Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Buying and selling property

Property market won't recover until sellers and agents get real

eMoov
by Lovemoney Staff eMoov on 14 August 2012  |  Comments 11 comments

Russell Quirk, director of online estate agent eMoov.co.uk, argues that until the penny drops with sellers and estate agents, the property market will continue to struggle.

Property market won't recover until sellers and agents get real

We’ve all heard the pundits bandying around those stock phrases related to the demise of the UK property market. If I had a penny every time someone mentioned the ‘banks’ reluctance to lend’ or ‘lack of serious buyers’ I'd be pretty well off by now.

But what if I was to tell you that the only thing stalling the UK property market is the failure of agents to manage expectations? This is due to the fear of losing an instruction and the unrealistic expectations of sellers.

Although it’s easy to lay into the banks and their reluctance to lend, the number of available mortgage products has actually more than trebled since 2009, and there are now more higher loan to value mortgage products on the market.

Also, there’s no proof that people aren’t looking to buy. In fact, one third of the adult population visits property portals, either online or on the high street, each month. Admittedly, it doesn’t mean they are necessarily looking to buy, but a significant number will be.

According to the Nationwide, UK property prices have fallen an average of 13% since their 2007 peak. Is this drop because sellers are putting their properties on the market at lower prices than 2007 levels? In a lot of cases it isn’t – many sellers are still marketing at close to 2007 levels, but are then having to accept offers 10-20% lower than the asking price to get a buyer to bite.

The truth is that agents are overvaluing properties to secure instructions, and sellers – who quite rightly want to get the highest possible price for their homes – are allowing their egos to be massaged.

But a property is only worth what a buyer will pay for it. And, thanks to the internet making sold prices freely available, buyers are armed with more accurate and relevant data than ever before.

Months later, when the ‘for sale’ sign starts growing moss and the agent tells the buyer they should consider dropping the asking price, it becomes all too clear that the initial valuation was not representative of the local market.

Then agents shrug their shoulders and blame the ‘banks’ reluctance to lend’ and a ‘lack of serious buyers’ and disappointed sellers accept their excuses. And we’re still no closer to breaking that vicious circle.

Russell Quirk is director of online estate agent eMoov.co.uk

What do you think? Is Russell right? Are estate agents telling vendors what they want to hear in order to win the instruction? Do vendors still have unrealistic expectations of what their homes are worth? Let us know your thoughts in the comment box below.

More on buying and selling property:

What to do when a home survey goes wrong

When should you stop renting and buy?

Buying is cheaper than renting

How to deal with property chain problems

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (11)

  • The Bank Manager
    Love rating 72
    The Bank Manager said

    House prices are over inflated everywhere and there can only be a few pockets where properties are priced at levels that someone is willing to pay.

    Regrettably, that is the multi-million pound penthouse, since that's an ego trip for those, but can £4m properties sell, or even £1m - £1.5m. No, as some customers I've heard about within my area have found to their disappointment.

    Generally, people are too greedy, which causes the next person to state that they cannot afford to sell their house, as the one they are looking to buy is too expensive, or alternatively if looking to move down-market (say to release equity for retirement), then those people are - understandably - trying to maximise their liquidity for that purpose.

    Report on 16 August 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    Actually, I don't think greed has anything to do with it. When our leaders promote a capitalist society, based on buying low and selling high, it is no wonder the man or woman in the street wants as much as possible for their asset.

    Many companies employ economists who will work out the ideal price to sell a product at, based on branding etc., which is not related whatsoever to the manufacturing or production costs. The food industry is a classic case where the producer, the farmer, is paid peanuts for their produce, while the end user, the consumer, pays over the odds, allowing the middleman, the retail chain, to maximise profits.

    Now, with a society based on buying low and selling high, no wonder people want the best price possible. Is this really greed, or just common sense.

    Would someone be accused of being stupid if they offered a property at only 80% of its market value, when other home owners in the area were achieving 100%, or 110%? You could sell cheaply for a quick sale, but how cheap do you go, and would this encourage others in the chain to sell cheap, or would they want to CAPITALISE on buying lower?

    It is easy to label the common man and woman as greedy, but I don't see anyone jumping to the defence of the common man and woman by forcing the energy companies to price their fuels justly, or forcing the refineries to sell petrol and diesel at a realistic price, rather than their artificially inflated prices.

    Greed? Not really. It is more of an expectation. Besides, if I sold my home for 50% of its value, I am sure that someone would snap it up then try to sell it for 100% of its value. That someone would probably be an estate agent.

    Report on 23 August 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2