House prices up but this is a blip

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 04 June 2009  |  Comments 7 comments

Halifax says house prices rose in May but I reckon it's a blip.

We saw some more green shoots in the housing market today. But I still don't think we've hit the bottom.

Today's news comes from Halifax. The mortgage bank reports a 2.6% rise in average UK house prices in May.

Halifax also points out that a lower proportion of our pay is going towards mortgage payments. Typical mortgage payments for a new borrower have declined from a peak of 48% of average disposable earnings in Autumn 2007 to 31% in the first quarter of this year. All other things being equal, that should be positive for house prices.

However, I still reckon the medium-term trend is down.

That's because our economy is still in a pretty rotten state. Sure, confidence has returned to an extent, banks aren't going  bust, and share prices have risen 25% from their lows. But I think people are forgetting that governments and individuals are carrying massive levels of debt. As soon as we see any signs of economic growth, governments will raise taxes and/or cut spending. And that means economic growth will be sluggish at best.

If economic growth is sluggish, rising house prices are unlikely.

What's more, the house price to earnings ratio is still above its long-term average. According to Halifax, it's now at 4.36, above the average of 4.0. I still expect this ratio to fall below its average at some point in this cycle.

Then there's the history argument. The last housing crash started in 1989; house prices fell a fair bit that year. Then they pretty much moved sideways in 1990 and 1991, followed by further big falls in 1992. Markets normally don't normally move in a straight line. And I don't see why this cycle should be any different.

************************************************************************

Postscript: The Royal Institution of Charterned Surveyours (RICS) has put out an interesting comment on the Halifax figures, so I thought I'd publish the whole statement:

'This is only the third monthly increase in prices over the last twenty-one months. The previous two gains were quickly reversed but this move appears to have more legs. Significantly, it is reflecting a similar trend in the Nationwide index (released last week.) It is also consistent with the gentle upward move in the RICS sales to stock ratio which historically has been a good lead indicator of house price inflation.'

'It is too early to say that house prices have bottomed out. Unemployment is set to rise further in the coming months and could yet climb to the 3 million mark. In addition, support for the market could be undermined by a lack of available finance for first-time buyers. Crucially, however, a lack of new instruction to estate agents is resulting in a shortage of good quality stock in the right locations. This could continue to provide support for prices in the near term.'

I'm a bit more negative than RICS. But who knows for sure?

More: Recovery may peter out

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (7)

  • Dimwit
    Love rating 1
    Dimwit said

    The key difference now is the end of the factor that fuels all bubbles - Speculation. And the craziest speculation will always be at the point where everyone is saying 'prices can only go up'. Well, the last 18 months have shown that's not true, so take out speculation, and you're back to fundamentals - which is the historical ratio between house prices and income, which means prices have quite a way to fall yet. But there will be resistance from everyone who thought they were living in their pension, so it'll take a long time - maybe 5 years, maybe longer. Do the sums - saving towards your next house while renting is cheaper than paying the mortgage + yearly losses from house price falls on owned property!

    Report on 05 June 2009  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Johnny5
    Love rating 11
    Johnny5 said

    Let's get one thing straight finally. The oft quoted multiples of income(usually 3) to determine the average cost of a home is as useful as a chocolate teapot !

    Anybody who believe's it is in a time of multiple earners in a household just for starters not even taking into account equity, deposits etc etc, is as clued up on property economics as my cat !

    And while I'm at it let's look at this statement by Dimwit

    "Do the sums - saving towards your next house while renting is cheaper than paying the mortgage + yearly losses from house price falls on owned property! "

    Well in Dimwit's universe, like most Doomster's he knows doesn't he, he has taken his view as an absolute definite. Hardly objective. Dimwit doesn't know more than anyone else. But to start from that entrenched premise is dangerous when making financial decisions. Obviously Dimwit's landlord thinks property is a good investment and a good idea while Dimwit doesn't. But Dimwit does like to live in a property versus a tent or caravan which is why he rents one. If Dimwit's landlord decided Dimwit was right and sells up that'll be Dimwit out on his ear then.

    Report on 10 June 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name Credit rate (AER)
Based on £1
Overdraft
rate

Based on £1
Apply
now

Santander 123 Current Account

0.0% 0% plus £1.00 per day usage fee Apply

first direct 1st Account

N/A 15.9% EAR Apply

Halifax Reward Current Account

N/A 0% plus £2.00 per day usage fee Apply
W3C  Thank you for using Three Kings