Time to act on the pensions timebomb

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 08 June 2009  |  Comments 20 comments

The government should withdraw final salary pensions from younger public sector workers.

Pensions are back in the news. Three companies announced changes to their final salary pension schemes last week, and they won't be the last.

But there's one final salary scheme in existence that's way bigger than anything else out there. That's the public sector's scheme. In 2007, 5.2 million public sector workers were active members of a final salary scheme compared to 2.7 million in the private sector.

What's more, the Treasury says that the total public sector liability is £650 billion.

I don't think that is sustainable in the long-term and it's about time that the government introduced some meaningful changes.

The first step should be to close all public sector final salary schemes to new entrants. The second step should be to modify the scheme. Some current employees should lose their right to a final salary pension. In other words, the government should follow Barclays' lead.

I'd withdraw the right to a final salary pension for any public sector worker under the age of 45. These younger workers will have the time to boost their pension provision by other routes if they wish to do so whereas a 55 year-old will struggle and would rightly complain about unfair treatment.

So that's my solution. What do you think? Let me know in the comments feature at the bottom of this post.

Postcript: Following on from LastChip's comment at the bottom of this blog. I thought I'd expand a little on my proposal. Yes, if the employee has made contributions to a final salary pension, then he shouldn't lose those contributions. The money should be paid into a defined contribution fund or even the hybrid 'cash balance' scheme that Barclays is using.

The government should also start contributing to a defined contribution fund from now on, and should also make a contribution to the fund which should partly (but not wholly) make up for the loss of the final salary pension.

Of course, I understand that this would be a very controversial measure. Many public sector workers would understandably be very angry. But we face a looming pensions crisis. The private sector is now beginning to welch on its final salary commitments. In the end, the public sector will have to do the same thing. We might as well get on with it.

Some City economists think the economy is on the verge of growing again. Check out my blog post: Is the recession over?

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (20)

  • AlexInCornwall
    Love rating 1
    AlexInCornwall said

    Don't know about other schemes like the teachers and NHS, but the main civil service scheme has been slowly changing for some years now. In 2002 the employees' contribution rate rose from 1.5% to 3.5% for new entrants. In 2007 the pension age was raised from 60 to 65 for new entrants, and the scheme switched from final salary to career average, putting more weight on lower earnings earlier on in your career.

    Additionally there is now an optional money purchase scheme as an alternative to the conventional one. Presumably in time it will be the default for new entrants.

    Report on 10 June 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • msmoneywise
    Love rating 21
    msmoneywise said

    I came to this discussion a tad late, because I only looked at the link following on from 'Learn all about pensions in 5 days'. The civil service pension scheme is not a generous one for the vast majority of civil servants who are paid well below the national average.

    I recently took early retirement from HM Revenue & Customs because they are cutting jobs left, right and centre, and I thought it better to leave rather than be forced to change departments or travel up to 3 hours a day to get to work in one of their so-called 'strategic sites'. After 20 years in the department, my total monthly pension would have been £256.37, but I chose to take a slightly larger lumpsum (£16108.00 rather than £8967.46) and invest it myself. So now my 'enviable' final salary civil service pension is £204.24 a month.

    If the Government had efficient public services, especially in HMRC, DWP, UK Borders Agency and the police forces, if they stopped swingeing job cuts and let the trained and capable staff do their jobs, perhaps we could reduce the £42 billion tax gap??? There is money there for the collecting, but this Government has done everything in it's power to break the backbone of what was once the best civil service in the world. Well, you get what you pay for. I for one am going to emigrate to a country where I can afford to live on my pension, if such a place exists! An upcoming 3rd world country, perhaps?

     

    Report on 02 July 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name Credit rate (AER)
Based on £1
Overdraft
rate

Based on £1
Apply
now

Santander 123 Current Account

0.0% 0% plus £1.00 per day usage fee Apply

first direct 1st Account

N/A 15.9% EAR Apply

Halifax Reward Current Account

N/A 0% plus £2.00 per day usage fee Apply
W3C  Thank you for using Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels