Let's keep stamp duty

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 15 October 2009  |  Comments 5 comments

Estate agents want the government to suspend stamp duty. What nonsense!

Estate agents and other property players are calling for the complete suspension of stamp duty during the housing downturn. 

Special pleading or what? Obviously, estate agents want higher house prices. They think that the abolition of stamp duty will boost demand.  And that will mean more transactions and higher commissions for them on each sale. But I, for one, don't want to see another property boom anytime soon. I welcome the fact that house prices have fallen. 

Now people realise that investing in property is not a guaranteed 'get rich quick' scheme. What's more, it's getting easier for first-time buyers to afford a home. 

In fact, I'd be happy to see house prices fall a bit more next year. That'll make property more affordable for more people. 

Stamp duty has another plus point. It raises cash for the government at a time when the public finances are in a poor state. The government simply can't afford widespread tax cuts at the moment. 

So it makes no sense to abolish stamp duty. The '1808 coalition' of estate agents and landlords is wrong. 

A sensible proposal 

That said, I don't think stamp duty is perfect. The tax is structured in a very strange way. 

As things stand, if a property is sold for £174,500, no stamp duty is charged. But if the property is sold for £176,000, then 1% stamp duty is charged on the whole value of the property. So you'd end up paying £1760. 

Likewise, the rate goes up to 3% at £250,000. So if you sold a property for £251,000, 3% duty would be charged - that's £7530. But if you sold the property for £249,000, stamp duty would only be charged at 1% - that's £2490. 

That's a huge, patently nonsensical difference. 

It would make far more sense to structure stamp duty like income tax. 

Let's say a house was sold for £400,000. Stamp duty could be levied like this: 

£0 to £100,000: 0% 

£100,000 to £200,000:  2% 

£200,000 +: 4% 

Under this structure, the stamp duty bill for this home would be £10000. 

The crucial plus point would be that there would no longer be any incentive to price a home at £249,000 instead of £251,000 just to avoid stamp duty. 

Stamp duty's strange structure is known as the 'slab system.' The '1808 coalition' is campaigning to end the slab system, and, on that point, I'm completely on their side.

More: Why I like the 'mansion tax.'

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (5)

  • Kaideejee
    Love rating 0
    Kaideejee said

    I don't agree with MrRee on his last point at all. Effectively you're saying that cheaper areas overall should have different stamp duty rates on the same value of property - what are you basing this on (apologies, I don't know much about either Lincoln or Maidenhead so I don't know what you're suggesting regarding these two examples)

    All this would achieve is a tax on the area you live in, which would encourage people not to live in those areas and make your house in that area much more difficult to sell, when the bloke across the fields from you (there has to be a border somewhere) has the same basic house, but with half the stamp duty. Could you explain your logic a little further? Thanks.

    -- Kev

    Report on 20 October 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mysterydave
    Love rating 0
    Mysterydave said

    I'm trying to buy my first property and the 1st one has fallen through after the survey (£415) so it looks like I'm going to have to fork out well over £1250 in Stamp Duty I wasn't initially expecting on the next property. This is quite difficult when I'm trying to get together a 20% deposit just shy of 30k, yes 30k :( I'm lucky I've got some inheritence, oh was that taxed? I'm being squeezed and I don't think it should be so difficult to buy somewhere you want to live for a long time. I can't get as good a loan on new builds and people don't want to lose the money they paid for their houses when selling. There needs to be a revolution...too many fat cats at the top of the chain and people at the bottom haven't got a chance. I don't think I'm being greedy wanting a terraced house in Manchester! Give me a break money men. Charge the buy to lets more and second/third homes etc.

    Dave

    Report on 30 November 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name Credit rate (AER)
Based on £1
Overdraft
rate

Based on £1
Apply
now

Santander 123 Current Account

0.0% 0% plus £1.00 per day usage fee Apply

first direct 1st Account

N/A 15.9% EAR Apply

Halifax Reward Current Account

N/A 0% plus £2.00 per day usage fee Apply
W3C  Thank you for using Three Kings