Become a pensions expert in five days - don't panic!

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 02 July 2009  |  Comments 13 comments

Even if you're 50 years old, it's not too late to save for your retirement. My top tip? Don't have a pensions panic!

So now we've run through the main types of pension, you're in a better position to decide whether you need to have a 'pensions panic.'

In summary, if you're a member of a final salary scheme, you've no real need to worry. But you may want to do some extra saving in case the terms of your final salary scheme change before you retire.

If you've made no provision for your retirement and you're just going to rely on the state, I believe you should think about doing something to boost your retirement income. Even if you're relatively old, it's best to adopt a 'better late than never' approach and try to salt some money away for your twilight years.

The only justification for doing nothing is that a small amount of saving may damage your eligibility for means-tested benefits. So the net gain of building a small pension pot - say, £30,000 - might be quite small.  That said, means-tested pension benefits may become even less generous in the future, so I don't think you should assume that you'll definitely receive these benefits in 20 years' time.

If you have a defined contribution scheme, the question is: 'is your pot big enough?' Or: 'will it be big enough when you retire?'

Thing is, you can actually build a surprisingly large pension pot if you save consistently.

Let's imagine you start saving for a pension aged 30. You save £2000 a year every year until you turn 60. We'll assume that the stock market grows at 5% a year on average after inflation. That's lower than the historical average (7%.)

On that basis, you'd have a pension pot of £139,000 by the time you were 60. That could give you a pension income of around £8000 a year on top of your state payments. Not big, but not bad considering you had only saved £2000 a year. And, don't forget, your annuity would carry on paying out even if you lived to 100!

Here's one more example. Let's imagine you don't start saving for a pension until you're 50. If you save £4000 a year and retire at 65, you could build a pot of £82,000. As you're retiring at a later age, then you could get an annuity of around £5,500 a year. Again, not great, but better than nothing.

So yes, it's best to start saving for a pension when you're young. But if you wait till middle age, don't despair. It's not too late to make a difference.

One more day

This series is coming to an end. There's one more day to go. In the final article, I'll look at changes that are planned for 2012, and also at alternatives to conventional pensions. See you then!

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (13)

  • yoshibonnie2
    Love rating 0
    yoshibonnie2 said

    In answer to macspoffle. Yes very relevant. It was published over 2 years ago. But nobody has taken any notice of its warnings. To quote a short piece:- "Companies have been permitted to take 'pension holidays' and also swipe pension scheme surpluses to increase corporate profits. Now too many are closing good pension schemes or diluting employee rights. Some people have sought to supplement their state pension by investing in personal pension plans, but the finance industry sold dud products and millions of people have lost their savings. Without addressing the above issues there can be no durable solution to the pensions crisis.

    This is only a short paragraph of 63 pages of good common sense. It is a pity that Government seem to have ignored these warnings. Since then things have even got worse.

    Read it before you comment. I am not a pension expert and even I can see lots of sense in this publication.

    Report on 09 July 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LastChip
    Love rating 64
    LastChip said

    "Well, they've been disastrous for people with the Equitable but

    the government should have been more generous with its compensation."

    Why?

    If you're going to compensate everyone, each time there's a hickup in either the markets or management, you may as well just revert to the government to provide a decent pension for everyone. Further, if it becomes the norm, for government to step in everytime investments underperform (for whatever reason), what incentive is there for fund managers to even try and produce some sensible results.

    Your own strategy relies upon history suggesting the stock market will out perform other types of investment. That's a leap of faith that may, or may not work. If you're going to commit and possibly struggle to save in a pension, you need something a bit more reliable than blind faith.

    About 25 years ago, I was told an endowment policy that will mature in a few years time, would not only pay my mortgage, I would be able to buy a new car, go on a world cruse and live in luxury for the rest of my life. The truth is, I've been getting letters for the past few years warning me it will fail to even pay my mortgage debt! Damn good job I didn't rely on that and my mortgage has long since been paid.

    Go on believing mate, and I sincerely wish you the best possible fortune, but I believe it's a damn great con and I'm surprised how many people are being taken in by it.

    Report on 12 July 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name Credit rate (AER)
Based on £1
Overdraft
rate

Based on £1
Apply
now

Santander 123 Current Account

0.0% 0% plus £1.00 per day usage fee Apply

first direct 1st Account

N/A 15.9% EAR Apply

Halifax Reward Current Account

N/A 0% plus £2.00 per day usage fee Apply
W3C  Thank you for using The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse