Commodity surge could choke off recovery

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 04 August 2009  |  Comments 2 comments

Rising commodity prices aren’t good news. They mean that strong economic growth is even less likely in the next few years.

Commodity prices have surged this year. Back in February Brent crude oil was trading at $39 a barrel. Now it's at $73. Similarly, the price of copper has surged from $140 to $270 over the same period. Other commodities have followed a similar pattern.

So what's driving these rises?

I can think of two possible explanations:

1. Central banks have delivered too big a monetary stimulus through measures such as low interest rates and quantitative easing. Because the authorities have done too much, inflation is set to take off, and the rising price of commodities is an early warning sign for what lies ahead. 

2. We're in the middle of a massive structural change in the global economy. As India and China surge ahead, they need ever larger amounts of commodities. Yet, at the same time, we're not finding sufficient new deposits of some commodities such as oil. This trend means that commodity prices must rise and we saw that happen in the period before autumn 2008. The economic crisis triggered temporary price falls, but now the world economy is returning to some form of normality, commodity price rises are inevitable. 

So which explanation do I prefer?

Personally, I'm not convinced that we're about to see inflation take off.  Today's UK money supply numbers don't suggest prices are about to get out of hand. (If the money supply grows quickly, inflation is likely as there will be too much money chasing too few goods. But that doesn't seem to be happening at the moment.)

I think the structural change is the much more likely explanation. However, it's still a worrying development. Rising commodity prices will push up inflation in developed countries and that could force central banks to raise interest rates earlier than one might have hoped.

That means that any nascent economic recovery could be slowed down by higher interest rates, and that's not good news.

This just strengthens my belief that several years of slow, anaemic growth lie ahead. Not much fun....

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (2)

  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 39
    LandOfConfusion said

    So what you're saying is that either:

    1. Too much money is being/has been printed and so inflation takes off; or

    2. India and China, competing with everyone else for resources push the price of commodities higher leading to inflation taking off(*).

    And of course if inflation takes off so will interest rates.

    Oh and did I mention that I don't have a mortgage? :)

    (*) I prefer this and the 'speculator' explanation. There is definite evidence that China in particular is having an effect, although speculators betting that an economic recovery is just around the corner also cannot be ruled out.

    Also, M4 money includes the bank's own deposits (reserves) held with the BoE. This money isn't going into the economy because the banks aren't lending and so this measure isn't as useful as it once was.

    Report on 06 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ed Bowsher
    Love rating 76
    Ed Bowsher said

    Hi Landofconfusion,

    Reading my post again, I didn't explain things as well as I should. Yes, I am saying that either scenario leads to inflation and that will mean that any economic recovery will be weak.

    That said, there is a difference between the 2 scenarios. Scenario 1 could lead to inflation rising fast - 'taking off' as i put it. I don't think Scenario 2 would trigger a rapid rise in inflation, but yes it would push prices up.

    Either scenario would lead to a slowdown in any economic recovery.

    Of course, we may get a combination of scenarios 1 and 2. You could say that's what happened in the early 70s. Money supply increased cos US government was spending too much money on Vietnam and new social programmes. Then OPEC pushed up the oil price in '73. Of course, it's not an exact comparison, but then history never repeats itself exactly.

    Ed

    Report on 07 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name Credit rate (AER)
Based on £1
Overdraft
rate

Based on £1
Apply
now

Santander 123 Current Account

0.0% 0% plus £1.00 per day usage fee Apply

first direct 1st Account

N/A 15.9% EAR Apply

Halifax Reward Current Account

N/A 0% plus £2.00 per day usage fee Apply
W3C  Thank you for using Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels