Hargreaves Lansdown is hitting my pension

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 28 November 2011  |  Comments 3 comments

Hargreaves Lansdown is going to charge higher fees on my pension.

Hargreaves Lansdown is hitting my pension

I’ve written many times that I think it’s really important that people should save for their retirements. Here is one example.

So I’ve always been a big fan of lovemoney.com’s pension scheme for its employees. The scheme is a Group Sipp operated by Hargreaves Lansdown.

The great thing about the scheme is that offers lots of investment choice. As a result I’ve got a wide range of different investments in my Sipp. These include:

-          HSBC FTSE All Share Index

-          HSBC American Index

-          2 actively managed investment trusts. One invests in the UK companies, one in emerging markets 

-          2 of the largest companies in the FTSE 100 index 

-          1 of the largest companies on the US stock market 

-          3 smaller companies on the London market 

I accept that some of my investment decisions haven’t followed the conventional wisdom and, who know, I may regret them in ten years’ time. But at least I’ve been given the freedom to make my own choices. That kind of freedom would not be on offer in many workplace pension schemes.

The other big plus point is that Hargreaves Lansdown charges low fees. So there are no charges for setting up the Sipp or for contributions. Hargreaves also doesn’t charge an annual management fee for more than 2400 funds.

Admittedly, I do have to pay a 0.5% annual charge to Hargreaves for my investments in shares and investment trusts.  But when it comes to my two HSBC funds, I don’t have to pay any annual charge to Hargreaves, just a small charge to HSBC.

In fact, the overall charge I’m paying for the HSBC funds is super-low at 0.27%. That’s because both of these funds are index tracker funds that don’t employ expensive fund managers. Instead they just buy all the shares in a particular index.

Sadly, however, this is set to change. Citywire has spotted that from December 31st, Hargreaves Lansdown will charge its own extra fee for HSBC tracker funds. This will be a ‘Platform fee’ of £2 a month or £24 a year.  This charge will also be applied to most other tracker funds and will dramatically increase costs for many investors.

So why is Hargreaves doing this?

The main reason is that more people are investing in tracker funds.

Hargreaves has built its business around actively managed funds where a highly-paid fund manager picks individual shares and hopes to beat the market. Fund management companies often levy an annual management charge for active funds that is as high as 1.5%. Hargreaves then gets a cut if people invest in the fund via the Hargreaves site.

So Hargreaves can make good money from actively managed funds whilst not having to levy its own charge. But when it comes to index trackers, Hargreaves either gets a very small fee from the fund management company or no fee at all.

As index trackers have become more popular,  Hargreaves has decided that it has introduce its own charge. In fairness, Hargreaves says that the new charge will enable it to offer much more information about tracker funds on its website, but I suspect that is just window dressing.

And anyway, given a choice between more information accompanied by a platform fee, or no information with no platform fee, I’d go for the cheapest option every time.

I’m saddened that Hargreaves is introducing this ‘platform fee’ especially since it will hit people with smaller pension pots the hardest. If you’ve invested £1000 in an HSBC tracker fund, the £24 platform fee will effectively be a 2.4% annual charge. But if you’ve invested £10,000 in an HSBC tracker, the platform fee is equivalent to a 0.24% annual charge.

It will be interesting to see if the other major Sipp providers adopt the same policy sooner or later. I fear that they will. For many of us, trackers are about to become a bit more expensive.

More:  Quality free advice on your pension 

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (3)

  • russbiker
    Love rating 40
    russbiker said

    I think it's fair that HL should charge a fee (I have a Fidelity Moneybuilder tracker myself in my SIPP), but £2pm is just too much; it should be £1pm max. This would also probably encourage more business: I believe Alliance don't charge a fee.

    I have also heard that HL are soon to introduce Vantage trackers whose ultra-low charges could at least help to offset the fee. If they do, I'll be switching my Fidelity.

    Report on 01 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Luniversal
    Love rating 41
    Luniversal said

    Alliance Trust Savings already has Vanguard trackers on its platform with no fees (as of now) and moderately small minimum investment levels.

    HL must be anticipating the Retail Distribution Review coming down on trail commission, and finding other ways to milk the client. But it made its name and fortune as an exec-only broker. How hard is it to walk away if it gets too grasping? (To be fair, it cut its dealing commissions earlier this year, so the signals are mixed.)

    But I recommend that aggrieved customers hold their fire pending the RDR. There is going to be a kaleidoscopic shake-up in charging arrangements, and we don't know how it will settle down.

    Report on 01 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

ING Direct
Savings Account

3.10% /
3.06%
Monthly Apply

Derbyshire BS
NetSaver Issue 3

3.06% /
3.06%
Yearly Apply

Post Office®
Online Saver Issue 4

3.01% /
3.01%
Yearly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest