Teens should be forced to learn the value of money

StepChange Debt Charity
by Lovemoney Staff StepChange Debt Charity on 06 September 2011  |  Comments 13 comments

It's high time the Government added school lessons on how to spend money properly!

Teens should be forced to learn the value of money

It’s a constant refrain from parents that teens “don’t know the value of money”. They squander their allowances and wages, spending money on nights out rather than paying the bills. Can this change? Can The Inbetweeners learn to budget?

It’s a stereotype that teens spend their money without a care in the world. They’re young, they want to enjoy life and they want to be free of parental influence. However this can come at a cost to their long-term financial wellbeing.

Here at CCCS, we found that in 2010, 753 of the “Inbetweener generation” (those aged 18-19 years old) contacted us to seek advice on how to deal their debt; the average amount owed was £2,254. These numbers are slightly down on 2009, but up on 2008.

Taken together it may not sound like much debt to be in, or many people contacting us for help, but if this is indicative of the wider population it’s a worrying development, especially as credit isn’t available until the age of 18.

We respect their decision to contact a debt help charity. They’re focusing on solving their problems straightaway rather than burying their head in the sand and finding that the debt snowballs.

But the fact remains that young adults shouldn’t be coming straight out of school and falling straight into debt.

Budget, budget, budget

Why are older teens getting into unmanageable debt? Around 10% of 18-19 year olds who contact us don’t know how to budget, and that this has been a key cause of their money troubles. They hadn’t understood how to spend their money wisely so they’d just spent, not taking the consequences into account.

This goes back to our continual refrain to budget (whatever your age). Knowing what’s coming in and going out of your bank account is key to staying in the black successfully. This doesn’t just help your financial health but also your mental and physical health.

We encourage everyone to use a tool like lovemoney.com’s Tracker to log their income and expenditure, and keep tabs on their finances. While that won’t eliminate the threat of falling into debt, it’ll reduce the chance of it happening (and also reducing the odds that a life shock – job loss or bereavement – cause significant financial harm).

Learning how to budget effectively is a key skill in the modern world and one that everyone must learn.

Financial education

CCCS are here to help cure the problem, but what about prevention? How do we stop it occurring in the first place?

To help prevent debt being a constant issue in the future we’d like to see compulsory financial education in the school curriculum.

There is already a non-statutory (optional) programme choice at Key Stage 3 (an equivalent of the first few years of senior school, for those of us who haven’t been a pupil for many years) called Importance of economic wellbeing and financial capability. This course includes “personal budgeting, money management and a range of financial products and services”.

We’d like to see this programme become compulsory, so kids know how to budget before they’re thrown in at the deep end without any instructions on how to swim.

This ties in with our charity’s remit. Our code of ethics encourages an understanding of personal finance:

"We aim to help people understand money in order that they can manage their money better and use credit wisely"

We know that this isn’t a new problem – our generations weren’t perfect. After all, the average age of our clients is 38 years old and the most indebted age group is the 55-59 year olds. We also know that teaching kids financial responsibility won’t suddenly make them model citizens that juggle their commitments with ease.

But our generation have had to learn from our own mistakes (if you think you haven’t, use our debt counselling service to help find a solution) and we don’t want the next generation to make the same poor choices.

If education helps them avoid debt and start out in adult life as they mean to go on, it’ll mean they do finally understand the value of money.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (13)

  • SamJR
    Love rating 3
    SamJR said

    As a part of the "inbetweeners generation" and having started full-time work for the first time just over a year ago, I could not agree with this article more. Teenagers need to be educated more about debt and money management. With the rising popularity of payday loan companies, anyone with a job can easily bankrupt themselves as they find themselves "creditworthy" enough to take out large unsecured loans with unmanagably large interest rates.

    I live at home with my parents and last year I earnt around £28k. My total debt today stands at £5,550 with about £1,500 of high interest debt that I can't imagine myself paying off for a long time and it only looks set to increase.

    The issue discussed in this article is a real one and needs to be noticed by those in government.

    Report on 08 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    This is another useful blog. I don't think David Cameron will help, he can't help himself and you can't force teenagers to do anything. They need encouragement from parents and teachers to learn to be financially responsible. Parents can say no to smart phones and that would help. A smart phone costs at least £10 a month to run with Giff Gaff, more in most cases. Children can learn and this can be the start of a career if finance is integrated into the curriculum. Energy saving can be integrated into physics (remember physics? Before media studies became popular?), accounting can be integrated into mathematics, understanding food and nutrition can be integrated into chemistry and biology, the history of money can be integrated in to history studies, in geography they can learn how well off they are compared to kids in other countries, in physical education they can learn the economics of keeping fit without going to the gym and in English they can teach the little dears how to communicate effectively in writing so they can write a decent CV.

    They need to learn how to be thrifty and frugal, I wrote a thrifty blog today - http://wp.me/p194MF-oQ

    I did energy saving in physics, I did English language and literature, chemistry, biology, economic history, geography, art, woodwork, and the traditional subjects. I was deprived, no sociology, no media studies and I even missed home economics; but I still cook - just not rock cakes...

    I look forward to the comments from Comprehensive educated Sun readers...

    Report on 08 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • killick_becki
    Love rating 58
    killick_becki said

    If you agree with this post, please sign the government petition asking for them to make financial education compulsory:

    http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/8903

    If the number of signatures gets to 100,000 then the MPs have to debate it in parliament.

    Report on 08 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    @killick_becki, I signed the e_petition, tweeted it to my friends and shared it on LinkedIn and Facebook; lets hope other financially responsible people will do the same. We could have future generations that are thrifty and frugal and reject the plastic credit card society.

    Report on 08 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • OorWullie
    Love rating 38
    OorWullie said

    During my teenage years I earned so little money (but was always in work) that it was spent almost within hours of being paid and this lasted until I married aged 24. Like the young of today I had no worries in the world and wanted to enjoy life. Fatherhood came shortly after marriage and within a few short years I was the father of 3 daughters and there was no child allowance nor other State help available; indeed, even rented housing was extremely scarce and the rental expensive. The sense of responsibility of having to care for those 3 girls of mine was the best motivation to economise so my wife and I had to decide on what was necessary and what was unnecessary just to keep us alive. We could not have a cup of tea unless it was within the budget and even the tea leaves had to be counted. The only way out of this poverty was to seek work that paid better and this is what I spent the remainder of my life doing. I left school aged 14 after which there was no way back into education except possibly evening classes or night school but I was far too pre-occupied earning my corn that evening education was not an option. I started work as an office boy and retired as a CEO on a reasonable pension but just prior to retiring Margaret Thatcher's government was in power and it altered the indexation-linkage to pensions which, rather than maintaining the value of pensions (which was the promise) it placed all pensions on an annual depreciation scale. In my latter years of working budgeting was always a consideration and it is something to which I have become accustomed but now into my 23rd year of retirement I am back to a budget-income and have debts of £11,000 which I can't seem to shift! The relentless rise in the cost-of-living places considerable difficulties to clearing this debt which is, and has been, due to the here-today, gone-tomorrow brigade's decision making. Manifestly the message is that Government creates the problems which over half the population is compelled to suffer. When the cost-of-living is high and average earnings low then an under-class in society arises and today's climate is the legacy of the Thatcher government. Do not expect David Cameron to resolve the long standing issues of the Tory party. In life the plot may have changed slightly but the theme remains the same.

    Report on 08 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • mambach
    Love rating 33
    mambach said

    Dear Sirs

    1) Financial education already IS on the school curriculum. So are algebra, critical evaluation, communication and a foreign language - yet many school graduates know none of these things.

    2) Curricula are largely set by educators - last time I checked, Mr C does not have the requisite qualifications and experience to teach, and therefore to decide how much teaching is possible. Politicians should stick to what they're good at - kissing babies and building duck houses

    3) Due to constant tinkering, ideal teaching time for all the elements in mandatory and recommended teaching already comes to nearly 150% of the teaching week. Are you prepared for the tax hike to pay teachers to run school on Saturdays?

    4) School can only do so much. Perhaps we ought to also address the society that measures success by aquisition - we expect yougsters to borrow to educate or buy a house, why are we surprised when they conclude that borrowing money is normal?

    Many thanks,

    a teacher

    Report on 08 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Winker Watson
    Love rating 12
    Winker Watson said

    It's David Cameron who should be forced to learn the value of money.

    Report on 08 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • lunartick
    Love rating 5
    lunartick said

    It's also up to the parents to teach their kids about the value of money.

    My children earn their pocket money from me.

    I talk to them about prices and weights and value for money when we are shopping (so they can notice when Tesco/Asda/Sainsburys are pulling a fast one!).

    I teach them about looking for 'real' bargains on things we need (not what we want, as want is not what we need, and usually a waste of money. But sometimes it's ok, as a treat).

    I teach them about 'what is a scam' - so when I'm not around, they can look after themselves and not get sucked in.

    I teach them about saving up for things and never to borrow, then it's theirs to keep at the end of the day.

    I also talked to them about not producing babies until they have enough money to (get possibly married) settle down with somewhere to live. (Especially my son - about having babies, being tricked into having babies, and having to pay for them - means you then end up with not much money)

    I hope I do a good job.

    My kids are 12 and 10, and at the moment, are very sensible with what they have - they like to see the total go up and up in their Building Society book each time they put some money in.

    My daughter (12) on Mother's day, looked for a particular bear for me (sweet...) dragging her brother with her. She was so proud of herself having found a £20 bear reduced to £5!! That meant she had more money to buy some chocs - which we all scoffed!

    Report on 08 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • msmoneywise
    Love rating 27
    msmoneywise said

    I agree with both Winker and Lunartick. The government's profligacy is such that they can't teach anyone to budget. And yes, it is the parent's job to teach their kids the value of money. I was a single parent from the time my only child, my son, was 8 and we didn't have the benefit of regular maintenance payments or any other financial support from his father, so he had to learn very early in life that there were things he couldn't have. He also learned that he had to contribute once he started work at 15, and did give some of his earnings towards the household bills.

    Today he shuns credit cards though he has one for emergencies. At 25 he has only had to use his credit card once, and paid it off as soon as he could. Though I offered to pay it all off and he could repay me, he refused, because he wanted to do this himself. He may not save a lot, but he has enough to get by. And he will soon start a very well-paid job (later this month) and hopes to get enough put by to retire at 50!

    Report on 09 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sodit
    Love rating 127
    sodit said

    20 years after she left office, Maggie T is still being blamed for the present situation. Anyone would think that there hadn't been 13 years of Labour government in between. If things are wrong today, rather than blame a government that is now history, how about blaming the government who failed to redress something that was evidently wrong?

    Money education in schools is an absolute necessity, then, perhaps we will never ever again get a chancellor of the exchequor as ignorant and destructive as Gordon Brown, or a shadow chancellor as stupid as the innumerate Ed Balls.

    Report on 11 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • The Bank Manager
    Love rating 72
    The Bank Manager said

    Here's a GREAT bit of PR for the Banks.....

    If the Government are not putting the effort into doing this, then I'm very proud that at my childrens school, NatWest volunteered a member of staff to visit to teach - yes, teach - Year 6 (ages 10-11) about the value of money and how to save, before spending i.e. budgeting.

    This was for about an hour over a single lesson and under their MoneySense banner, on the www.natwest.com website and discussed various forms of savings, whether short, medium or long term, explained interest rates (net & gross) and various forms of cards, such as budget cards, debit cards and credit cards.

    The 'pack' they received was really detailed and did not 'sell' Bank products at all, but stuck to relevant information, having had a look at it and it's pretty informative.

    When you go to the website, that too, lends itself (pardon the pun!) to varying ages of people, from children through to teens and then, we grown-ups.

    I'm unable to see if any other Banks do this in such a format, but it would be helpful get feedback.

    It appears after all, that my industry is not loaded with parasites who think of their bonuses and not give a monkeys about the public.

    My own role is there to help my Bank's customers that are in financial difficulty and I'm proud of what I do.

    This is reinforced moreso, when after having resolved a customer's problem, I have to return them to either their Manager or Branch and a number are reluctant to 'leave', as they advise the service and support they've received from me, is superior to that which they've had previously.

    Perhaps thats owing to my own 29 years within the Bank, from the days of putting cheques and statements in envelopes, right through the branch roles in between and becoming a Risk Manager now.

    Report on 18 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • moneysucks
    Love rating 0
    moneysucks said

    You are absolutely correct that money education should start in schools and that a budget is the key to understanding money, as we discuss in our podcast at http://moneysucks.net/category/podcasts/sixty-second-tips/episode-1/

    Only by knowing what is coming in and going out eveery month can you take contriol of your money, rather than letting your money take control of tyou.

    And if money eductaion started in the schools then you are also correct when you say that this would act as a preventative measure and parhaps stop pwople lurching from crisis to crisis

    Report on 22 September 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jakeyoung
    Love rating 0
    jakeyoung said

    Good article, very relevant and hot topic in my household. As an added incentive to my daughter who is paying off c/c debt, I have agreed to contribute $ for $ to her cause. I agree that there is room for better education in schools on the issue, perhaps some sort of simulation over the course of a term?

    Report on 18 October 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2