The danger of ignoring your pension!

Bob Bullivant
by Lovemoney Staff Bob Bullivant on 01 September 2011  |  Comments 1 comment

Many of us are happy to forget about pension once it's opened and set up, but this can be an expensive error.

The danger of ignoring your pension!

If ever there was a demonstration of why companies have been keen to ditch defined benefit (final salary) pension schemes it has come in the past few weeks, when we have seen violent fluctuations in world stock markets.

Those lucky enough to be given the promise of a pension based on their final salary can sit back secure in the knowledge that the extra costs associated with this fall in stock values will be picked up by their companies. For those in money purchase schemes the cost is all theirs – particularly for those close to retirement.

This makes absolutely clear the transfer of risk that occurs when a company closes its defined benefit schemes and moves to a basis where they pay a contribution to an employee’s individual pension fund (known as defined contribution) – all investment risk is passed to the employee in one swoop.

For many employees this is the only time they get anywhere near the stock market and so they are the ones who are most badly hurt when markets fall just as they reach retirement. It never ceases to amaze me the number of people who get to retirement and are still invested in equities. So much so that Annuity Direct commissioned some research into the probability of a stock market fall in the twelve months prior to retirement. Using stochastic modelling techniques the research estimates that there is a one in twenty chance of losing over 22% of the value of a pension fund in those 12 months.

My experience is that most people start a pension fund and then forget all about it. We call it ‘set and forget’. The problem is exacerbated by annual statements that are less than helpful, and a general lack of interest in pensions until the last minute when it is too late.

So when is the right time? What should be done?

The defined benefit scheme does have a significant advantage in that the fund runs continuously and can make investments for the long term – moving equities to bonds to meet liabilities when conditions are favourable. Some defined contribution schemes use so-called lifestyling which switches out of equities in the five years before retirement. This is comparatively new, having only been introduced in the nineties. For older policies, which are the ones maturing now, this does not exist.

The key is that in the ten years before retirement, pension funds should be reviewed at least annually. This is the time when there may be excess cash and the generous tax reliefs can be very attractive – particularly to higher rate tax payers. Policy holders should not be afraid to lock in gains and lose potential further growth in the equity markets. There are also arrangements which allow continued equity exposure but a guarantee against loss.

In short, do not set and forget – it can be very expensive!

Bob Bullivant is chief executive of Annuity Direct

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (1)

  • sodit
    Love rating 105
    sodit said

    One of the problems with pensions is that the rules keep getting changed which mess up your calculations.

    For example, with my defined contributions pension, when I invested money in it I was promised that those sums would grow tax free until I retired. Some swindlers then went and changed the rules retrospectively. This meant that I had invested significant sums under a false prospectus. If I solicited funds under a false prospectus I would go to gaol. It is only different for Gordon Brown because Parliament is sovereign so his deceit is not criminal, but it still is crooked.

    Then when I started work in the public sector, I was promised a final salary pension. The government is now in the process of changing that to an average salary pension. They say that they cannot afford to pay the money promised. If I entered into a deal with the government and 10 years down the line found I couldn't pay the sums promised, would they let me off the hook? No. So why should I let them off the hook? If they've got no money, why should their other creditors be preferred over me?

    The problem with pensions is that they represent a pile of wealth so large that governments cannot resist thieving it.

    Report on 01 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

ING Direct
Savings Account

3.10% /
3.06%
Monthly Apply

Derbyshire BS
NetSaver Issue 3

3.06% /
3.06%
Yearly Apply

Post Office®
Online Saver Issue 4

3.01% /
3.01%
Yearly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using Three Kings