over the last 25 years and decided (due to poor performace) that this is not the route for him.

    'Pensions' are an investment vehicle, they can rise and fall...& ...fall...and even fail.

    Spread your risk!

    Report on 14 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Stargazer
    Love rating 11
    Stargazer said

    Alan, if your son's employed and his employer would be making reasonable contributions to his pension it's likely to be in his interests to take them, since even a poorly performing pension is likely to yield more in the end than other investment vehicles if he's being given extra contributions for nothing. If he's self-employed, however, the case is less clear-cut.

    Report on 14 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • meldrewreborn
    Love rating 45
    meldrewreborn said

    Auto enrolement is good. What the individual puts in is more than matched by the employer /government in tax relief. Even if the fund performs relatively badly, the individual will be better off in retirement than would otherwise have been the case. There are risks of course, but the risk to economic stability in the future if we do nothing is even worse. People have to take responsibility for their retirement years, its not fair or reasonable that those who save nothing for retirement get bailed out by the general taxpayer. And sticking one's head in the sand and wishing/hoping that it'll all come right in the end doesn't work any more.

    The doubters need to wise up and face facts, perhaps putting of the next purchase of the latest mobile phone as a consequence.

    Report on 14 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • katchytitle
    Love rating 0
    katchytitle said

    I believe auto-enrollment is the only way we can fix the pension problem in this country as most people just don't understand that they need to save for their retirement.

    However, creating auto-enrollment may cause an economic crash in our service/consumer economy. By taking this demand out of everyone's paycheck you are essentially reducing their ability to spend in the economy thereby depressing the UK retail economy even further. Its like making everyone take an 8% pay cut...its going to be horrendous - especially for those that are reeling from high rental prices and food inflation.

    Report on 21 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Susanne
    Love rating 22
    Susanne said

    In general, the idea is sound, but there are some problems with it: for one thing, it is not clear that present or future governments will keep their word to people who put into NEST. In fact, our current and past governments have raided existing pension pots far too often in the recent past for anyone to trust in this shiny new idea. I suppose they must be hoping that most people won't notice or not want to make the effort to opt out, since 'in' is the default position.

    The second problem is that the fees the government is planning to charge are quite a bit higher than you'd pay if you invested privately, if you shop around and know what you're doing.

    NEST is not a guarantee of improved standard of living in retirement. There's no telling how well you will be off in retirement--that depends entirely on how your investments will do over time. Only two things are a certain: one is that you will end up with a 5% paycut over the rest of your working life (how high your paycut is depends on how much your employer puts into your NEST; I'm assuming 5% since employers must put in 3 of the required 8%). The second certainty is that the government will make a mint off your retirement money. What they're charging in fees, 0.3% yearly plus a 1.8% contribution fee, is somewhere between high and outrageous. In the US, nobody would dream of paying more than 0.1% for anyone to manage your fund; in the UK, 0.5% is about as much as any sane person would agree to pay. Remember Einstein saying that cumulative interest is the greatest financial power in the world? What this means is that the government will walk off with by far the largest part of your pension pot, just in fees. No pension manager on the free market would survive for a month if they charged fees like that.

    Thankfully, I am working for a firm that has a pension scheme, so this doesn't apply to me. But if it did, I'd opt out faster than you can say 'Raid my pension pot,' invest privately if I could, as soon as I could, and as long as I could, and take a good, hard look at the fees I'm paying.

    Report on 30 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3