Bash the bankers

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 15 October 2009  |  Comments 5 comments

A bunch of bankers got lucky. Very lucky. They should now pay a dividend to the people who made that good fortune possible. You and me. The ordinary taxpayers.

Peter Mandelson was surprisingly forceful about banker bonuses on Channel Four News tonight. 

Jon Snow asked Mandy whether he had a 'stick' he could use to punish the bankers after Goldman Sachs' record payouts

Mandy replied 'yes.' The FSA could increase the amounts of capital that Goldman is required to hold. That would reduce profitability in future years. 

Now that's fine as far as it goes. I'm delighted that Mandelson recognises this is a serious problem. But I think there's another possible solution. 

Why don't we impose a windfall profits tax on JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs? 

I'd normally shy away from windfall taxes. Why should the government punish businesses for no other crime than being successful? 

But this is a very different situation. Both banks have prospered thanks to the rescue effort of the US and UK governments. Working together, these governments could now impose such a tax. 

Sure, Goldman has paid back the state aid it received, and yes, Goldman and Morgan were a bit more prudent than many of their rivals during the boom. And that prudence was one of the reasons they survived. 

But it was only one reason. The massive government rescue of the financial system created an environment in which Goldman and JP Morgan could prosper. What's more, it was an environment in which the two giants of Wall Street suddenly faced remarkably little competition. 

Let's get real. A bunch of bankers got lucky. Very lucky. They should now pay a dividend to the people who made that good fortune possible. You and me. The ordinary taxpayers. 

Postscript: Yes, Goldman and JP Morgan would no doubt do their best to avoid the tax through the clever use of loopholes and tax havens. It might be a tough fight for governments and regulators. But it's a battle that needs to be fought. And if the whole of G20 was signed up to the fight, I think the governments just might win....

> Check out more of my blog posts.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (5)

  • gordonbanks42
    Love rating 11
    gordonbanks42 said

    I think you were right the first time Ed - windfall taxes are a bad idea.

    Also, the taxpayers of the UK had naff all to do with rescuing Goldman or JP Morgan - it was the US Govt which did that with US taxpayers' money, so it's up to them, not us, to decide whether it's payback time in this case.

    There are some real problems here which a windfall tax will do nothing to alleviate:

    1) why is such a huge proportion of the profits going to the management and staff rather than the shareholders? The shareholders are still playing poodle to the senior mgt of these companies. That's one of the things that allowed us to get into this mess in the first place.

    2) why is it possible to make such huge profits in the first place? Clearly there is not enough competition.

    I think the second of these offers a very persuasive means for Govt to concentrate the minds of GS, JPM and the like, if that's what they want to do.

    Report on 16 October 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Stuart
    Love rating 2
    Stuart said

    The banks seem to have learnt nothing by the last year. Greed rules again. Punishment needs to be more severe

    Report on 18 October 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name Credit rate (AER)
Based on £1
Overdraft
rate

Based on £1
Apply
now

Santander 123 Current Account

0.0% 0% plus £1.00 per day usage fee Apply

first direct 1st Account

N/A 15.9% EAR Apply

Halifax Reward Current Account

N/A 0% plus £2.00 per day usage fee Apply
W3C  Thank you for using The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse